Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
21. T2 BPO Removal [Support] - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Desimus Maximus wrote: Shadowsword wrote: The Breadmaster wrote: Remove invention... because lets face it, f*** that clickfest. Add T1/T2 toggle to every BPO in game. Easy theorycrafting from here by CCP. Great idea, let's remove wh...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.08 08:28:00
|
22. fanfest faction warfare = datacores - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Removing the passive income of datacores if fine and dandy, but... what will be the purpose of R&D agents after it? If their current utility isn't replaced by another form of utility (active?), I'm against the change.
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.07 19:56:00
|
23. T2 BPO Removal [Support] - in Science and Industry [original thread]
The Breadmaster wrote: Remove invention... because lets face it, f*** that clickfest. Add T1/T2 toggle to every BPO in game. Easy theorycrafting from here by CCP. Great idea, let's remove whole layers of industry and make it super-easy li...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.07 19:46:00
|
24. nonstop non-consensual pvp is not a feature - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
How can a one-man corp lock down your whole corp when just one guy using EW is enough to render him harmless?
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.06 21:37:00
|
25. T2 BPO Removal [Support] - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Eva Volkova wrote: The first owner didnt pay that amount of money if was given by a lottery. And winning the lottery was, in the vast majority of cases, the result of a lot of sweat and time involved. And time = money. I know a guy who h...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.06 21:31:00
|
26. the importance of T2 BPOs - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Kenshin Tzestu wrote: More like BPO owners can undercut people trying invention to the point that they exit the market. Only on low-demand items, and since margins on low-demand are going to be poor anyway, why do you even bother? On low-d...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.06 14:25:00
|
27. T2 BPO Removal [Support] - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Kirith Vespira wrote: Seriously, dude, you don't have a friggin' clue what you're talking about. You should really stop posting now. Your comment lacks substance enlighten me on the clue that I should be talking ab...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.06 13:10:00
|
28. Scarlet Letters and Botters - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm in favor of doing it, for several reasons: - Cheating should have lasting consequences, and stoppping after being caught once or twice doesn't have any really signifiant one. - If someone bought isks, and by doing so implicitely supported bo...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.04 09:22:00
|
29. I Want Your Big Things - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
- I want to get rid of gates. Artificial chokepoints that promote static pvp and act as a risk-detterent if one side is significantly bigger than the other. - Also, cripple supercap's abilities unless they are in command of full squads. THAT woul...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.03 18:46:00
|
30. New Goon Scam to destroy PLEX market - Part of Burn Jita April 28th - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
scooter Kondur wrote: Dude no.... buy 10 plex put 10 plex in general freight container...will not fit in orca corp hold make courier kill freighter 10 plex gone from game goons charge 7-8 bill colalteral they win They'll do that two o...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.03.31 06:14:00
|
31. CCP - Be prepared for ALOT of Unsubs - JITA GANKS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's fine, they contribute to stimulate the mineral market. As long as they don't recycle alts to go around the sec statut penalty... Worse-case scenario, they manage to make Amarr or another major trade hub grow bigger than Jita.
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.03.30 13:59:00
|
32. making isk Mission running v mining so imbalanced. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Roime wrote: Level 3s should be balanced so that it's impossible to generate enough isk for a PLEX in a month then. Suicide gankers can keep the mining bot issue from getting out of hand : If lv3 become unprofitable for a bot, then they be...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.03.30 13:48:00
|
33. making isk Mission running v mining so imbalanced. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Roime wrote: Exactly, it's terribly misbalanced - under no circumstances should hisec PVE yield that much steady isk. That is why the mission bots run rampant. The mission bots would just switch to lv3 missions. Or even more mining bots. ...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.03.30 08:03:00
|
34. making isk Mission running v mining so imbalanced. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Abim Starkiller wrote: Jake Warbird wrote: More isk for things that shoot back. Seems fair. Thier is no chance of loseing a ship none at all. Im fine with low sec missions making isk as thier is reel risk. And trust me you have more chanc...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.03.30 06:04:00
|
35. isk faucet nerf which would you prefer? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Invent some new useful consumables (implants? drugs? fueled enhanced armor/shield hardeners?), change incursion payouts from isks to materials needed to manufacture those cunsomables. Inflation problem solved.
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.03.26 10:45:00
|
36. Follow up! Thread about kid killed in Florida. - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Jno Aubrey wrote: This gets the "F for History" award of the week. The whole point of our Second Amendment is to ensure that the citizenry has the means to overthrow tyranny in its own government should the need arise. Our founders were deeply...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.03.26 06:11:00
|
37. Follow up! Thread about kid killed in Florida. - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Herr Wilkus wrote: Pro gun control militant: Joseph Stalin, death toll: 20 million or more. Pro gun control militant: Chairman Mao, death toll: a lot. Are you done stating the obvious? Any tyrant is against arming the oppressed population....
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.03.25 23:04:00
|
38. Follow up! Thread about kid killed in Florida. - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: 1. We have guns because we can and don't need acceptance or permission (these are not cigarettes or SUVs) 2. We are not giving up a damned thing because "somebody somewhere did something bad". 3. This is more about pro...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.03.25 20:15:00
|
39. Just had a guy try and kick down our door! - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Karl Planck wrote: To the OP, I am happy there wasn't a real confrontation, owning a shotgun is the best way to go, get a gun safe and keep it loaded. Yeah, keeping a gun loaded is a great way to have your kid kill himself... If you want...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.03.19 22:50:00
|
40. Just had a guy try and kick down our door! - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Merin Ryskin wrote: Jhagiti Tyran wrote: I would rather take on one that didn't have a gun personally, you only need to look at the US to see how well the whole self defence thing works. Actually it works pretty well, unless you live in t...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.03.19 15:49:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |