Pages: [1] 2 |
1. [CSM8] CSM8 Town Hall #3: November 16 1900 EVE time - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote: Your trolling lacks wit. No. It lacks trolling. The point remains: what you're describing is not really a future visions since it rather describes the game today. Seagull, on the other hand, presents a vision for the...
- by Tippia - at 2013.11.15 08:28:00
|
2. [CSM8] CSM8 Town Hall #3: November 16 1900 EVE time - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote: I already read it as soon as it was released. This was my answer: Your vision lacks vision.
- by Tippia - at 2013.11.14 20:29:00
|
3. [CSM8] CSM8 Town Hall #3: November 16 1900 EVE time - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: I must ask, whose idea was it to give the PoCo tax income streams to player groups? Where else should they go? And what do you mean by GǣgivenGǥ? They're being introduced , not handed out. Either the income streams...
- by Tippia - at 2013.11.14 17:44:00
|
4. Where Does CSM Stand on the Some Blink Employee Giveaway? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Mike Azariah wrote: Exactly, the time stamp (aug 20( shows that we are looking at the same mistake, same timeline as before. m Nah. This looks like a completely new mistake. This is not Gǣwe're going to give you unique ships so you have so...
- by Tippia - at 2013.10.05 14:03:00
|
5. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: Whilst I love a good troll as much as anyone, I think I'll hold off on advocating that particular idea until I hear someone complaining that T2 manufacturing is too simple and straightforward. GǣT2 manufacturing is too simple ...
- by Tippia - at 2013.01.17 14:47:00
|
6. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: The basic idea is that you'd have some NPC corps that give really nice benefits and those would also be the ones with the harshest drawbacks/dangers. And you'd have 1-2 others that just tax you your 11% and don't do much for you...
- by Tippia - at 2013.01.17 14:26:00
|
7. POSes: I am a small portion of the community - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
GǪI also have to question the whole Gǣonly a small portionGǥ from a statistics standpoint. What are they actually looking at when they say that? To my mind, using the last available numbers, some 6.5% of characters lived in w-space. They are a...
- by Tippia - at 2013.01.17 14:02:00
|
8. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: In principle, that's absolutely the sort of thing what I'd like to see. However, your standings penalties are applied way too early. Civiliam stations should not as a matter of course shoot at other civilians unprovoked. Merely ...
- by Tippia - at 2013.01.17 12:10:00
|
9. POSes: I am a small portion of the community - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
SLOPS may be a corp of only four, but that's still 100% interaction and Gǣbeing touched byGǥ a POS revamp. Hell, the entire reasoning is circular since one of the key things about such a revamp would be to make more people interact with them. T...
- by Tippia - at 2013.01.17 11:48:00
|
10. Malcanis for CSM 8 (no troll this time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Just to go off on a complete tangentGǪ Malcanis wrote: [Basically, I think players should be able to choose which NPC corp they want to belong to, and different NPC corps should have different advantages and different drawbacks and challenges. ...
- by Tippia - at 2013.01.17 01:58:00
|
11. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: And what did we mostly hear about during CSM 6 Fixing the broken sov system that made null a no-go for everyone but the established actors; fixing the broken tech situation, which broke the game for everyone; cleaning up aft...
- by Tippia - at 2012.09.09 15:28:00
|
12. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: Funny first it was "this supposed belief that CSM is something that is GǣcontrolledGǥ and that it has nothing but nullsec representation, when neither is true and who can't be bothered to find out what it actually is." and ...
- by Tippia - at 2012.09.09 14:09:00
|
13. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: So how many members on CSM 6 were from Null? An irrelevant number of them, since the question was one of representation. Quote: And no Oh yes you did. Specifically, you said GǣSo yes I am in favour of thisGǥ (referrin...
- by Tippia - at 2012.09.09 13:46:00
|
14. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: Given that the CSM has been controlled for the majority of its existance by Null sec and now for only the last few months it hasn't been GǪthe problem is still the voters not caring, as shown by this supposed belief that CS...
- by Tippia - at 2012.09.09 13:35:00
|
15. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: This really is minorities are us. Yes, that's why it's a bad suggestion. A good suggestion would be one where the majority doesn't get discounted just because it's a majority.
- by Tippia - at 2012.09.09 13:10:00
|
16. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Come to think of it, the voting system isn't the actual problem. The problem is that what we're voting for is undefined. The CSM is not a decision-making body, so proportionality doesn't matter. it may be a ranked body, but only the top and the b...
- by Tippia - at 2012.09.08 18:09:00
|
17. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Two step wrote: The issue I have with STV is that making voting *harder* isn't going to increase voter turnout numbers. Certainly the system Trebor proposed has some downsides, but one thing it does get right is that the voters wouldn't have to...
- by Tippia - at 2012.09.08 17:37:00
|
18. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Alchenar wrote: This isn't STV. It's STV with a special addon specifically designed to disenfranchise voters. People aren't complaining that it's complicated. They are complaining that the proposal is deliberately designed to be undemocratic...
- by Tippia - at 2012.09.08 16:58:00
|
19. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
The reason STV is Gǣthe better systemGǥ is exactly because it is complicated. You can't have it both ways. If you want a simple system, it will be flawed. The current one is flawed in that votes on lower-end candidates are wasted because the ...
- by Tippia - at 2012.09.08 16:45:00
|
20. CSM 7 - We Should Not Accept This Behavior!! - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: Also it would be picked up by the media for sure that CCP is soft on cyber bullying and death threats. The funny/paradoxical thing about that is that, at this point, they'd probably be far better served to show their stance ...
- by Tippia - at 2012.03.28 13:06:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |