| Pages: 1 [2] 3 |
21. [video] an open message to eve - in My EVE [original thread]
Mfume Apocal wrote: Requiescat wrote: so i thought i would demonstrate the kind of bs lots of "large pvp alliances" do with their "large pvp gangs" under normal circumstances: The Tuskers are large? We have a carrier?
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.14 00:09:00
|
22. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Zaine Maltis wrote: You're missing a mid? MSE? Yeh. Can also fit both a BCU and a meta DCU. Pretty sure I posted the fit a few pages back... Edit: Here; https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=623020#post623020
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.11 12:38:00
|
23. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Prometheus Exenthal wrote: It hasn't got the optimal change yet (!!!). The description changed, but the actual stat hasn't Yeh, I saw the description on SiSi and assumed it was a typo, especially since the Jag still says optimal too and in f...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.10 03:58:00
|
24. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
So.... Wolf with an optimal bonus. Why? Seriously, what was the intention behind reducing the damage projection of a ship with weak range control within scram? Prometheus Exenthal wrote: Wolf - It's fine It was :(
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.10 03:45:00
|
25. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
DARKSTAR POWNYOUALL wrote: I know its a flat increase to armor. And guess what percentage of its base armor the increase is? 20% ! i never said it was a 20% bonus to total EHP, which is a theoretical number that includes many things such a s...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.09 19:29:00
|
26. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
DARKSTAR POWNYOUALL wrote: I think that your post already confirmed you don't have a clue about frig combat anyway. For starters, buffing the weaker ones to the level of stronger ones = good thing (if done with care). Buffing the stronger ones ...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.09 18:46:00
|
27. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Mimiru Minahiro wrote: Can someone post the sig of wolf and Ishkur using halo set+loki booster? Doing the math in my head I think it is about 60 and 65 respectively (maybe a little less) Probably. I can also make a Hawk tank 1438 dps cap st...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.09 18:15:00
|
28. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
DARKSTAR POWNYOUALL wrote: T1'S couldn't kill a T2 BEFORE any suggested changes. So why make it so you need about 4-5 rifters just to engage a Wolf? You're aware the wolf isn't really more powerful than it was before right? If you wish to gan...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.09 18:06:00
|
29. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The Hawk The Hawk suffers due to a difficult combination in it's design philosophy, namely the mixture of an active shield tanked frigate as well as a ship that relies on missiles for damage. Due to the nature of active shield tanks, in order ...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.08 22:33:00
|
30. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Bloodpetal wrote: The Role Bonus to MWD is very poor. ...snip... I recommend a resistance to Webifier effectiveness, a resistance to Neutralizers - a general reduction to signature radius, regardless of MWD or not. It has been repeatedly di...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.08 22:32:00
|
31. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I've split the following into two posts, partly to allow me to rant at length, as I tend to do. But also to separate an overall summary of the issues with the assault frigate changes as well as what I feel is the major balance issue currently outs...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.08 22:32:00
|
32. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Ava Starfire wrote: frankly, 5 mids on any frigate is a terrible idea. Quite. Mid slots are incredibly powerful on a frigate level. While it's one thing adding them to ships that are low on them (retri/enyo), adding a 5th to the hawk is prob...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.07 19:14:00
|
33. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Takeshi Yamato wrote: Agree about the Hawk. It's the passive tanked ones that are so strong (which are most likely using that 2x Medium Shield Extender II setup that was being talked about early in the thread). Dual webs/MSE. Can use rage ...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.07 17:25:00
|
34. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Bob Niac wrote: Beeter for lowsec? So easy.. Role Bonus: Automated evasive manuvers. Assualt Ships have a 7.5% chance per level to avoid anchored munitions such as station and gate turrets and launchers. Add a random 'juke' animation while th...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.07 17:06:00
|
35. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Alex Medvedov wrote: Overpowered in relation with what? Overpowered in relation to bigger ships? Sure they are not. Overpowered in relation to each other? Sure they are. Enyo with 3 mids? Good luck to any Wolf pilot taking that down... I'...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.07 15:45:00
|
36. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Kaeda Maxwell wrote: Prometheus Exenthal wrote: The 4th bonus is universal, as are the extra slots, and they can be tweaked and adjusted. But the MWD bonus is the only one that seems to have struck a collective nerve. It doesn't force peopl...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.07 12:15:00
|
37. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Kalaratiri wrote: How many null sec players do you realistically think are going to fly them, for more then just the "ooh somethings been changed, lets go have a look" phase? As in, long term. The ones that currently solo in faction frigs or...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.06 21:52:00
|
38. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
edit: apparently I can't math
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.06 19:03:00
|
39. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
So, Marlona is just gonna troll without contributing any useful suggestions on here as well as FHC? vOv Cool I guess, whatever floats your boat. Anyway; Captain Aanderson wrote: Ed: if my fit is so bad, why is it the highest rated Hawk on Bat...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.06 18:28:00
|
40. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Assault Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Plutonian wrote: Tawa Suyo wrote: I would of course like to see the opinions of others ~based on SiSi testing~ (not based on EFT warrioring and random conjecture please). Your argument is flawed. SiSi cannot illustrate the affect a sup...
- by Tawa Suyo - at 2012.01.06 16:53:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |