EVE Search - Posts by Verity Sovereign

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 141-160 of 1046 for by author Verity Sovereign (0,16 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50
141. Change Incursion Mechanics - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Yes, sometimes we enter a site, and see some wreck from a noob in a drake or a raven, or some BS like that, as I said: "these last two would have to be on the honor system, as there is no way to verify" If a lot of preloads are happening, its co... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.15 18:37:00
142. Change Incursion Mechanics - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Well, without conferring with anyone in any community, here's something I personally thought would be reasonable: * no killing the last high sec mom until withdraw -- Possibly: No killing the a high sec mom if the only other high sec mom is in a ... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.15 18:16:00
143. Incursion Frigate Only Sites - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Don't forget gleam for +25% tracking, no stacking penalty Still, I like Pulses... they don't need an Elutriation rig to run easily, they have double the tracking of tachs using standard ammo (even with scorch, they still track 20% better than tach... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.14 22:23:00
144. Change Incursion Mechanics - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Landogana Kelik wrote: You do know that there if proof, right? Please provide it then Quote: So everybody else gets to move when it's suitable for ISN? Sorry, doesn't work for us. We get to grind influence and then ISN comes to run at ma... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.14 21:11:00
145. Change Incursion Mechanics - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] How many times do we need to say that war decs won't work, as there are a multitude of corps/alliances involved... To the last post, there are more communities than that, and the ganking of charredass hasnothing to do with ISN. ISN did offer yo... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.14 18:40:00
146. Change Incursion Mechanics - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Did you just quote yourself? Did you mean to hit the edit button ? - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.14 16:46:00
147. Change Incursion Mechanics - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Jack Earthfire wrote: PART 5/6 The Difference between ISN and TVP/DIN/ICU or What's worth to fight for? Verity Sovereign wrote: One of DIN's complaints about ISN, is that they often contest weaker fleets, preventing the weaker fleets ... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.14 16:03:00
148. Change Incursion Mechanics - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Jack Earthfire wrote: PART 2/6 Negotiations: Ariak Rykard wrote: Perhaps the solution is simpler than having to change game mechanics. One party quits "contesting" everyone else. Everyone else won't bother to "blob" that one party. Si... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.14 15:57:00
149. Incursion ship question: HAC or BS? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread] Jane Schereau wrote: Thank you for your replies, quite informative. For some odd reason, I was convinced blasters were used in incursions. So no HAC then. I had no plans to invest any sp into rails, most especially larges. Is it even possible ... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.14 14:55:00
150. Change Incursion Mechanics - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Yes, most ISN members also have at least 1 other account... forming a counter blob is simply a matter of getting people to bring boxes. I also have more than 1 account. Mostly I take a poorly trained alt in an atron as a leaching box - the "main"... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.14 11:54:00
151. Change Incursion Mechanics - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] ShipToaster wrote: The problem with your argument is that there is no support for ISN outside ISN while over one hundred pilots flying for no payment shows a considerable level of support for DIN's scorched earth policy toward ISN. No need to ... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.14 11:24:00
152. Change Incursion Mechanics - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Alvatore DiMarco wrote: I read about halfway through the second page and then just gave up. So much drama. "When ISN enters a site, enter a different site" sounds an awful lot like "When ISN comes in to contest your site, abandon it and go to ... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.14 11:16:00
153. Change Incursion Mechanics - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Yes, as I've acknowledged, working as intended is a definite possibility here. "He doesn't like getting contested just as much as you don't like getting blobbed." This suggestion would make both cases irrelevant, if your above statement is true, ... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.14 07:21:00
154. Links and Capitals. What is the truth?? - in Ships and Modules [original thread] Moar bad descriptions from CCP? I'm shocked - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.13 22:42:00
155. Absolution PVE - in Ships and Modules [original thread] korrey wrote: Perhaps I should keep up with dev blogs...are they going to be changing Command Ships? Skill changes here (towars the bottom, about 3/4 of the way): http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=74234 - Basically... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.13 22:39:00
156. Change Incursion Mechanics - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Meh, I don't like those ideas... Large blobs already don't get paid.. but fining them... that makes no gameplay sense... Making the smaller fleet win... also makes no sense. What we have now is metagaming, perhaps the sort of emergent gameplay... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.13 22:18:00
157. Absolution PVE - in Ships and Modules [original thread] I've also been wondering about going from a BS to a T2 command ship for lvl 4s (my fall back isk when Incursions are stopped) I too was looking at an absolution, simply because I have trained my laser skills much better than anything else. I was ... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.13 20:49:00
158. Incursion Frigate Only Sites - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] DarthNefarius wrote: thoughts? I wishawhole new pirate incursion would get created that had new scout sites which could only be accessed with frigate only ships due to an acceleration gate restriction I like this idea, or perhaps simply buff... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.13 20:42:00
159. Change Incursion Mechanics - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] DarthNefarius wrote: -how would your system handle 3+ fleets contesting asingle site? sorry but I think it gets too complicated Very simple. THe game already keeps track of how much damage is done, that is how it determines who winds a cont... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.13 18:41:00
160. Change Incursion Mechanics - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Noble Ranger wrote: "#1 is implemented. In this case, no more wait lists for engaging in group PvE content.." We in ISN sort of "invented" using a waiting list, I'm not here to take credit for that, i would just say, no one is forcing anyone t... - by Verity Sovereign - at 2013.03.13 18:09:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.