EVE Search - DevPostFinder

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Click here to find additional results using Google

Result 181-200 of 2336 for DPF - GMs (0,43 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
181. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] RubyPorto wrote: b) continue short list of Exceptions, like initiating a suicide gank, or whatever. Take these from the publicly viewable information used in your in house Newbie definition That right there is the problem. We can probably ... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.14 19:52:00
182. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Alright, instead of arguing this any further. Here one for you guys. I am sure that most of you understand our goals, now assuming you had ZERO development time, how would YOU word a policy that achieves these goals? - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.14 19:05:00
183. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] RubyPorto wrote: Since nothing of much economic value happens in rookie systems, the only thing this really applies to is something like "are Hulks in rookie systems 'rookies'?" Dear lord... Hulks are advanced T2 ships. I am not going to d... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.14 18:53:00
184. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] EI Digin wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: EI Digin wrote: There are many many situations where a "new player", either a legitimate new player or a veteran with an axe to grind and a trial account, can exploit the system resulting in others becom... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.14 18:52:00
185. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Haulie Berry wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: Ok, this seems to be getting out of hand and our rulings are pulled out of context. So let me state this in the most simple terms possible. 1. New PLAYERS are protected by CCP in the systems listed her... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.14 18:50:00
186. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Ok, this seems to be getting out of hand and our rulings are pulled out of context. So let me state this in the most simple terms possible. 1. New PLAYERS are protected by CCP in the systems listed here: http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Rookie_... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.14 18:36:00
187. Support Ticket Queue Status - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] EFF ONEF1 wrote: It would be beneficial to know how many new tickets are submitted as well. Looking at these numbers alone I'd say not much is going on. But perhaps the good gm only has current queue view access. On average current crea... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.14 15:50:00
188. Crimes for Unposted Policies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Terranid Meester wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: You got a CCP response. /me looks at my GM tag. Yep, CCP Sorry I meant to say a member of CCP who is not also a GM who can also speak on such matters. Someone from gameplay [if they are involve... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.13 13:07:00
189. Crimes for Unposted Policies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Terranid Meester wrote: Gatosai wrote: Terranid Meester wrote: Personally I feel some of the GM's are not up to the job and their discretion is poorly implementated. I also feel that rookies should not be protected and in-game mechanics s... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.13 13:01:00
190. Crimes for Unposted Policies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] DeBingJos wrote: Cutter Isaacson wrote: DeBingJos wrote: Remember, adding non-rookie systems like Hek and Arnon to the list opens up other griefing oppurtunities 1. Create new toon 2. Set course to Hek 3. Probe a mission runner 4. Steal ... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.13 12:40:00
191. Why can we go directly to a Dev post, but not a GM post? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] A sample search within a topic. - by GM Spiral - at 2012.06.13 12:38:00
192. Crimes for Unposted Policies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Adriel Malakai wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: Can flipping is specifically mentioned because it is impossible to target someone specific. If you can flip a veteran in a rookie system we will (most likely) not take action against you. But if a roo... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.13 11:45:00
193. Crimes for Unposted Policies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Tippia wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: Those are the same rules. There is no difference. You cannot mess with rookies. You can mess with anyone else no matter the system. veterans are NOT protected in rookie systems. Ok, but that's not what the r... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.13 11:39:00
194. Crimes for Unposted Policies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] gfldex wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: My post very clearly mentions rookies. As long as you don't define what a rookie is, you can mention them as often as you want, without making anything clear. Re-quote from another post: We are not go... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.13 11:39:00
195. Crimes for Unposted Policies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Stopgap measures such as these policies are in place until a proper update to the NPE can be made. Measures that are less disruptive to the sandbox environments are being looked into. Can baiting non-rookies in a rookie system? This is a m... - by GM Spiral - at 2012.06.13 11:36:00
196. Crimes for Unposted Policies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] DeBingJos wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: Tippia wrote: Cutter Isaacson wrote: I don't think it's so much that Hek or any of the other systems are going to be re-classed as rookie systems, but that the rules set up for rookie systems will al... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.13 11:35:00
197. Crimes for Unposted Policies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Adriel Malakai wrote: Adriel Malakai wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: We are always working on that. However, we are asking our community to act as a good community. We understand that it is a relatively small group that exhibits this behavior, ... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.13 11:30:00
198. Crimes for Unposted Policies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Tippia wrote: Cutter Isaacson wrote: I don't think it's so much that Hek or any of the other systems are going to be re-classed as rookie systems, but that the rules set up for rookie systems will also ensure the safety of rookies who are se... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.13 11:29:00
199. Crimes for Unposted Policies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Simi Kusoni wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: My post very clearly mentions rookies. We want everyone to let new players acclimate to the game before they are thrown in with the sharks. By all means, gank, steal from, scam and whatever else you wa... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.13 11:10:00
200. Crimes for Unposted Policies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] DeBingJos wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: Let me state this very clearly here. We do NOT want experienced players to mess with rookies barely a week in. We are sure that you have worthier targets than these players who are still learning the r... - by GM Homonoia - at 2012.06.13 11:02:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page
Click here to find additional results using Google

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.