Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
41. Has Hatred gone too far CCP? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor wrote: Gul'gotha Derv'ash wrote: Oh wait, isn't that what the Goons want so they can make their pets mine more and cause huge inflation in the mineral prices. Maybe that is why they are run...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.02 16:21:00
|
42. Has Hatred gone too far CCP? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kimmi Chan wrote: I think that it's important to remember that the vast majority of miners that have been ganked are likely not here complaining about being ganked. They are likely playing the game and learning from their loss. Any ship, exh...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.02 08:14:00
|
43. Has Hatred gone too far CCP? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kimmi Chan wrote: And these responses, at least in your opinion, are what? You're saying they equate to "Common Sense is a bannable offense"? Or they are spewing vitriol and hate. I'm confused. If you want to make a point be clear about it ...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.02 07:46:00
|
44. Has Hatred gone too far CCP? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kimmi Chan wrote: Spikeflach wrote: Natsett Amuinn wrote: Now, now. We can't actually expect them to do anything that would cut into the amount of ore they can hold by using slots to actually improve thier ability to not get blown up. T...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.02 07:24:00
|
45. Has Hatred gone too far CCP? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Natsett Amuinn wrote: Now, now. We can't actually expect them to do anything that would cut into the amount of ore they can hold by using slots to actually improve thier ability to not get blown up. That woudl be stupid. They have "ISK PER HO...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.02 07:07:00
|
46. It's time to PUT UP or SHUT UP. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Anyone notice how the group on one side of the issue now has everyone using the word "bleating". :) Can't say I really had any respect for the hulkageddon stuff, but the novelty of it has kind of gone out the window. I remember seeing threads of ...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.02 07:01:00
|
47. Greifers vs CCP, Hulkageddon is winning. Time for CCP to code changes. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Vicata Heth wrote: Funny, all I hear is bleating from carebears because they can't make endless amounts of ISK without any risk. Yeah, lots of carebears in eve, apparently they have to go to hi-sec to battle harden themselves into full blown...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.02 06:34:00
|
48. [Proposal] Ban CONCORD - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I believe Concord is there to enforce ethics and morals in hi-sec. Which means the players do not have to create and enforce their own ethics and morals. I could see the idea of removing Concord, it makes everyone fair game. Then people start re...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.02 06:16:00
|
49. [Proposal] Bodyguarding through EWAR - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I like the idea of some way to "take a bullet" for another ship.
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.02 06:08:00
|
50. Has Hatred gone too far CCP? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It is all about the tears, nothing is more valuable than ganker tears. :) But i would like to point out, there is actually lots of civilized discussions and even some "goons" have made decent and respectable responses to threads. But yes, alot o...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.02 05:52:00
|
51. CCP needs to take a hard look at Goonswarm and Hulkageddon to save EVE. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Musashi IV wrote: CCP just does not care about carebears!! People you perceive as carebears exist in 0.0 alliances too, in fact, even the most hardcore groups can be considered carebears. CCP cares about all its players. Companies would rat...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.02 05:48:00
|
52. CCP - Stop allowing one alliance to control the game! or there wont be anyone left - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: I am definitely no fan of Goonswarm. I may be in favor of altering null sec sovereignty to allow in the small alliances more easily and making things harder for larger alliances on terms of historical models. What I am NOT ...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.02 05:34:00
|
53. HiSec security is CCP's responsibility. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Welsige wrote: The real problem is that people chose to live in high sec where they are not in control of their environment. Some people claim null is safer. It can actualy be, since an alliance control its environment and know whats going on ...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.01 21:40:00
|
54. Is the penalty for suicide-ganking too low? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: A properly tanked Hulk has 30k EHP, all T2 Fit. A gang of 4 (20m Isk) Catalysts can kill that before CONCORD arrives. Put some RR on the field in the Hulks favor and that number jumps to about 15 Catalysts (75m) or 6 Tornado...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.01 21:07:00
|
55. Tanking the hulk: medium ancillary shield booster - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Snow Axe wrote: I seriously love seeing highsec pubbies talking about life in nullsec. Hint: the only of those things that actually happens on a regular basis is the first one. Hi sec dwellers* You want to make yourself look smart, knowle...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.01 20:50:00
|
56. Tanking the hulk: medium ancillary shield booster - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Snow Axe wrote: Even if that were true (it's not, entirely. Different fleet compositions can serve entirely different purposes), it'd be seen as an acceptable sacrifice, i.e. part of the game. Anyone who PVP's knows that if you sacrifice your...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.01 20:46:00
|
57. It's time to PUT UP or SHUT UP. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Snow Axe wrote: Man, you miners must be poor as **** if you think you could even get me to open my client for 5 million isk, let alone do something once it's open. I thought all the hubub was that hi sec was way to profitable and everyone th...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.01 20:32:00
|
58. Bucket of sorrow Thread: CCP, create a Minning Tears megathread! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Welsige wrote: Each miner that gets ganked out of their own stupidity flood the forums with tears, but in doing that they occupy valuable space that could be used for more worthwhile topics. like wether unicorn exist or wheter goons are destroy...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.01 19:23:00
|
59. The Golden Age of Piracy - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ginseng Jita wrote: When I pull up near your hulk. I will politely ask you to hand over 20 mil ISK or you'll lose your hulk. You'll laugh...say right. Then my two mates in desi's will warp in with one word from me. Lock you up and blow the b...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.01 19:04:00
|
60. Tanking the hulk: medium ancillary shield booster - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well, It's actually been a really long time since i mined, i think the trend going is mining is starting to cease in hi sec. This will raise low end mineral values because every 0.0 alliance in eve gets their low end minerals from hi sec. This w...
- by Spikeflach - at 2012.06.01 18:51:00
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |