Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
1. C5, C6 Mass discussion in regards to capitals. - in Wormholes [original thread]
With the coming of new capital modules (plates). Masses for C5 and C6 wormholes are going to have to be changed and altered to take this in to account. At the summit I brought up the subject of maybe allowing more capitals though a wormhole. Whic...
- by corbexx - at 2016.03.10 18:59:08
|
2. Yachts, yachts, yachts. - in Wormholes [original thread]
We're still looking for feedback on these in regard to rolling wormholes. Some ideas that have been presented. Make it so higgs riggs can't be fit on them. Make higgs riggs remove nulification. Make higgs remove Cov ops cloak. Make it so yachts ...
- by corbexx - at 2016.03.10 18:46:15
|
3. Noobman for CSM XI. W-space Candidate - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Jim Womack wrote: promise not to run off and join goons if you get elected? ooh the burn ...would it help if i said i'd rather have noobman than someone from your corp?
- by corbexx - at 2015.12.25 05:28:52
|
4. Sticky:[Focus Group] Capital Ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: You really couldn't have a more biased focus group if you tried. I feel sorry for the couple of WH guys - The odds of being listened to are well against you. As for the rest of Eve, again we get change to suit the worst aspec...
- by corbexx - at 2015.11.12 00:11:22
|
5. Two Step: killing the gravy train... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Tug Speedman wrote: My proposal be broadcast chain to all eve and let the content come to you. More frag, more fun! that sounds like using null sec and dotlan, goons is recruiting.
- by corbexx - at 2015.09.18 18:02:28
|
6. Two Step: killing the gravy train... - in Wormholes [original thread]
Winthorp wrote: Onto escalations as i have said in the trweetfleet wormholes slack channel, i believe we are about to get a WH escalations nerf. Day 1 of the summit minutes discusses WH PVE and then NDA's the discussion. Combine this with our ...
- by corbexx - at 2015.09.18 12:45:03
|
7. new scanning user interface testing on sisi - in Wormholes [original thread]
Tipa Riot wrote: corbexx wrote: We ask you kindly to not distribute this link. Oops. Not a issue I copied the parts I was ment to. Although I've taken it out and people will have to message me to get that link till I get clarity from ...
- by corbexx - at 2015.09.11 12:06:15
|
8. new scanning user interface testing on sisi - in Wormholes [original thread]
Team Psycho Sisters invite you to try out our new Scanning interface on the Singularity test server. We have made some changes to the interface based on feedback on the new map, and have pulled scanning out of the map entirely to reside in its own...
- by corbexx - at 2015.09.11 10:22:53
|
9. Recently occuring wormhole bugs - in Wormholes [original thread]
apparently gas clouds are also respawning which i've let ccp know about as well. and this stuff is being looked at but no eta i'm affraid.
- by corbexx - at 2015.08.19 17:34:22
|
10. Structure blog and sounding board - in Wormholes [original thread]
Thanks very much to everyone who attended, apolgies to people I had to turn down. I won't lie after the last one I was very concerned. Its one of the reasons I was so strick and wanted to limit numbers. As it was my 15 to 20 turned in to 35 even ...
- by corbexx - at 2015.08.18 19:16:16
|
11. Structure blog and sounding board - in Wormholes [original thread]
i'd really rather not i'm trying to keep stuff as simple as possible. If we do that then everyone will want to do taht and its going to make it a huge pain in the ******* arse for me to keep track of.
- by corbexx - at 2015.08.18 12:27:25
|
12. Structure blog and sounding board - in Wormholes [original thread]
closing this now as we are super full. I still need to hear from hk and ssc on who they want to go we're more than I wanted tbh so people will have to be on best behavor. if people cause issues i'll just kick them. There will be no need to rec...
- by corbexx - at 2015.08.18 11:15:49
|
13. Structure blog and sounding board - in Wormholes [original thread]
Owing to the amount of people who have posted I'm going to have to limit it to 2 per alliance, So if SSC, HK and Isogen5 can let me know which 2 people they want to attend that would be sweet. Apologies again to SSC and TDSIN, for having to canc...
- by corbexx - at 2015.08.17 09:24:14
|
14. Structure blog and sounding board - in Wormholes [original thread]
Galdur Trudaihnel wrote: Will there be a discussion about putting the number of WH space to null connections and the time they are open for back to previous levels ? there maybe. but that wont be this one. and it would be pointless to bri...
- by corbexx - at 2015.08.14 12:02:53
|
15. Structure blog and sounding board - in Wormholes [original thread]
Maria Kitiare wrote: With a limitation at 20 attending, it might be a good idea to get a nice spread from the different areas of w-space instead of just first comes first served. Anyway, x'ing up. But also asking, If I end up not being able t...
- by corbexx - at 2015.08.13 18:06:34
|
16. Structure blog and sounding board - in Wormholes [original thread]
Braxus Deninard wrote: Signing up for the structure soundboard as well. I enjoy a lot of these changes but think the asset safety is a significant concern in w-space. asset safety is up for discussion in w space.
- by corbexx - at 2015.08.13 16:11:32
|
17. Structure blog and sounding board - in Wormholes [original thread]
The next structure blog is up http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/citadels-sieges-and-you/ CCP Nullabor is happy to come along and listen to people discuss issues on this topic. It will be 17.00 eve time 18th of August. This will ...
- by corbexx - at 2015.08.13 15:17:22
|
18. Citadel Question - W-Space rules - in Wormholes [original thread]
Chance Ravinne wrote: Corbexx unless I've misunderstood the reinforcement cycling, and I am fairly certain I haven't, initial reinforcement does not disable any structure functionality. Without getting into stuff we can't talk about, the preli...
- by corbexx - at 2015.08.09 15:36:34
|
19. Citadel Question - W-Space rules - in Wormholes [original thread]
Market McSelling Alt wrote: Wait, can one of the CSM guys or fake WH CSM guys tell us how they plan on letting us "put up any size Citadel you can get in" but prevent us from making supers/titans in our holes? Are the modules themselves for bui...
- by corbexx - at 2015.08.09 15:31:36
|
20. Citadel Question - W-Space rules - in Wormholes [original thread]
Chance Ravinne wrote: The entosis system certainly draws a line in the sand. If a structure is going to sit abandoned 99% of the time, it is going to be a sitting duck. Luckily basic trolling attempts will be shrugged off since the attackers ar...
- by corbexx - at 2015.08.09 15:00:30
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |