Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 |
8001. The Great Ice Mining Interdiction: Not so Great - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
S Byerley wrote: What are you on about? Adding a variable into any sort of optimization is extremely expensive. I'm on about how the whole purpose of risk is that it lets us trivially include all kinds of costs (and gains) in a single formula ...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.21 06:08:00
|
8002. The Great Ice Mining Interdiction: Not so Great - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: You are correct. When suicide ganking the ship is the expendable ammo. A risk is not a risk if the outcome is certain. A risk requires an element of chance. No. A risk only requires an outcome (usually a cost) and a prob...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.21 06:02:00
|
8003. The Great Ice Mining Interdiction: Not so Great - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
S Byerley wrote: You don't have to wedge it into a risk to include it in the assessment (and you really shouldn't because dimensions are expensive, computation wise, and offsets are cheap). You should transform it to a risk, since it's silly ...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.21 05:26:00
|
8004. The Great Ice Mining Interdiction: Not so Great - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
S Byerley wrote: Really? No idea how the two tie together? Do business peoples have trouble with the concept of constant offsets? I have no idea what business people have trouble with (other than predicting economic trends), but that doesn't c...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.21 04:47:00
|
8005. The Great Ice Mining Interdiction: Not so Great - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
S Byerley wrote: Forgive me for not knowing all your fancy business major lingo, but I'm pretty sure when an expense is certain you don't run a risk assessment on it; rather you consider it overhead/operating cost/ w/e Sure you do, because tr...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.21 04:33:00
|
8006. The Great Ice Mining Interdiction: Not so Great - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
MeestaPenni wrote: It's different risks Tippia. You're mixing up the definitions. I guess. Sometimes, I get this whole GÇ£risk as defined by every risk assessment standard everGÇ¥ with GÇ£risk is what I say it is because it serves my purpos...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.21 04:21:00
|
8007. Tune in where? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote: Whats a twitter? It's the sound Leo Laporte makes when he's doubtful.
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.21 04:15:00
|
8008. The Great Ice Mining Interdiction: Not so Great - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
S Byerley wrote: Too lazy to read the entirety; are you still arguing that suicide cats (which work out to about the isk/hour of BS ammo) are inherently risky? Maybe you should read the entirety so you can check your assumptions. No. I'm stat...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.21 03:56:00
|
8009. The Great Ice Mining Interdiction: Not so Great - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
As always, risk = cost +ù probability. Just because the probability is 1 doesn't mean it's not a risk GÇö it just means that the risk is so hight that it has the same value as the cost.
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.21 03:47:00
|
8010. Eve Valkyrie - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Wolf Kruol wrote: Of course we have a say. We're investing in the project. Eve isn't a free game. No. We have no say in how CCP spends its money since we are not CCP investors and they have no responsibility to make us any money. We're just cu...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.21 03:00:00
|
8011. My Experience - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
E-2C Hawkeye wrote: As luck would have it....you are wrong . SP matter. GǪbut total SP does not, because it doesn't factor into anything other than the cost of your clone. So even though you called me wrong on something I never said, you com...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.21 02:53:00
|
8012. I have achieved middle class in Eve - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
You're off by about three orders of magnitude.
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.21 02:43:00
|
8013. Technical question: EVE Smallest Timestep/"quantum" of time - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
dexington wrote: Would it be interpolation is you use the same method of calculation?, is the point of interpolation that you are able to create the data between two point without doing the "heavy calculations"? Yes, that was a sloppy sentenc...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.20 13:18:00
|
8014. Technical question: EVE Smallest Timestep/"quantum" of time - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
IceGuerilla wrote: Consider a module that has a cycle time of 1.1 seconds and that I had a perfect reaction time and no latency to server. If the basic timestep were indeed 1 second and I tried to deactivate said module 1.05 seconds into its cy...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.20 12:33:00
|
8015. My Experience - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Spenser for Hire wrote: "...you can pursue your own goals. Stop looking to NPCs ...." contradiction. What if turning to NPCs is the player's own goal? Then he should not look to NPCs to solve his problems with NPCs (since the NPCs are apparent...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.20 09:13:00
|
8016. Technical question: EVE Smallest Timestep/"quantum" of time - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Trevor Dalech wrote: If you are not starting from a standstill, are changing direction, orbiting, or changing your acceleration in any way, your formula will not work. Not as simple slot-ins, no, but like I said GÇ£determined throughGÇ¥. Juggl...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.20 08:43:00
|
8017. Technical question: EVE Smallest Timestep/"quantum" of time - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
That's what the causality bubbles are forGǪ Anyway, turning and bumping is just acceleration along a different vector and are both just as predictable as any other movement. And again, the world simulation operates at 1Hz; the time step is 1 s...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.20 07:21:00
|
8018. Technical question: EVE Smallest Timestep/"quantum" of time - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Donbe Scurred wrote: Tippia, can you break those acceleration formulas down a little more for those that are not as informed as yourself? Such as myself. I realize there may not be an idiot's version, if so I understand you not taking the time....
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.20 06:00:00
|
8019. How to bring a Moros to Jita 4-4~?? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ken 1138 wrote: Capital ships in highsec would be very welcome change in my opinion. Maybe not Titans and supercarriers but at least carriers and dreads. To do what, exactly? And how would you ensure that they die in under 20 seconds when att...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.20 05:28:00
|
8020. Technical question: EVE Smallest Timestep/"quantum" of time - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cap (and shield) recharging, maybe, but that's mainly because I've never seen anyone come up with a proper function for it. Acceleration, if I've done my math right (which admittedly is doubtful) is just 10Gü¦/(I+ùM) +ù 1-v/vmax, and speed change...
- by Tippia - at 2013.08.20 05:04:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |