Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
1. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Desmond Strickler wrote: Alliances can ban them, doesn't mean they still can't use them. What do you mean you won't eat the poop? You asked for sweetcorn look there are a couple of bits in there. Ignore what your mother says I bet the swee...
- by Yeep - at 2014.01.21 21:21:00
|
2. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP SoniClover wrote: * With an active ESS in system, bounties pay out LP in addition to normal ISK reward. LP reward starts at 0.15 LP per 1000 ISK and can increase to 0.2 LP per 1000 ISK as the bonus payout increases. As an example, a bounty...
- by Yeep - at 2014.01.21 15:11:00
|
3. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Mah Boobz wrote: Juliette Asanari wrote: Yeep wrote: At least with tags you could outsource the shipping for a cut of your profit but with LP you have to fly that exact character all the way into empire and back to claim your reward. ...
- by Yeep - at 2014.01.21 14:28:00
|
4. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP SoniClover wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: An actual good start. The most obvious question is "LP from who"? CONCORD is the most obvious answer, if so prepare you self for HUGE cries of foul from the only other people who get CONCORD LP (Incu...
- by Yeep - at 2014.01.21 14:18:00
|
5. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tahnil wrote: As has been pointed out before: even if I accept it as a fact that any given system may only support four to six ratters at the same time, this is not the problem. Because (a) not all people are ratting at once and (b) given that...
- by Yeep - at 2014.01.17 16:32:00
|
6. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: If CCP had not mentioned the 5% nerf to nullsec income in the same dev blog, this module would be a fairly solid success. No, it wouldn't. Because there would still be no reason for a spaceholder to deploy it thems...
- by Yeep - at 2014.01.17 15:45:00
|
7. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Zircon Dasher wrote: Wyn Pharoh wrote: It will take 3 HOURS of uninterrupted ratting, according to the new mechanics, to reach break even with where we are at today. That is false. Assume current RatBounty = 100k Without ESS: 95k goes...
- by Yeep - at 2014.01.17 15:18:00
|
8. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: Scenario 1: You are part of a big alliance ratting. Hostiles enter the area and are reported on intel channels. Warp to it and hit share all bounties, and suddenly there isn't very much left in the thing for hostiles t...
- by Yeep - at 2014.01.17 00:38:00
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: I understand you feel that way, but disagree with you. It is an object anyone can deploy to increase their income. To benefit from it, you must harvest it after ratting for a while. It can be harvested by hostiles, too...
- by Yeep - at 2014.01.17 00:17:00
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: If presented with an ESS region and a non-ESS region, I'd probably go to the region with ESS's deployed. At the same time, that means the region with ESS's deployed will have more content defending their space. While m...
- by Yeep - at 2014.01.16 18:33:00
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tahnil wrote: CCP has to get it right, but they also have to tackle it. The current iteration of ESS has itGÇÿs flaws, but there has to be some kind of ESS. CCP need to drop the idea that an ESS is ever going to be something a spaceholder w...
- by Yeep - at 2014.01.16 17:29:00
|
12. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tahnil wrote: The ratters with the best network would have the best income, because they would get the 5% income buff provided by ESS more often than ratters without this network and good friends, helping each other out. No, they wouldn't. ...
- by Yeep - at 2014.01.16 17:04:00
|
13. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tahnil wrote: They shouldnGÇÿt. They should do whatever they are doing. But IF somebody shows up, there should be some chance for small scale PvP. Currently there is nearly none at all. There might be a gank, and very rarely some locals decide...
- by Yeep - at 2014.01.16 16:53:00
|
14. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: The other is policing your space. Most nullsec alliances don't bother, as there is nothing out & about that can't get safe quickly, and there is nothing the "small gang raiders" can do to harm your infrastructure. ...
- by Yeep - at 2014.01.16 16:39:00
|
15. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
How about this: Drop the 5% global decrease in bounties and any ability to increase bounties above 100% Make the deployable siphon 20% of all bounties across the whole constellation its deployed in (perhaps even make a hauler sized one tha...
- by Yeep - at 2014.01.16 15:52:00
|
16. SOV tearing down the old. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Onictus wrote: Destructable stations are still a bad idea. I'd be ok with destructible stations if all your assets appeared in the closest NPC station after a delay of say a week. You could even have NPC haulers people could attack to slow t...
- by Yeep - at 2013.11.01 15:30:00
|
17. EVE ONLINE RESET - NEW SHARD - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I take it you're volunteering to port 10 years of security and bugfixes (and any future ones) to an old codebase, modify the parts of code that were designed to run on 10 year old hardware to use modern hardware, pay for a second set of servers an...
- by Yeep - at 2013.11.01 14:33:00
|
18. SOV tearing down the old. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marlona Sky wrote: Yeep wrote: Where timers are necessary (and they are necessary) there should be room for human error in setting them I'm not saying it is right or wrong, but I was wondering if you would go more in depth on why timers an...
- by Yeep - at 2013.11.01 10:23:00
|
19. SOV tearing down the old. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marlona Sky wrote: We spend so much time arguing over how to get there and no one really asks themselves, "What exactly is there ?" Obviously this will vary from person to person, but I am really interested in what 'there' means to each of yo...
- by Yeep - at 2013.11.01 00:46:00
|
20. Sticky:Dev Blog: No Honor Among Thieves - Siphon Units in Rubicon - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: In eve as in RL the big guy gets to keep the ball, until someone bigger comes along to take it from him. You could be smaller and smarter but in reality the smarter people are either also quite big or are content with thei...
- by Yeep - at 2013.10.31 17:10:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |