EVE Search - Posts by oiukhp Muvila

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 81-100 of 203 for by author oiukhp Muvila (0,03 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10
81. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] baltec1 wrote: .... Ganking has never been harder, more expensive or more punished than today. It is also at its lowest point in recorded history of this game. I think ganking was a lot less common when I first starting playing back in lat... - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2017.04.03 04:30:27
82. If CODE owns highsec... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] CODE. is just a bunch of in-game sociopaths who get their kicks by picking on the easy targets of Hi Sec. They do add texture to the game though. I don't think Eve would be Eve without allowing groups like them. I just think the balance has been ... - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2017.04.03 04:18:25
83. How many more players must we lose to bullying - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Remiel Pollard wrote: Mr Epeen wrote: Remiel Pollard wrote: I take what I'm passionate about seriously... Much like Tippia before you, the only thing you seem passionate about is getting in the last word. Mr Epeen So when I disag... - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2017.04.03 03:54:36
84. Make Capital Ships Strong Again and bring back Jobs for Cap Pilots - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Mark Marconi wrote: The Mittani has already stated.... I'm surprised players still listen to that fool. Posts like that are self-serving. - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.11.18 20:29:49
85. Got a bounty on your head? Want it for yourself? READ! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Must be an Alpha Clone alt of someone who hasn't paid since 2k8. - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.11.18 03:52:46
86. Make Capital Ships Strong Again and bring back Jobs for Cap Pilots - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] 0.15 / 10 A bit over the top. - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.11.18 03:50:16
87. Damage dampener device to counter focus fire - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Donnachadh wrote: oiukhp Muvila wrote: Focus fire on a single target or a very small area of a larger target by and entire force is a waste of resources for any military in any time. This comment serves to illustrate a point, your assumpti... - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.11.04 16:56:32
88. Fleet Formations - Can we have pls - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Memphis Baas wrote: oiukhp Muvila wrote: And that is why custom implementation of many things are rarely allowed. The childish behavior of many adults in this game. In all fairness, the aforementioned formation can be achieved right now, ... - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.11.02 03:12:50
89. Damage dampener device to counter focus fire - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Donnachadh wrote: Focusing fire onto a single or small group of targets is standard military practice and has been for centuries why should the game change to prevent this valid and valuable tactic? Actually you are wrong. Focus fire on ... - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.11.02 03:02:30
90. Pay to watch replay of a Killmail - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Radical Posture wrote: You can learn a lot from a killmail.. . And that is the problem with Killmails, way too much free information is provided. - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.11.01 01:55:06
91. Fleet Formations - Can we have pls - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Chewytowel Haklar wrote: Quick everyone! Penis formation! And that is why custom implementation of many things are rarely allowed. The childish behavior of many adults in this game. - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.11.01 01:40:44
92. Pay to watch replay of a Killmail - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Cameras recording a battle is one thing but Killmails themselves should be removed from the game. - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.11.01 01:37:52
93. Whatever happened to 1) generics, and 2) battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] I think this happens when a game designer listens too much to the player base. Some of the worst game design decisions were made by former players turned Dev or from Devs listening to player too much. Dominion Sov with invulnerable Starbases in C... - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.10.30 13:34:25
94. Unable to fly Comand Ships anymore - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Maybe file a bug report if you can't now fly what you could before? - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.10.27 11:22:45
95. NPC Mining Operations have now begun on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] CODE Customer Service wrote: All the factions have bought mining permits for all their industrialists. After intense negotiations, even the NPC's have decided to fly compliant. That being said, they can suck up as much of James 315's ore as the... - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.10.27 11:16:35
96. I screwed up my UI, how can I fix it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] The target anchor that appears next to a single locked target. Normally upper left corner of locked target. - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.10.27 11:07:41
97. I screwed up my UI, how can I fix it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Drag the target origin around until all five show again. Right click on target origin and select align vertical. - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.10.27 10:59:14
98. Remove immunity to cargo scanners from blockade runners - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Mark Marconi wrote: Seriously they should remove cargo scanners. Turn ganking into a gamble. Then it is actually a risk vs reward. rather than a small loss vs a huge gain. Too many gankers would complain because they have gotten used to ga... - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.10.27 10:56:19
99. Sticky:[Ascension] Command Ship skill requirement changes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread] Brown Pathfinder wrote: Fozzie can't you give CS 3 rig slots? And give extra mid +1 across the board? Why should a Command Ship be the only Tech II ships to have three rig slots? The whole point of limiting Tech II ships to two rig slots was... - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.10.27 05:50:57
100. The pointlessness of corps requesting full APIs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Sonya Corvinus wrote: oiukhp Muvila wrote: Ah yes, this famous reasoning. Just like a bunch of "security" individuals over the years. Go watch 1984, you should fit right in. You do realize this is a video game, right? Real life examples ... - by oiukhp Muvila - at 2016.09.20 23:05:31
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.