| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
81. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Major Annoyance wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: This has been discussed and the GMs in question made a mistake. They were acting on out of date knowledge. Mistakes happen and GMs are not perfect. This is also the point where I have to remind peopl...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.26 13:23:00
|
82. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Major Annoyance wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: Customer support is making this post to clarify a specific type of case and our policies regarding that type of case. Recently we have seen a rise in reimbursement requests on the grounds of a conver...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.26 09:27:00
|
83. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tiberu Stundrif wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: As posted earlier in the thread, the claim that it produces significant lag is still under investigation. Right now it is not allowed because it is spam, just like repeatedly EVE mailing someone is s...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.26 09:20:00
|
84. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Prototype Epsilon wrote: Quote: As posted earlier in the thread, the claim that it produces significant lag is still under investigation. Right now it is not allowed because it is spam, just like repeatedly EVE mailing someone is spam and n...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 16:55:00
|
85. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tiberu Stundrif wrote: Wikipedia : "An exploit, in video games, is the use of a bug or glitches, rates, hit boxes, or speed, etc. by a player to their advantage in a manner not intended by the game's designers ." So, CCP didn't intend for pl...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 16:31:00
|
86. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Soko99 wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: Linking **** in chat channels is not allowed, but it is not an exploit. Basically, everything that breaches our rules (EULA, ToS, etc) is not allowed, but abusing the system in a way that drastically affect...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 16:30:00
|
87. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: For example, in fleet engagements we do not reimburse for any reason; we punish people abusing our systems, but we do not reimburse because there is no way to do so fairly. What exactly is your ju...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 16:13:00
|
88. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: It is not allowed because it is spam. However, no one should lose a ship specifically because of this. In a fleet fight you should simply have auto-reject enabled. Even if you have not, you wil...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 14:11:00
|
89. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: However, no one should lose a ship specifically because of this. In a fleet fight you should simply have auto-reject enabled. Have you investigated whether this actually works? I've heard that bec...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 13:44:00
|
90. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote: So even though it's something players shouldn't do, if I lose a ship because of it I wont be reimbursed? Do you mind if I just ask you to flesh out the logic behind that a bit? Not saying there isn't logic there, I j...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 13:00:00
|
91. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Chribba wrote: How will we know who initiated the "spam" though, should we petition ever pilot trying to open a convo a the time or how's the though proceedure? /c Just file a single petition stating where and when you were when it happened...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 11:47:00
|
92. Sticky:Conversation spam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Customer support is making this post to clarify a specific type of case and our policies regarding that type of case. Recently we have seen a rise in reimbursement requests on the grounds of a conversation spam exploit. Is this an exploit? No, i...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.25 11:20:00
|
93. Name changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Falcon wrote: Typically, the only way you can change your name is if it breaches the naming policy that is in place by being offensive or otherwise naughty or nasty. The best thing to do is file a petition under the "Character Names" sub...
- by GM Spiral - at 2012.10.23 10:40:00
|
94. Client patching using Exefile.exe no longer supported - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
It has come to our attention that some players are continuing to use Exefile.exe to start the game even though they are not experiencing problems with the launcher. Starting the game using this file is not recommended and can no longer be used to...
- by GM Arcade - at 2012.10.16 14:20:00
|
95. Getting Rid of the Undesirables (for good this time) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: BUT , if you try and game the system to trick rookies into attacking you first (by, for example, having your alt activate the kill right on you right when you happen to sit at the undock of a r...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.15 15:20:00
|
96. Getting Rid of the Undesirables (for good this time) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Destiny Corrupted wrote: Darth Gustav wrote: ISD Suvetar wrote: Destiny Corrupted wrote: Jonah Gravenstein wrote: That's just asking for a ban, you know rookie systems are like wildlife reserves, and rookies are a protected species,...
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.15 10:48:00
|
97. The socket was closed. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Most of the feedback we have received seems to indicate that BT have resolved the problem and connections are possible to maintain. If we receive any further reports of connection issues from BT customers we will contact our network admins and a...
- by GM Arcade - at 2012.10.14 14:55:00
|
98. why does login take up to two minutes nowadays? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Clear your cache.
- by GM Homonoia - at 2012.10.08 22:32:00
|
99. Can you combine the current Amazon Inferno deal with the Buddy Program? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
xander Humble wrote: Hi all, has anyone tried to combine this limited time offer: http://www.amazon.com/Eve-Online-Inferno-Game-Code/dp/B008K8DP60/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1348928258&sr=8-1&keywords=eve+online+inferno with the...
- by GM Stardust - at 2012.09.29 15:29:00
|
100. Avatar Resculpting - Plex? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Prior to to the new character creation tool we had the portrait swap service. There has been demand for a service to resume or replace the old portrait swap service. This new service is effectively its successor.
- by GM Spiral - at 2012.09.28 16:34:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |
| Click here to find additional results using Google |