EVE Search - Posts by Salvos Rhoska

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 381-400 of 4752 for by author Salvos Rhoska (0,66 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200
381. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] baltec1 claims cost and SP have nothing to do with balance. Yet he wants T3C cost to build reduced, and SP loss removed. Hmmm! - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.23 07:51:09
382. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] The cloak/nulli issue is hilarious when compared to the discussions on removing cynos from LS. There many of them same posters felt it was fair and sensible that JFs can lol-cyno past LS. Apparently that they arent interceptable at gates there wa... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.23 07:33:59
383. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Merin Ryskin wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: I spent 3 months out in null sec in a cloaky Ishtar. I didn't die once and I made around 20 billion isk running combat sites. It was in the old northern Goodswarm space mostly. Using wormholes and gi... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.23 07:07:05
384. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Gimme Sake wrote: This thread has turned into "ccplease dun nurf my pve pwnmobile" and Baltec's Megathron vs everyone solo forum peeveepee. Meanwhile, on Reddit.... Yup, looks like a Reddit post to me. - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.22 10:29:12
385. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Shae Tadaruwa wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: baltec1 wrote: remove ability to fit nullification and cov ops at the same time, remove SP loss on death. How convenient for PvP players, at the expense of PvE players. Are the occassional T3C... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.22 10:22:41
386. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] baltec1 wrote: remove ability to fit nullification and cov ops at the same time, remove SP loss on death. How convenient for PvP players, at the expense of PvE players. Are the occassional T3C interlopers running content in your space reall... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.22 10:09:49
387. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Jeremiah Saken wrote: baltec1 wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Explain, specifically, how to achieve that without causing extinction of hostile deepspace nomads. Use one of the other cloaky ships. You don't need an overpowered mini battleshi... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.22 09:41:08
388. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Jeremiah Saken wrote: Dracvlad wrote: It is pointless having any discussion with baltec1, because he spent time in a Purifier he understands the nomad existence., I think that says it all in terms of any input from him... Roll I don't thin... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 22:05:36
389. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] baltec1 wrote: No the best way forwards is to make them the generalists they were always supposed to be. Explain, specifically, how to achieve that without causing extinction of hostile deepspace nomads. I proposed diversification of the 4 ... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 21:53:43
390. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Frostys Virpio wrote: HAC are suffering from the T3 plague just like AF do. Their role is better done by another ship so they see really low usage. The way to correct the HACs problem is not to buff them. You have to move away what flat out sto... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 21:38:11
391. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] baltec1 wrote: In the last two pages we got..: ...Many people trying to run this thread into the ground. Speak ontopic, or gtfo. I know T3Cs have been an issue for you for years. But at least read and respond, and make your case, in a thre... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 18:15:00
392. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Frostys Virpio wrote: Rroff wrote: HACs are more of the attack versus combat variety - something CCP seems to apply somewhat patchily but there it is - this is a fairly succinct summary of it: There are 2 HACs per faction. There is not... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 15:22:18
393. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Lets be real. Most HACs are crap. Even faction cruisers outstrip them, except for a few instances where max HAC skills may slightly improve. Gila/Cynabal/Orthrus are seriously dangerous and capable ships. HAC status is not a result of T3Cs. It... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 14:39:23
394. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Im all for a T3C rebalance, but not in the way many here might think. The cloaking/nullifying is crucial to remain. The dps is crucial to remain. IDGAF about swapping rigs. Its a bad idea. EHP can be looked at. Tengu vs Sleipnir EHP and resists ... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 13:57:33
395. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Rroff wrote: Gimme Sake wrote: The reason for the rebalance is pvp not pve. You can do a 5/10 in Cerberus if that's your major worry. One way or another it will still affect PVE though - ignoring the PVE element when making any changes ... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 13:16:45
396. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Gimme Sake wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Gimme Sake wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Rroff wrote: I was thinking that in respect to the strategic aspect i.e. IIRC Gallente tangle with Caldari quite a bit who amongst other things use ECM so... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 12:53:16
397. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Gimme Sake wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Rroff wrote: I was thinking that in respect to the strategic aspect i.e. IIRC Gallente tangle with Caldari quite a bit who amongst other things use ECM so for strategic purposes ewar resilience on th... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 12:29:18
398. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Beast of Revelations wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: That T3Cs are prevalent or present in mass combat, is a result of the inordinate wealth/SP of players choosing to field them who can shrug off the loss, not of the class itself. The proble... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 12:22:44
399. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Rroff wrote: I was thinking that in respect to the strategic aspect i.e. IIRC Gallente tangle with Caldari quite a bit who amongst other things use ECM so for strategic purposes ewar resilience on the Prot could be a useful feature - which is w... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 10:33:10
400. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] I agree with Rorrf. HACs and T3Cs are not comparable. Their functions are different. HACs are heavy cruisers, T3Cs are strategic cruisers. If anything, many HACs are underperforming, possibly in large part because of the rather limited versatil... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 10:22:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.