Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 |
2001. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: And standard haulers generally can't survived 10-15 T1 catalysts, no matter how much you tank them. Surviving 10GÇô15 catalysts in a hauler isn't particularly hard, and using 10GÇô15 catalysts means you operate at a loss if t...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 20:08:00
|
2002. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Gank destroyers have like 3900 EHP. In other words, they can be destroyed pretty much instantly by any kind of aggressive ship. Hell, even many DPS-based ships will simply volley them out of the sky (and yes, with them being ...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 19:39:00
|
2003. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ashley Eoner wrote: Price increases are deceptive as inflation is not being taken into account. It's far cheaper to use a couple catalysts then to use the BS of old. No, it really isn't. You see, you are forgetting the simple fact that battles...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 18:58:00
|
2004. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ashley Eoner wrote: So you're allowed to claim whatever but when I point out reality you want citations going back to the creation of the game. When you invent some nonsense that goes directly against every known and recorded fact going back t...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 18:46:00
|
2005. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ashley Eoner wrote: What massive nerfs? Numerous CONCORD buffs. Numerous target buffs. Numerous price increases. Numerous increases in penalties. Quote: Ganking is more common then ever. No. Just no. Even suggesting such a thing is pure ...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 18:35:00
|
2006. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ashley Eoner wrote: Hello cata thrasher buffs? The introduction of BS guns on BC platforms? You mean the things that not even managed to maintain the status quo in the face of the massive nerfs? The ones that led to ganks becoming more and mor...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 17:55:00
|
2007. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ashley Eoner wrote: Ganking is so easy these days thanks to the buffs What buffs? If it's so easy, why is it so rare?
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 17:40:00
|
2008. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
E-2C Hawkeye wrote: I am saying there are some but not enough options to fit tank. It is so easy and cost to little to gank freighters atm that people are doing it on empty freighters for the lulz. It has never been more difficult. It has neve...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 17:33:00
|
2009. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Carlos Brutus wrote: Oh yes, you're never 100% safe unless you're a scammer sitting in dock all day. Funny how that one always slips past the radar. Scammers have exactly the risks and rewards other players give them, and nothing more. Funny ...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 17:18:00
|
2010. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
E-2C Hawkeye wrote: They donGÇÖt need more help they need more options. They have every option in the book. How on earth do they need more?! Quote: A hauler should not need 1-3 more people or alts to solo haul. Then a ganker should not n...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 17:13:00
|
2011. If you had to start over in EVE what would you be? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mycool Jahksn wrote: Tippia wrote: Same as now: awesome. Wishful thinking from a lonely mr. know-it-all. AwwwGǪ someone has been left outside the club house and decided that it's probably all empty and boring inside.
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 15:31:00
|
2012. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
DJentropy Ovaert wrote: Andski wrote: Also, according to zKB, ONE FREIGHTER was suicide ganked yesterday, August 28th. Four were suicide ganked on August 27th. Freighter ganks are still exceptionally rare compared to the massive number of ...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 15:26:00
|
2013. The costs of PVP is too much for new players - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Black Panpher wrote: I see a lot of people saying you don't need t2 modules on a t1 frig. These people are idiots and will die to every other correctly fitted t1 frig. You know that T2 isn't always better, right? Only an idiot would suggest t...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 15:13:00
|
2014. War Decs as a griefing tool - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ramona McCandless wrote: Solution: Mine in a Blops with a Cyno on call Its expensive, takes a year to train up from nothing and your income will be miniscule But y'know risk vs rewardlol Incidentally, the Prospect can be blops-dropped into ...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 10:08:00
|
2015. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Velicitia wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Goodness, shooting someone for *fun* in a videogame? Call Scotland Yard. This is an international game, good sir. We call INTERPOL. They said they don't have jurisdiction ove...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 10:04:00
|
2016. Why the push to force people to work together? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Angeal MacNova wrote: Why would they do that when they can get it both passively and actively just by playing the game? Who cares. Do you have any kind of actual argument to offer or am I still to assume that you agree with me fully?
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 05:18:00
|
2017. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
DeMichael Crimson wrote: Well, that wasn't surprising. Thanks for confirming Eve Online has turned into Grief Online. GÇ£Turned into?GÇ¥ It never changed in that regard. Well, it made it a lot safer and easier to stay alive over time, but...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 05:06:00
|
2018. If you had to start over in EVE what would you be? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Same as now: awesome.
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 04:19:00
|
2019. High Sec Hauling/Mining Kills - TY CCP for No Protection - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Angeal MacNova wrote: They don't gank to loot. Some gank if the isk destroyed is less than isk lost. Substitute GÇ£pretty much no-oneGÇ¥ for GÇ£someGÇ¥ Quote: People will gank miners for various reasons and none of which have anything to d...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 03:25:00
|
2020. Why the push to force people to work together? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Angeal MacNova wrote: Tippia wrote: nonsense... So you agree then since you can't think of a single thing that you can actually contradict, disprove, or argue against and have to resort to abuse, red herrings, strawmen, and just flat out...
- by Tippia - at 2014.08.29 03:01:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |