Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 |
81. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Captator I am also enjoying this thread, perhaps the mathematics are working as a charm against most whine orientated people? Its cos most of the "WAAA ECM NERF NERF" and the "STFU NOOB IT FINE" tards did not understan...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.19 00:26:00
|
82. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: lebrata on 18/01/2009 23:33:31 Originally by: Captator Originally by: lebrata Also all the other system do their thing very effectively on any ship you care to fit them on, ecm sucks and is worthless on anything but...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.18 23:27:00
|
83. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: chrisss0r then again ecm does alot of things at once. Kills turret tracking and range just as missiles range, kills remote rep, reduces locking range and locktime and all of it to zero. while the other ew disturb a very imp...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.18 22:20:00
|
84. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: lebrata on 18/01/2009 21:58:36 Originally by: Captator Originally by: lebrata Originally by: Captator Counter to turret fire = TDs/ECM ( a) ) Counter to drones = smartbombs/ECM (can't deploy and get auto...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.18 21:56:00
|
85. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: lebrata on 18/01/2009 21:10:35 Lilith Velkor, love u loads with hugs and snuggles but OMG DELETE YOUR EDIT LIST AT THE TOP OF YOUR POSTS...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.18 21:09:00
|
86. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: lebrata on 18/01/2009 21:09:53 Originally by: Captator Counter to turret fire = TDs/ECM ( a) ) Counter to drones = smartbombs/ECM (can't deploy and get auto aggro if jammed before drones launched) ( b)/c) ) Counter to mis...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.18 21:08:00
|
87. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Captator Originally by: lebrata You seem to be defining that a "counter to ECM" must kill the ship using it while the reality is that the counter to ECM is ECCM. Small ships by their nature have faster lock times and...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.18 18:35:00
|
88. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: lebrata on 18/01/2009 18:23:58 Originally by: Captator Originally by: lebrata The vulture has good range and a reasonable buffer tank, as well as a good sig str that would benefit a lot from a eccm unit, plus the abi...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.18 18:23:00
|
89. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: lebrata on 18/01/2009 18:18:41 Originally by: Cohkka The point is that ECM in its current form is too much of an advantage (at least on falcons), it can't be effectively countered unless you dedicate some ships to it. S...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.18 18:17:00
|
90. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Captator There needs to be a sub BS ship that is better at getting rid of falcons than a falcon is (for example). The vulture has good range and a reasonable buffer tank, as well as a good sig str that would benefit a...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.18 18:10:00
|
91. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: lebrata on 18/01/2009 17:16:13 Originally by: Captator Originally by: lebrata Why is it that your gangs ALWAYS lack ewar and versatility when your talk about these scenarios?. YES a gang of 4-6 ships that has with 2...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.18 17:16:00
|
92. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Captator You miss my point, that is not my concern, my concern is that an arazu+falcon combo with damp boost and without ECM changes will be a guaranteed 4-6 ship out of the fight, which is basically the entire gang, so th...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.18 15:52:00
|
93. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: lebrata on 17/01/2009 16:26:35 Originally by: Camilo Cienfuegos Quote: Considering how ecm works you cannot predict it working worse in the first 40 seconds than it does in the latter 40. "Lies, Damn Lies and Stat...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.17 16:25:00
|
94. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Camilo Cienfuegos Originally by: lebrata It seems to me that if this thread has done anything it has shown that ECCM in its currant form is much more effective than the individuals who have been dismissing it (appare...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.17 16:15:00
|
95. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: lebrata on 17/01/2009 16:10:55 Originally by: AZN Steve I did a little test in a blackbird with cruiser at lvl 4 and no ew skills except ew skill itself at lvl 2 . put 2 best named racial ecm on , no amps , and permajammed ...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.17 16:08:00
|
96. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Camilo Cienfuegos Based on the evidence this thread has brought forward, I've proposed a new idea for ECCM in the features and ideas discussion forum. That thread can be seen here . It seems to me that if this thread ha...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.17 15:45:00
|
97. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Camilo Cienfuegos Quote: i feel a BS + ewar ship VS 2 close range BS should be favorable towards the ewar/BS team as its a much more tactical setup than just tank/gank. It certainly is, which is why if it's mat...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.16 20:56:00
|
98. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Camilo Cienfuegos If we assume (a common scenario) two close range battleships fitted with ECCM versus one close range battleship with a long range support Falcon, the battleships aren't going to be able to touch the Falco...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.16 20:39:00
|
99. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Terianna Eri Originally by: Etho Demerzel Now, if both battleships were using ECCMs, your gang (Falcon+Battleship) would be in trouble. You can repeat the calculations for a 0.25 base chance and you will see that in ...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.16 20:22:00
|
100. Ecm Jamming Chance and Bayesian Probability - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: lebrata on 16/01/2009 20:15:32 Originally by: Etho Demerzel Lets suppose that you have two gangs. One is composed by 2 battleships, the second is composed by a falcon and one battleship. By your own results in 120 seconds y...
- by lebrata - at 2009.01.16 20:12:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |