EVE Search - Posts by Salvos Rhoska

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 381-400 of 4738 for by author Salvos Rhoska (0,59 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200
381. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Rroff wrote: Gimme Sake wrote: The reason for the rebalance is pvp not pve. You can do a 5/10 in Cerberus if that's your major worry. One way or another it will still affect PVE though - ignoring the PVE element when making any changes ... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 13:16:45
382. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Gimme Sake wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Gimme Sake wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Rroff wrote: I was thinking that in respect to the strategic aspect i.e. IIRC Gallente tangle with Caldari quite a bit who amongst other things use ECM so... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 12:53:16
383. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Gimme Sake wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Rroff wrote: I was thinking that in respect to the strategic aspect i.e. IIRC Gallente tangle with Caldari quite a bit who amongst other things use ECM so for strategic purposes ewar resilience on th... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 12:29:18
384. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Beast of Revelations wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: That T3Cs are prevalent or present in mass combat, is a result of the inordinate wealth/SP of players choosing to field them who can shrug off the loss, not of the class itself. The proble... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 12:22:44
385. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Rroff wrote: I was thinking that in respect to the strategic aspect i.e. IIRC Gallente tangle with Caldari quite a bit who amongst other things use ECM so for strategic purposes ewar resilience on the Prot could be a useful feature - which is w... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 10:33:10
386. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] I agree with Rorrf. HACs and T3Cs are not comparable. Their functions are different. HACs are heavy cruisers, T3Cs are strategic cruisers. If anything, many HACs are underperforming, possibly in large part because of the rather limited versatil... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 10:22:00
387. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] One way to go about it, might be to specialise the 4 different T3Cs further, differently, at the expense of other specialisations. Lokis for example currently make very poor solo PvE ships, but have web bonuses for gangs and group PvE. Something... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 09:45:45
388. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] baltec1 wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Thats like saying people use Machs for blitzing cos they are OP. Or people use Epithal cos its OP for PI shipping. No. People use them because they are ships which are optimal for that job. In this ca... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.21 06:00:18
389. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] baltec1 wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: They arent the "best". A Gila is better as a cheaper craft with less SP requirements. A Stratios is better as a dedicated covops scanning ship with a larger cargo hold and drone redundancy. HACs are well... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.20 12:37:51
390. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Gimme Sake wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Whatever changes are made need to consider solo/duo combat explorers and nomads (whether PvP or PvE driven) as well. In the current ship trees, T3Cs are the optimal choice for that.. I agree that, ... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.20 07:44:42
391. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Gimme Sake wrote: Why should SoE have an equivalent pve exploration ship when they're pretty much specialised for that purpose? Why do you ask me? I never claimed there should be. I pointed out that there isn't, and that T3Cs fill that rol... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.19 11:04:19
392. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Whatever changes are made need to consider solo/duo combat explorers as well. - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.19 07:12:37
393. Alphas and F2P Have Failed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Just let it roll, or stop posting in it to bump it. - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.11 09:38:57
394. Exploration etiquette - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] No etiquette. Completely depends on your own preference. As poster above, it can be considered in your own interest to clear a site, so it might respawn nearby. However leaving it incomplete, can create content, if you are creative. Speaking/con... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.10 13:17:57
395. A place to call home - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Nicola Romanoff wrote: When im online it would be good to be able to just chat to people that are not just in local, so I think from a more socialising point of view. Didnt really think about there being specific types of chat channel, makes se... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.10 13:09:00
396. A place to call home - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] What are you looking for in a channel? Banter, socialising, or something more specific? - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.10 12:55:12
397. Thinking of Playing Again. How's PvP (non-alliance) these days? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Zeknichov wrote: One where I'm stealing someone's loot, cargo, or something that made it worthwhile other then potentially the satisfaction of destroying someone's insured ship? Yes. - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.10 12:22:58
398. Command Skills - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Keep them in your head. They are a long train and not one all that many people have. Its a niche but one that is always in high demand. They also unlock some pretty awesome and fun ships for solo play. Think of them as a long term investment th... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.10 11:44:12
399. The Social Experiment that is Eve Online - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Mr Epeen wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: (Albeit, CCP could implement SP loss for clone death, similar to the TC3 precedent.) There used to be the possibility of that back when we had to keep our clones up to date by purchasing clone grades. I... - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.08 15:31:44
400. Is 'war supplier' an actual role in Eve? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] HS/Jita/Forge is the NS proxy market and production ground. Once you figure out how that works, you can profit from it until it runs EVE into the ground. - by Salvos Rhoska - at 2017.04.08 14:40:24
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.