Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Announcement:EVE Online: Ascension Deployment Updates - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dont lie its not a barista, its just CCP falcon and KCup machine.
- by Vigilanta - at 2016.11.15 11:43:49
|
2. WTS Standup Market Hub I BPO - in Sell Orders [original thread]
doubt you will accept but you can have a free bump 1.5 bil
- by Vigilanta - at 2016.11.11 04:53:17
|
3. Sticky:[Ascension] Engineering Complexes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Selak Zorander wrote: Vigilanta wrote: The Medium is where we need to have a chat. Giving it only fighters gives it very few defense options as the fighters are LOL bad and you know this. The mediums for all intents basically have no offens...
- by Vigilanta - at 2016.10.27 06:12:13
|
4. Sticky:[Ascension] Engineering Complexes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
So i've done some pretty extensive testing of the damage output ect. The larges and XL's are in a pretty solid place overall with on caveat, but ill get to that later. Following Assumptions made: No combat rigs as they defeat the purpose of the ...
- by Vigilanta - at 2016.10.26 15:04:15
|
5. Citadels are now on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Eli Stan wrote: Vigilanta wrote: was playing around today and noticed this. There is no repair option in citadels? If it exists i cant find it, seems like this is a relatively significant oversight as you have no way to repair modules or shi...
- by Vigilanta - at 2016.04.21 21:08:37
|
6. Citadels are now on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
was playing around today and noticed this. There is no repair option in citadels? If it exists i cant find it, seems like this is a relatively significant oversight as you have no way to repair modules or ships while docked. You could make it a se...
- by Vigilanta - at 2016.04.20 21:17:12
|
7. Citadels are now on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Claymore wrote: Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: Gigiarc wrote: Are there any special factors affecting the anchor time for citadels? I just threw out an XL and L in nullsec, and both are showing 6 days on the anchoring timers. you broke som...
- by Vigilanta - at 2016.04.18 21:35:39
|
8. Sticky:Fleet Warp Changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
If you had done more of this sooner I might still be giving you my money rather than other companies. It's a step in the right direction but a small one at that. You have alot of work to do if your going to win back your player base
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.09.07 19:32:26
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Transition and Deployment - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Vigilanta wrote: To the point brought up by evil weasel, he stated it in his response to me and he has a valid concern. If the zero point on a planet has a structure on it you cannot launch a station there until the object ...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.07.07 18:35:49
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Transition and Deployment - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Aryth wrote: Yroc Jannseen wrote: So you guys are going to at the very least, be allowing us to turn off or remove Ihub upgrades before this change right? Because I can see several systems with dual hubs where the one with more upgrades al...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.07.07 18:34:06
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Transition and Deployment - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Vigilanta wrote: would not the more appropriate step be rather than things magically exploding in space they get delivered to the owning corporations hq office deliveries. You are inherently forcing us to take time + addi...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.07.07 18:29:31
|
12. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Transition and Deployment - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
EvilweaselSA wrote: do ihubs/tcus block pocos, and vice versa? pocos are the anchoring arrow drag drop, they dont need to be on the zero point just a general zone, same with tcus and ihubs (its in the blog the actual ranges)
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.07.07 16:13:58
|
13. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Transition and Deployment - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
would not the more appropriate step be rather than things magically exploding in space they get delivered to the owning corporations hq office deliveries. It seems a bit punative. additionally CCP are the ones changing the game mechanics why sho...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.07.07 15:43:56
|
14. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Towers are now not only able to defend themselves (somewhat) but also can have more ehp than sov structures and cannot be shot by supercarriers. Pretty nice, all things considered. Im not sure if your in somewhat agreeing with me or ...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.03.10 06:09:52
|
15. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Vigilanta wrote: So basically work on the vulnerability, the 4 hour window must go. 24 hours, or some sort of scaled window seem to be the better option for a worldwide single shard game. Vulnerability shouldn't just hap...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.03.10 06:02:06
|
16. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Veskrashen wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: you can also break gatecamps with sufficient pvp force so again i have to wonder why you hold them in such contempt Because they don't want to have "military superior...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.03.10 05:59:53
|
17. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
In all honesty, I think you may be starting in the wrong place. The entosis modules balance is tied in heavily with vulnerability mechanics for systems. I think that is where you really need to conisder starting in order to properly balance the en...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.03.10 05:54:27
|
18. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
davet517 wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: That's Malcanis' law. Jenn's law is "No matter how many times reality proves Malcanis' law is true, people, including professional game developers, will forget the past 11 seconds later, like big ass human...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.03.09 04:41:46
|
19. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dersen Lowery wrote: Having watched the discussions about wealth in nullsec as an outsider, there are clearly a lot of assumptions made by various parties about the terms of the discussion--"optimal/suboptimal" becomes "possible/impossible," ...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.03.06 21:27:11
|
20. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
lilol' me wrote: Vigilanta wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: Mike Azariah wrote: https://soundcloud.com/eve-down-under/eve-down-under-episode-97-060315 is the link of Fozzie being interviewed on Eve Down Under. You may want to skip the first 5 ...
- by Vigilanta - at 2015.03.06 21:18:32
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |