EVE Search - Posts by Wulfnor

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 1-20 of 458 for by author Wulfnor (0,05 seconds)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20
1. New Dev Blog: Livin' on a Prayer - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Originally by: ElvenLord Originally by: CCP Fear But expect some Unicorns and Space Dragons obviously! What happened to pink flying ponies? Sigh. What do you think the t2 version of the Unicorn is? Really ElvenLord didn... - by Wulfnor - at 2010.03.10 16:25:00
2. New Dev Blog: Organizational tools, standings and other changes - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] The calendar is nice and the only problem I see with it is that you might over load the permissions system you have. Based on previous discussions regarding permissions it seems to are putting more and more on the few bits you allocated for permis... - by Wulfnor - at 2010.02.26 18:34:00
3. mark ships as corp owend items - prevent corp theft - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Wulfnor on 19/12/2009 15:55:10 Originally by: CCP Soundwave Originally by: Pan Dora Whille I agree that better Corp control over Corp assets its needed, enforced trust its not the way to solve it. I agree. ... - by Wulfnor - at 2009.12.19 15:53:00
4. Removal of /map/SovereigntyStatus.xml.aspx API - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread] Thing is Chronotis whatever good this may have done in your eyes it has also done one other thing: notification of SBUs now only goes to directors of sov holding corp. Given the short time frame of SBU online this makes sov warfare even more depen... - by Wulfnor - at 2009.12.08 17:23:00
5. The Battle For The High Ends. - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Originally by: El Muchacha NC : NC, the most hated alliance in eve has reformed. Seriously? THE MOST hated alliance? Hot diggity dog finally good for something. - by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.15 21:29:00
6. New Dev Blog: Dominion--Storming the Gates - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Originally by: SpaceMonkey99 I might be missing something, and it is unrelated to the soverignty holding/disruption mechanic which you guys are talking about, but when the TCU's go online based on the sovereignty held prior to dominion lau... - by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.12 03:42:00
7. New Dev Blog: Dominion--Storming the Gates - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Who is supposed to get the mails for attacks on Hubs, stations, TCUs or when SBUs are anchored? Corp or alliance? - by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.11 22:56:00
8. New Blog: Upgrading and Upkeep of Sovereign Solar Systems in Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Originally by: CCP Chronotis Originally by: Arkady Sadik For those who missed it, current SiSi prices (which can change still, of course): TCU: 1m ISK / day Hub: 5m ISK / day Jump bridge: 10m ISK / day Cyno gen: 2m ISK / day Cyno ... - by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.11 20:49:00
9. New Dev Blog: Dominion--Storming the Gates - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Originally by: Darth Sith For clarity: So if I understand this correctly, to produce a supercap, an alliance has to get sov, anchor resource hub, anchor capital upgrade and pay a monthly premium for the priviledge but to destroy said capit... - by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.11 20:23:00
10. New Dev Blog: Dominion--Storming the Gates - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Originally by: CCP Sisyphus Originally by: sg3s Edited by: sg3s on 11/11/2009 16:34:43 I made a chart that is simpler to understand, tbh the blog chart doesn't look at it from a players perspective even though it is the same, i... - by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.11 18:25:00
11. All Rents tab - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] As long as you are adding new things that we can be charged for can you please put back the ALL RENTS tab that will allow us to have a list of the offices sov etc that we are paying for on a regular basis? You may not think it is useful but it is... - by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.02 17:06:00
12. Current Soverignty Holders - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Edited by: Wulfnor on 02/11/2009 15:54:50 If that is your view then I suggest you will have to wait and lobby CSM to get CCP to place blank 0.0 regions in Eve placed ASAP :) - by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.02 15:54:00
13. Manufacturing time change needed for t2 processor components - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] It would seem to me that the two changes to the bpo were made for two different reasons. The time was changed to see how that would affect the large requirements and the amount differences were made to lower the need for two mid range metals chrom... - by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.01 17:47:00
14. Current Soverignty Holders - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Originally by: HeliosGal the big stuff up in my book was retaining true sec status rather than flattening it and then making it depend on upgrades. Ah well maybe the large alliances have been screaming and ccp is listening to their howls o... - by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.01 16:37:00
15. Sov concerns / questions - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] My hope is that all attacks on FLAGs, STOPs, Hubs and stations will generate alliance mails rather than corp mails but at present it is too early to tell. Making all these mails are at the corporate level would seem to make alliance level defense ... - by Wulfnor - at 2009.11.01 16:23:00
16. Big over looked problem with new Sov System - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Originally by: CCP Incognito Edited by: CCP Incognito on 21/10/2009 13:09:29 What happens is the upgrades are destroyed when the infrastructure hub is destroyed or un-anchored. And the roles for determining who can unanchor or on... - by Wulfnor - at 2009.10.21 14:06:00
17. CSM 3 Meeting 8 - Sunday september 27th 16:00 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Edited by: Wulfnor on 28/09/2009 17:01:01 wow here is an issue,term limits, that got more votes in the CSM than in the thread that started it. This a bad decision. No one in favor of it has explained how putting CCP in the position of decidi... - by Wulfnor - at 2009.09.28 16:59:00
18. [Dominion Patch] Moon mining & Marauder Prices? - in Market Discussions [original thread] Well unless that slider starts at something substantially higher than 20% I doubt it will viewed as more than a fluctuation. - by Wulfnor - at 2009.09.26 16:11:00
19. [Dominion Patch] Moon mining & Marauder Prices? - in Market Discussions [original thread] Originally by: Scorellia Dex Originally by: Banana Torres What effect are the devs trying to have by changing the materials needed to make t2 ships? ... They want to make the 0.0 economy a bit bigger than just high-end moon min... - by Wulfnor - at 2009.09.26 02:58:00
20. RAZOR Resets: Tears Edition - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Originally by: sinsation Originally by: Kuar Z'thain Originally by: Phreeze Minor Threat. You can't reset non-existent entities. Sure we can, we had Hydra blue for like 6 months after they disbanded until we fi... - by Wulfnor - at 2009.09.23 23:36:00
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.