| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. CCP: If you tell people to stop playing enough times, they just might. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Karlemgne Your tears are sweet. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out, kid. -Karlemgne ...And yet another proof that the "niche PvP community" that Eve apparently caters to consist largely of nerdy lose...
- by Whineroy - at 2009.07.30 10:11:00
|
2. Low Sec and New Players - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Very interesting "lesson" to a newcomer indeed. Excellent way to teach a newcomer to stay away from lowsec entirely. Now to just wait for the inevitable next episode of "Waah ! Not enough people in lowsec ! CCP, nerf empire !" supplied by ganker n...
- by Whineroy - at 2009.07.25 10:58:00
|
3. Probed down but no combat probes in sight - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: ollobrains lets keep it as is more high sec empire mission runners going pop the better Indeed, keep it up. Make lowsec missioning extremely dangerous, so that people will avoid missioning in lowsec even more than they a...
- by Whineroy - at 2009.07.14 06:49:00
|
4. Salvaging wrecks while mission running isn't a crime in highsec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Malcanis I have reconsidered my simple solution for an even simpler one: Remove combat missions from high sec. All those nasty pirate battleships have no place in CONCORD's fluffy wonderland anyway. I've got an even...
- by Whineroy - at 2009.06.26 12:06:00
|
5. why people want level 4's moved to low sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Whineroy on 26/05/2009 16:06:58 Originally by: Lear Hepburn So run L3s. Your income will drop relative to those who take the risks, which is what Eve is supposed to be about. Risks ? Like people who sell GTCs/PLEXes take...
- by Whineroy - at 2009.05.26 16:05:00
|
6. Game Over: "Control" Of 0.0 Space Has Been Won - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Arthur Frayn Goons earned their position in 0.0 by being no-life losers who have nothing to do except to focus on trying to be big and bad in an online game. Quit whining. There, corrected it for you. The above truth can...
- by Whineroy - at 2009.05.07 05:25:00
|
7. Next to be Nerfed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Furious Foot I'd still hope for high sec l4 missions being nerfed above all else - they just rack in too much isk without any risk If you *really* want to get rid of "too much ISK without any risk", get rid of ISK selle...
- by Whineroy - at 2009.04.10 21:20:00
|
8. Remove Carebears! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Funny to see all the people whining about "L4 missions being too easy ISK for too little risk" when anyone with RL money to spare can start trading GTCs, an activity that makes L4 missions look like high-risk activity in comparison. I do agree tha...
- by Whineroy - at 2009.03.06 07:19:00
|
9. Hey Eve vets lets give all these new M10 chars a warm welcome! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Malcanis Originally by: Ruze For the most part, it's fun to laugh at the players who get so serious about their gaming. People who die and go into fits about how they are going to come to your house and physically hu...
- by Whineroy - at 2009.02.28 10:06:00
|
10. Why is bob closed? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Hurtado Soneka Since this is the greatest thing to happen to eve since the castor expansion I would whole heartly like to thank Goons ala the white knight for slaying Bob ala the evil dragon. Playing this game close to 5 ye...
- by Whineroy - at 2009.02.05 08:12:00
|
11. Suicide Ganking- still too easy - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Malcanis I love how whiney carebears think that demanding even more NPC protection is "making the game harsher". Were you one of those kids whose mom abused the ref for allowing "unfairness" whenever your junior soccer le...
- by Whineroy - at 2009.01.02 11:19:00
|
12. Current Game Mechanic Exploit -10 sec pirates plundering in empire. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Whineroy on 28/12/2008 12:32:04 Originally by: Chronos VIII Yes, please ban us from the entire universe of eve. Deal with it carebear. WoW is this way ---> I spy / With my little eye / Yet another gankbear who really...
- by Whineroy - at 2008.12.28 12:31:00
|
13. wth did you do to my missiles? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Szent AdamKiraly bleed carebears bleed mwuhahahhaah. You know, losers who make fortunes ratting at 0.0 while their butt-buddies ensure that they have zero risk doing so shouldn't exactly talk about "carebears" unless the...
- by Whineroy - at 2008.11.12 09:21:00
|
14. Level 4 missions; bad zulupark - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kransthow Thats fine, we just want the risk we take to be justified with equivalent reward. I could care less if you bring you nighthawk into lowsec or not, it's just your safety should come with a premium. Now that y...
- by Whineroy - at 2008.10.29 06:41:00
|
15. pvp players back off alright - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Maximillian Bayonette Why should I back off? You carebears taught the Eve community how to get changes made: whine, whine and then whine some more. Now it's our turn. Live with it or quit. Nawh, everything one needs to ...
- by Whineroy - at 2008.09.08 13:37:00
|
16. A PvP'ers Manifesto - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Vikarion And I note that CCP tend to moderate people who attack carebears, but carebears are left untouched. Very nice. If CCP *really* moderated people who attack whining carebears, they'd moderate every single darn ...
- by Whineroy - at 2008.09.06 07:27:00
|
17. Why we need a SIGNIFICANT nerf on lvl4s in hisec. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Whineroy on 22/08/2008 14:45:51 Originally by: Maximillian Bayonette I don't. However, the CSM WILL bring this up to CCP. CCP will then have to look at it seriously. They are then faced with the decision of wether to act as...
- by Whineroy - at 2008.08.22 14:44:00
|
18. Why do people care so much about other peoples doings? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If people insist that CCP should move higher-reward missions to lowsec so that there is more risk to mission runners, then at same time CCP should fix (at last) bounty/bounty hunting system so that "pirates" get to be victims too. Would create a n...
- by Whineroy - at 2008.08.20 14:26:00
|
19. why they shouldnt move l4 missions to low sec only - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kahega Amielden And if I may quote the official FAQ again Quote: Oh, and I could quote your own little Ninja Salvager Guide for lots examples regarding "mission runner carebear tears" and similar, which reveal that ...
- by Whineroy - at 2008.08.17 17:56:00
|
20. why they shouldnt move l4 missions to low sec only - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Adjusting high-sec mission rewards ? Fine, as long as it comes with functional player-level bounty hunter system so that "pirates" hunting for mission runners get to enjoy the feeling of being victims too. That bounty system overhaul is long overd...
- by Whineroy - at 2008.08.17 08:07:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |