Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
121. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mars Theran wrote: Not that I agree with the guy, but I'd hesitate to say that they weren't petty and myopic. Actually, they are extremely myopic; it's just that they also happen to be right in that Nullsec needs a self-sustaining player econom...
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.25 10:09:00
|
122. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Fractal Muse wrote: My concerns in the document remain the same in that this is meant to have been strategic level input on the direction of EVE Online. Within that framework, the document splits out each individual element and suggests improve...
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.25 10:06:00
|
123. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
svenska flicka wrote: Seleene wrote: svenska flicka wrote: It is like the republican party and seleene is mitt Romney. Near ten years I've been playing this game and this is probably the worst thing I've ever been called. Damn, son, th...
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.24 19:34:00
|
124. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Watching Snow Axe and Frying Doom go back and forth is fun.
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.24 17:12:00
|
125. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: Josef Djugashvilis wrote: I voted for Seleene on the basis that I believed he would represent ALL of Eve. I hope I am not mistaken. That's one hell of an expectation. Not really. Feel free to ask TEST's elec...
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.24 17:10:00
|
126. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Fractal Muse wrote: I am very disappointed in the CSM for not even bringing up the concept of EVE Online being interconnected and an ecosystem. I don't like that they didn't suggest much, of anything, that would bring more players together in...
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.24 17:07:00
|
127. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: Snow Axe wrote: So you're saying that fixing a segment of the game that is literally broken is a waste of company resources? No not at all, I am saying that an area with 20% of the games population is not worth 100% of t...
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.24 17:01:00
|
128. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
svenska flicka wrote: It is like the republican party and seleene is mitt Romney. Near ten years I've been playing this game and this is probably the worst thing I've ever been called. Damn, son, that's harsh.
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.24 16:55:00
|
129. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well, I tend to just talk about whatever is a problem in the game, regardless of what sector of ~space~ it's in. Also, this picture is relavent.
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.22 17:44:00
|
130. The Big Lie - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: Also, how do articles about Planetside, Mechwarrior or WoT advance the CFC? Or am I being naive here? I've always seen that as the site covering its bases so it still has stuff to write about in case / when / if CCP implodes.
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.22 17:41:00
|
131. The Big Lie - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malcanis, this was an excellent read. Kudos for putting into words what many of us feel.
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.22 17:37:00
|
132. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jame Jarl Retief wrote: If you are going to talk about player retention, you NEED to talk about hi-sec. Oh believe me, we do. That's just not what the focus of this document was. Quite a lot of us have many interests in hi-sec and there are ...
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.22 17:34:00
|
133. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
fukier wrote: i like it but it makes no mention of the WIS prototype... You're not wrong. We don't have enough information on where that is going or if it will ever actually be a thing to even take it into account as a realistic factor for r...
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.22 17:13:00
|
134. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
(This is a re-post from the Jita Park thread in order to get this subject a bit more visibility.) Earlier this month, EVEGÇÖs Senior Producer CCP Ripley called a meeting with the CSM to solicit feedback on some challenges and goals CCP was addr...
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.22 16:49:00
|
135. Sticky:CSM Chairman Hotline - AMA (Ask Me Anything) non-NDA about EVE, the CSM & CCP - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
rodyas wrote: Who will be the winner of the new Eden open tournament? Is it okay to say that I don't really care? Quite honestly, I have nothing but respect for the CCP folks that work a lot of extra hours to put this stuff on for us, but...
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.22 16:38:00
|
136. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Scatim Helicon wrote: Perhaps the CSM or a CCPer could drop in here and update us on whether there has been a favourable response within the company to this? Believe me, we are very much looking forward to talking about everything that led...
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.22 16:35:00
|
137. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Poetic Stanziel wrote: Now this document speaks to correcting development course as well. But it's certainly not time sensitive. CCP won't be roadmapping their next expansion, deciding upon features, until January or February. Do you... actu...
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.19 15:40:00
|
138. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
None ofthe Above wrote: On a strategic level I have to admit, the document makes some good points, but seems to me to be stating the blindingly obvious. Perhaps it was something that needed to be said though. You pretty much nailed it. In t...
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.19 05:43:00
|
139. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Just want to add this bit - this document is in no way a stand alone proposal. It represents just one piece of a much larger engagement with CCP over several weeks. There have been multiple voice meeting sessions and other exchanges of ideas along...
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.18 23:41:00
|
140. EVE Online Development Strategy (CSM Public) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Snow Axe wrote: Well, since it's too late to attempt to give any feedback on this document or even discuss it in any meaningful way, I have to ask: what's the point of this thread? This is the type of thread that should have been posted before ...
- by Seleene - at 2012.11.18 22:41:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |