Pages: [1] |
1. + tackling and EVE mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mikaila Penshar wrote: In the movie version of this thread I picture OP played by Gabriel Byrne- n'uff said? facepalm.....
- by Romani4 - at 2013.03.05 19:45:00
|
2. + tackling and EVE mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Akara Ito wrote: Standing based weapon locks are incredibly dumb. Just imagine a spy in your fleet bubbling you and 250(0) of your best friends and you cant even shoot him. Ok! Let`s simply disable ability to put some points on your + not in ...
- by Romani4 - at 2013.03.05 19:19:00
|
3. + tackling and EVE mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Now we have a situation when the standings needs only for some "relation" (sure - to don`t have any relations with them ) with POS guns. And the rest ... I think - here CCP needs to make something.
- by Romani4 - at 2013.03.05 19:13:00
|
4. + tackling and EVE mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
De'Veldrin wrote: Frankly - given the new dueling mechanic, I fully expect CCP to continue their march towards rampant themepark-ism by turning off the ability to awox freely, at least in highsec, and instantiate the CONCORD wtfbbq for it. Wa...
- by Romani4 - at 2013.03.05 19:06:00
|
5. + tackling and EVE mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: I wont shoot the messenger, since I think you're translating for someone.... But do us a favor and smack that tard. AWOXing is a part of EvE.... It adds a ton of valuable danger and ambiance when your friend can turn ...
- by Romani4 - at 2013.03.05 18:52:00
|
6. + tackling and EVE mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
DataRunner Attor wrote: I honestly don't understand the grammar. Sorry for my bad grammar((( I have proposed a mechanism which prohibits hostile actions to so-corps and ally members to eleminate +tackling. Thats better?
- by Romani4 - at 2013.03.05 18:44:00
|
7. + tackling and EVE mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Omnathious Deninard wrote: If it is not your idea it is best not to post it under your name, it will save you a head ache and having to read lots of trolls. On the topic of (not) your idea, no. There are times where shooting a blue is a necessa...
- by Romani4 - at 2013.03.05 18:38:00
|
8. + tackling and EVE mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hi everyone! Why CCP don`t do something with +tackling mechanism? Do`nt have idea? I`ll make one as gift! When we enter in any nullsec corp - we have Evil Security Officer with some questions for us, don`t we? Why they so suspecting us? We "whit...
- by Romani4 - at 2013.03.05 18:31:00
|
9. Low Sec Mining Barge - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Maybe there can be capital ship type w/o ability to go in hi-sec... Only for low-sec & 0.0... I don`t make economic to collapse... But have some new ships, for some changes... It will be great! So... I`m put with this proposal. Dixi. ;)
- by Romani4 - at 2011.09.05 18:49:00
|
10. Low Sec Mining Barge - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Newt Rondanse CCP has outright said that they will release no ship that can out-mine a Hulk, so unless they change their mind on that going bigger is a non-starter. Will dream about that day... We have 5 hulk with Rorual....
- by Romani4 - at 2011.08.19 13:43:00
|
11. Low Sec Mining Barge - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hi all.. Mayby this talking go in wrong direction? I start this topic about new ship... Only need that ;) I have tried many fits.. but... ORE ship - this is ORE ships.
- by Romani4 - at 2011.08.19 09:29:00
|
12. Low Sec Mining Barge - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
That`s right... Only "Atni-Bot" will make new ship to real...
- by Romani4 - at 2011.08.17 07:51:00
|
13. Low Sec Mining Barge - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Any one have any ideas, except "botting"?
- by Romani4 - at 2011.08.16 07:42:00
|
14. Low Sec Mining Barge - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Romani4 on 15/08/2011 08:38:02 True... for (1) there can be "capcha" or "planetary style" tool. With "capcha" - all clear. With "planetary styl" - open new "asteroid screen" with manual targeting system for each laser. Resource sca...
- by Romani4 - at 2011.08.15 08:34:00
|
15. Tech 3 Industrial Cruiser - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Good idea! +1
- by Romani4 - at 2011.08.15 08:02:00
|
16. Low Sec Mining Barge - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Believe me - we just make mining like U advice. But I talk about brand new tesh... Need some new thing to make miners life more happier.
- by Romani4 - at 2011.08.15 07:53:00
|
17. Hulk Crystal Bay - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
+1! Good idea!
- by Romani4 - at 2011.08.15 06:02:00
|
18. Low Sec Mining Barge - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
We don`t talk about botting... We need low sec capital like ship... Or something like that.
- by Romani4 - at 2011.08.14 19:47:00
|
19. Low Sec Mining Barge - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Danika Princip I too want to make botting even easier. botting... we make it manual))))) truly meditation!!!
- by Romani4 - at 2011.08.14 18:30:00
|
20. Low Sec Mining Barge - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Romani4 on 14/08/2011 15:40:23 Hi there! Maybe we, miners, can have a low sec (lice carriers, rorqual and other capital ships) minig barge? It may be Capital Ship and have new "capital mining lasers". Like Rorqual - but only for mi...
- by Romani4 - at 2011.08.14 15:35:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |