Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 |
381. Banning of Limited Ships (In reference to Logistics) - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Brinxter Originally by: Suitonia Using a T3 isn't effective either as non-scrubs will just right click - look at, check you have the logistics subsystem, and then ban you if you do. Nope, you dont understand. Yo...
- by Seldarine - at 2011.04.11 14:09:00
|
382. HYDRA RELOADED supports the Banning Rule - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: fattrader II Originally by: Suitonia The Banning rule is ******ed in my opinion. Lucky it is Shirou that talks for Hydra and not a ***got like you, go cry somewhere else Originally by: Mr Rive at least w...
- by Seldarine - at 2011.04.11 14:04:00
|
383. Different viewpoint on the banning rule (yes, another thread ;) - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
your topic title should instead read: "Same exact opinion expressed already by many different people (yes, another thread ;)" ______________________________ Seldarine
- by Seldarine - at 2011.04.11 14:02:00
|
384. Banning rule does not deliver - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
they should bann the new forums.. oh wait ______________________________ Seldarine
- by Seldarine - at 2011.04.10 11:08:00
|
385. Militia representation in Alliance Tournament?? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
The Hardman wrote: It is an alliance tournament. And militia teams in the past have been more of a headache for organisers and an embarrassment for viewers than anything else.
- by Seldarine - at 2011.04.09 19:33:00
|
386. Sticky:AT9: Ship points value discussion - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
I also would like to see a seperation of empire faction crusiers and pirate. I dont believe something such as a navy caracal should be 1 point more than a cerberus.
- by Seldarine - at 2011.04.09 19:25:00
|
387. Request for a Rule Clarifications: Captains - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
I can answer from what happend last tournament, no idea if things will be changed this time: 1) Captain does not have to on the field or in fleet for all matches. A representative from the team though has to be in the tournament captains channel....
- by Seldarine - at 2011.04.09 19:12:00
|
388. Remote reppers on t1 cruiser hulls. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
In light of the banning rule, will it be possible to use the tech1 cruisers with a repping bonus such as osprey and remote repair modules as an alternative to a more likely to be banned but much mmore capable tech2 logistics cruiser ?
- by Seldarine - at 2011.04.08 17:12:00
|
389. Sticky:AT9: Banning discussion - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Removing something like 3/4 of the hitpoints from a ship of choice could be interesting.
- by Seldarine - at 2011.04.08 16:38:00
|
390. Sticky:AT9: Banning discussion - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
I am not sure what to mkae of this rule. I can understand how it would be hilarious to see a setup thats relient on a logistics to suddenly have their logistics removed, or teams not relient on logistics fielding a bait logistics in the hope it...
- by Seldarine - at 2011.04.08 16:23:00
|
391. Tournament Rules - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Even if ships did have faction mods fitted, being unable to see a ships fittings during a match would remove any enjoyment of seeing shiny mods blow up because you would not know they are there. You need to remember that the tournament is already...
- by Seldarine - at 2011.04.08 16:19:00
|
392. Sticky:AT9: Flagship discussion - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
With the added flexibility and increased use of flagships there is going be, especialy since they are immune to "banning", would it not add more variety to teams setups to extend the flagship class availability to include commandships and T3 ?
- by Seldarine - at 2011.04.08 16:00:00
|
393. EVE Online: Incursion 1.4 deployment update - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Rando Varlesson You know it be nice of CCP to give the Eve community something for this long wait time. They are giving us something, Incursion 1.4 ______________________________ Seldarine
- by Seldarine - at 2011.04.06 15:49:00
|
394. A modest proposal - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
bring it :) ______________________________ Seldarine
- by Seldarine - at 2011.03.21 23:10:00
|
395. wtb 60d gtc 630mill - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
accepted ami
- by Seldarine - at 2011.03.03 23:23:00
|
396. wtb 60d gtc 630mill - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
for me
- by Seldarine - at 2011.03.03 23:20:00
|
397. VOTF Hangers Stripped - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
lololololo sorry for hurting ur internet feelings person i don't even know ______________________________ Seldarine
- by Seldarine - at 2010.11.27 00:57:00
|
398. AT9: when? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
my guess would be february to april but who knows voltron will be forming ! ______________________________ Seldarine
- by Seldarine - at 2010.11.05 00:47:00
|
399. Alliance Tournament prizes being given out months late - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I would like to know the official CCP position on this. Is there an actual reason for it ? It is nearly a month since the tournament finished, yet no prizes have been handed out. I have received 2 mails from CCP Claw, around a week apart, each ...
- by Seldarine - at 2010.07.12 15:01:00
|
400. Fire Calmdown - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Seldarine on 12/07/2010 14:28:34 Originally by: Lee Dalton I think filing a petition or making a CSM thread will be useful to bring this to CCPs attention. I would like to think that the higher-ups in CCP would not be ha...
- by Seldarine - at 2010.07.12 14:28:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |