| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Reply to Topic | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient Electus Matari
282
 |
Posted - 2012.05.01 19:32:00 -
[31] - Quote
From my point of view, it goes like this:
In the history of the league, several times some team came up with a clever tactic that others had not thought of. In many cases, they told about it to Gyra in secret, who then ruled that they can use the tactic since it is not against the current rules. When the tactic became generally known, however, she sometimes made a rule forbidding it, because everyone using it would break the league.
Whenever this happened, the people who did not benefit from the clever tactic felt that the other side had "broken the spirit of the league" and got really upset, being very nasty both to other teams who then were nasty back, and towards the league organizers.
This happened one time too many, and the organizer finally got enough of it.
Let me clarify that I have been on both sides of that over the course of my racing career. There was a time when I was the one using the clever trick and did not see what the **** the people flaming us where about. I got very indignant and attributed it only on them being upset that we won a lot. There was also a time when another team pulled a clever trick against mine, and I have to say I am not at all proud of how I behaved then, either.
In this latest I was neutral: I felt it was a clever trick and it was ok that the team inventing it got the benefit of going through all the trouble; I also felt that forbidding it when it became general knowledge was a good idea because it being in general use would have broken the league. I also have to say I get the organizer's decision to quit: the best racers are people who care about winning (no matter what we claim about sportsmanship and stuff), and they get really heated if they feel they have been "cheated". That sort of drama is usually not on anyone's list of Top 10 Favorite Things To Do On Their Freetime. |

Lyn Farel
Kitzless
265
 |
Posted - 2012.05.01 19:44:00 -
[32] - Quote
Excuse me to say so, Mr Rhiannon, but what you say does not make the smallest sense to me. According to you, it is ok for someone to use a new trick they elaborated by being clever, but it is not when it starts to get used by everyone ?
Also, there was nothing innovative at all in that specific tactic. I myself thought about it several times as soon as I was running my third race. It was just not possible to do it considering the time and the means involved for a single person, but that would have been definitly doable for a team with more generous numbers. It was pretty obvious that the track could be scouted before the races. It was not a matter of innovative tactics here, it was a matter of daring. |

Erik Finnegan
Polytechnique Gallenteenne
59
 |
Posted - 2012.05.02 05:16:00 -
[33] - Quote
Sounds like a racing concept that also....hm, favors such tactical trouble ? At least it is hard to referee.
Subwarp racing never saw such discussions. I enjoyed the concept : instructional video |

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient Electus Matari
282
 |
Posted - 2012.05.02 14:21:00 -
[34] - Quote
Lyn Farel wrote:Excuse me to say so, Mr Rhiannon, but what you say does not make the smallest sense to me. According to you, it is ok for someone to use a new trick they elaborated by being clever, but it is not when it starts to get used by everyone? If someone invents (or puts the attention to) implementing some specific new tactic, yes, I feel it is fair they benefit from it for a few races (because it was clever, or it was effort and they were co-ordinated enough), but if it is league-breaking in general use, I also feel it is fair enough to change the rules to exclude it later. I also think this fairness holds in cases where the people using the tactic notify the league organizer about it and confirm that it is allowed - the situation is different if they do it in secret also from the organizer.
I believe in this case it is confirmed that the organizer was aware of the tactic being used. The reason that lead to the end of the league was not at all, as you implied, that some people wanted to follow the spirit and some the letter of the rules. I believe the reason was the drama that followed, and people's (on both side of the debate) abysmal behavior against the organizer about the calls she made. As a reward for what she did for us, she got people throwing tantrums if she does not do it the way they want.
That you did not have the co-ordination to organize for the scouting, nor the daring to ask the organizer yourself if that is allowed, is your loss. It does not make you a better person or a fairer racer. Trying to imply that people who did were somehow less "in the spirit of the league" is exactly the kind of holier-than-thou drama that I believe broke the whole thing.
But as I said - been there, done that, myself too. (In the covert co-operation between teams incident, for those who remember that far back.) I wish I hadn't, but it's quite too late for that now. Setting up a league is a hell of a job. Getting the kind of crap for it that the organizer has been getting for years... well, you get the picture. Serves us right to have it cancelled, to be honest.
Else |

Lyn Farel
Kitzless
266
 |
Posted - 2012.05.02 17:57:00 -
[35] - Quote
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote: If someone invents (or puts the attention to) implementing some specific new tactic, yes, I feel it is fair they benefit from it for a few races (because it was clever, or it was effort and they were co-ordinated enough), but if it is league-breaking in general use, I also feel it is fair enough to change the rules to exclude it later. I also think this fairness holds in cases where the people using the tactic notify the league organizer about it and confirm that it is allowed - the situation is different if they do it in secret also from the organizer.
I believe in this case it is confirmed that the organizer was aware of the tactic being used. The reason that lead to the end of the league was not at all, as you implied, that some people wanted to follow the spirit and some the letter of the rules. I believe the reason was the drama that followed, and people's (on both side of the debate) abysmal behavior against the organizer about the calls she made. As a reward for what she did for us, she got people throwing tantrums if she does not do it the way they want.
That you did not have the co-ordination to organize for the scouting, nor the daring to ask the organizer yourself if that is allowed, is your loss. It does not make you a better person or a fairer racer. Trying to imply that people who did were somehow less "in the spirit of the league" is exactly the kind of holier-than-thou drama that I believe broke the whole thing.
But as I said - been there, done that, myself too. (In the covert co-operation between teams incident, for those who remember that far back.) I wish I hadn't, but it's quite too late for that now. Setting up a league is a hell of a job. Getting the kind of crap for it that the organizer has been getting for years... well, you get the picture. Serves us right to have it cancelled, to be honest.
Else
That logics still eludes me. I was well aware that the organizer did not forbid the use of that tactic, where it made its use perfectly legitimate. What I am saying is that how this choice to firstly allow it has been made is beyond me. As much as I have not been implicated in the ensuing drama that followed, I still think that this was a poor choice, and very bad form. Considering the incredible advantage it gave to the team using the tactic, and the impossibility for all but the very large teams to implement it at each race, it is still beyond me how it continued in secret. Also, this very tactic signed the obvious end of the purpose of anchoring waypoint containers elsewhere than on the warp-in point, except being a reward for people with the means to shortcut it. And a reward giving such an advantage is not a reward, it is a game breaker. So, according to you it might be better to forbid the use of a tactic only when it starts to break the league. Well, it broke it as soon as it was put in application here. It hsould have been forbidden since the day it was discovered.
You also seem to believe that I feel personnaly offended by all of this, which is totally silly. You will not find any records of me saying otherwise or taking part in the whole outrage, because there is none. I am merely saying that I find the whole reasoning absurd.
And I never implied that some people wanted to follow the spirit and some the letter of the rules. |

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient Electus Matari
282
 |
Posted - 2012.05.02 19:33:00 -
[36] - Quote
I am afraid I cannot explain my logic any better than I already did, so if you do not get if I guess we have to settle for simply disagreeing on the subject.
Note though that the team did not get any advantage that another team could not have gotten. You even yourself say that the thought occurred to you too. You could have very well done the same thing they did; you chose not to. Had you chosen otherwise, either you would have gotten the same advantage, or the organizer would have decided then to forbid it for everyone. As the end result, the other team would not have gained on you.
This is a situation very different from getting an advantage that you had no possibility to gain. |

Lyn Farel
Kitzless
266
 |
Posted - 2012.05.03 01:15:00 -
[37] - Quote
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:Note though that the team did not get any advantage that another team could not have gotten. You even yourself say that the thought occurred to you too. You could have very well done the same thing they did; you chose not to. Had you chosen otherwise, either you would have gotten the same advantage, or the organizer would have decided then to forbid it for everyone. As the end result, the other team would not have gained on you.
This is a situation very different from getting an advantage that you had no possibility to gain.
Wrong. Several teams were made up of one or two people only. It was physically impossible for such small teams to scout an entire region in the time between the setup of the track and the race itself. It was not even a matter of choosing for them.
I will try to put it again differently : considering that most of the pilots were strongly opposed to that kind of tactics - they considered for most that racing was about racing, and not scouting a track that was supposed to stay hidden in the first place (I am merely stating what they thought here) - it was very unwise for the organizer to allow the use of such tactics nevertheless with the knowledge of that situation. I would say this was not far from being suicidal, actually. And it apparently was.
The wisest choice would have been not to allow it. If the team that used that trick asked beforehand, it was to stick to the rules, so they would have accepted that decision. |

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient Electus Matari
283
 |
Posted - 2012.05.03 05:53:00 -
[38] - Quote
Lyn Farel wrote:Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:Note though that the team did not get any advantage that another team could not have gotten. You even yourself say that the thought occurred to you too. You could have very well done the same thing they did; you chose not to. Had you chosen otherwise, either you would have gotten the same advantage, or the organizer would have decided then to forbid it for everyone. As the end result, the other team would not have gained on you.
This is a situation very different from getting an advantage that you had no possibility to gain. Wrong. Several teams were made up of one or two people only. It was physically impossible for such small teams to scout an entire region in the time between the setup of the track and the race itself. It was not even a matter of choosing for them. I will try to put it again differently : considering that most of the pilots were strongly opposed to that kind of tactics - they considered for most that racing was about racing, and not scouting a track that was supposed to stay hidden in the first place (I am merely stating what they thought here) - it was very unwise for the organizer to allow the use of such tactics nevertheless with the knowledge of that situation. I would say this was not far from being suicidal, actually. And it apparently was. The wisest choice would have been not to allow it. If the team that used that trick asked beforehand, it was to stick to the rules, so they would have accepted that decision. 1) There is nothing in the league that forces small teams to remain small, instead of allying with each other. Again, being too small to effectively co-operate was your choice (and mine, but still, a choice). 2) Again, I do not think the league died to the call the organizer made. People were willing to continue racing after it, after all. It is not like there were a major pilot walk-out or anything. It died to the organizer quitting, in my understanding due to the drama they deserved for the hard work they put into the league. I think that was a shame - but that generally, judging from the drama I saw and still see, quite deserved. |

Graelyn
Knights of Kador Aegis Militia
235
 |
Posted - 2012.05.03 07:16:00 -
[39] - Quote
Anyhow, it sounds like the general tone in here is "We should have something nice, as long as someone else will do the hard work that it requires." + Cardinal Graelyn + Owner/Operator, "The Summit" YR113 Amarr Loyalist of the Year
|

N'maro Makari
The Synenose Accord Celestial Imperative
50
 |
Posted - 2012.05.03 07:45:00 -
[40] - Quote
Graelyn wrote:Anyhow, it sounds like the general tone in here is "We should have something nice, as long as someone else will do the hard work that it requires."
Lo and behold, the saga of the capsuleer. N'maro Makari Director of Public Relations The Synenose Accord Celestial Imperative |
|

Lyn Farel
Kitzless
269
 |
Posted - 2012.05.03 11:02:00 -
[41] - Quote
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote: 1) There is nothing in the league that forces small teams to remain small, instead of allying with each other. Again, being too small to effectively co-operate was your choice (and mine, but still, a choice). Co-operation has always been a part of the league - e.g. using team-mates as warp-in to cover for botches was pretty much essential. 2) Again, I do not think the league died to the call the organizer made. People were willing to continue racing after it, after all. It is not like there were a major pilot walk-out or anything. It died to the organizer quitting, in my understanding due to the drama and complaints of "totally destroying the spirit" being the reward they got for the hard work they put into the league. I think that was a shame - but generally, judging from the drama I saw and still see, quite deserved.
1) It was specifically the organizers and sponsors that wanted to see more teams emerging. If the goal was to see them being ingested by phagocytosis from bigger teams afterwards, well, it does not make a lot of sense. In any case, a lot of facts and doctrines in that league continuously hampered the formation of small teams or freelances.
2) People were willing to continue racing with different rules, and nobody seemed to agree with each other. Of course, I do not know a lot more than that... I mostly watched the various reactions.
Graelyn wrote:Anyhow, it sounds like the general tone in here is "We should have something nice, as long as someone else will do the hard work that it requires."
I find the concept of racing interesting and was ready to organize a new one. At least, a part of it. I am terrible at finding sponsors and all the trade arrangements that have to be made. I do not really care if I am part of a race or not.
But I guess nobody proved really interested, or maybe I was just terrible at motivating people. Or the last drama was maybe too recent for people to really get invested in something else.
I also thought of subwarp racing which solves a lot of issues, but seeing the explanatory videos shown above, I have to admit that I do not find it really interesting, extremely simplistic, and very hazardous. |

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient Electus Matari
284
 |
Posted - 2012.05.03 14:40:00 -
[42] - Quote
Lyn Farel wrote:I find the concept of racing interesting and was ready to organize a new one. At least, a part of it. I am terrible at finding sponsors and all the trade arrangements that have to be made. I do not really care if I am part of a race or not.
But I guess nobody proved really interested, or maybe I was just terrible at motivating people. If you are interested in doing it, just do it. When the league started originally, there were no fancy sponsors and prizes and trade arrangements and stuff. You do not need them. People do not race for the prizes; they race for the fun of it. All you need is to be willing to do the work. ISK you do not need.
(Edited to add: If the cost of the actual waypoint containers is prohibitive to you, I'll donate them.) |

Lyn Farel
Kitzless
269
 |
Posted - 2012.05.03 16:12:00 -
[43] - Quote
Setting up something with basically no enthusiasm or feedbacks is usually hardly worth it, especially when I asked Ms Gyra Rho last time if I could do anything to make it continue. But as I said this was back last year in another context.
If you tell me that it is really worth it, then I will start to think again about it.
NB : Containers prices are not an issue at all, and they can be re-used. |

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient Electus Matari
285
 |
Posted - 2012.05.03 16:14:00 -
[44] - Quote
Why do you need me to tell you if it is worth it?
Obviously Gyra did not think it was worth it for her, since she quit. Obviously I do not think it is worth it for me, or I'd be doing it myself.
What the hell does that have to do with whether it is worth it for you? |

Che Biko
Humanitarian Communists
79
 |
Posted - 2012.05.03 16:51:00 -
[45] - Quote
Woo, I wish I had not opened that can of worms, as it took the thread a bit off-topic, but thanks for the explanations regardless.
Lyn Farel wrote:I also thought of subwarp racing which solves a lot of issues, but seeing the explanatory videos shown above, I have to admit that I do not find it really interesting, extremely simplistic, and very hazardous. Each his/her opinion, but I suggest you try one first. Sure, the concept is luckily very simple, but trying to succesfully maneuver through a hairpin with as much speed as possible is quite a challenge. And I don't really see how it is very hazardous. One of the reasons I did not compete in the NERA was that I did not want to risk the lives of my crew, which seems more of a risk on the low-sec races of the NERA than the hi-sec races of the SRV.
Of course, those in military occupations will probably not find the races as exciting as your usual line of work, but for peaceful industrialists like me it is quite the adrenaline rush. |

Saikoyu
Rho Dynamics Tesseract Nexus
23
 |
Posted - 2012.05.03 18:14:00 -
[46] - Quote
I believe I have read enough of this.
For the record, I was one of the pilots that used the tactic Lyn and other have talked about. I was not happy when it was declared un-usable, and I probably contributed to the "drama" that ended the league. Not that it needed much help. At one point I did care about that, but I find that I do not any more.
Sory to steal a jump on you Lyn, and you Benilopax, but I will be re-starting the league. Gyra is free to contact me at any time is she does not wish me to use the NERA name, but I will be following the same general format, racing between waypoints placed in different low sec systems. If some covert ops pilots wish to join me, I might even film it.
Unfortunately, I will be planet bound on and off over the next several months, so the league will not be restarting soon. At the moment, I believe I will be ready to start in late July. Until then, I bid you fair well and stop diverting this thread. Please start another if you wish to discuss this further. I will be watching. Siakoyu Eblis-Kad Manager of Rho Dynamics Head of Capsuleer operations for New Life Project |

Norrin Ellis
Venture Racing
79
 |
Posted - 2012.05.03 19:54:00 -
[47] - Quote
Lyn Farel wrote: Wrong. Several teams were made up of one or two people only. It was physically impossible for such small teams to scout an entire region in the time between the setup of the track and the race itself. It was not even a matter of choosing for them.
On the three occasions that I scouted the track, the first time I had assistance from two pilots. The other two times, I did it entirely alone.
Furthermore, a rational person would conclude that the smaller teams or independent pilots have a greater incentive to put in the time required to offset their disadvantages against larger teams.
Your major premise is demonstrably false. CEO, Venture Racing Senior Banker, EVE Online Hold'Em |

Lyn Farel
Kitzless
269
 |
Posted - 2012.05.04 12:52:00 -
[48] - Quote
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:Why do you need me to tell you if it is worth it? It's a lot of work, but racers would appreciate. If you do something racers do not like - and eventually you will - you will get some drama. When races run smoothly, you get a lot of glory. How can I decide how you should weigh those against each other?
Obviously Gyra did not think it was worth it for her, since she quit. Obviously I do not think it is worth it for me, or I'd be doing it myself.
What the hell does that have to do with whether it is worth it for you? That's something you have to decide for yourself.
Sure thing. You have my thanks for your advices.
Che Biko wrote: Each his/her opinion, but I suggest you try one first. Sure, the concept is luckily very simple, but trying to succesfully maneuver through a hairpin with as much speed as possible is quite a challenge. And I don't really see how it is very hazardous. One of the reasons I did not compete in the NERA was that I did not want to risk the lives of my crew, which seems more of a risk on the low-sec races of the NERA than the hi-sec races of the SRV.
Of course, those in military occupations will probably not find the races as exciting as your usual line of work, but for peaceful industrialists like me it is quite the adrenaline rush.
A single video is definitly not exhaustive and if you have other materials to offer I would really like to see them. Maybe if I find the time to try it myself, I will, too. Do not hesitate to make me know when you have a track at your disposal, or whatever.
What I found hazardous was not the system in itself, but more how to know if a racer has passed every waypoint correctly, especially if they all race together. I believe it has to be quite intensive for all your judges/observers.
Saikoyu wrote: Sory to steal a jump on you Lyn, and you Benilopax, but I will be re-starting the league.
There is nothing to steal. The more different proposal racers have, the more they will pick what they think is best for their tastes and the least outrages.
Norrin Ellis wrote:
On the three occasions that I scouted the track, the first time I had assistance from two pilots. The other two times, I did it entirely alone.
Good for you. It may be physically possible for you, but not for me, at least. My apologies if I tend to forget that I tend to lack of stamina.
Norrin Ellis wrote:Furthermore, a rational person would conclude that the smaller teams or independent pilots have a greater incentive to put in the time required to offset their disadvantages against larger teams.
Your major premise is demonstrably false.
Fortunately, you do not sound like a rational person. |

Che Biko
Humanitarian Communists
79
 |
Posted - 2012.05.04 16:21:00 -
[49] - Quote
Lyn Farel wrote:A single video is definitly not exhaustive and if you have other materials to offer I would really like to see them. Maybe if I find the time to try it myself, I will, too. Do not hesitate to make me know when you have a track at your disposal, or whatever.
What I found hazardous was not the system in itself, but more how to know if a racer has passed every waypoint correctly, especially if they all race together. I believe it has to be quite intensive for all your judges/observers. Well, the channel the linked video is in should contain some races like this one. This one is mostly just between me and Kabel, as the other racers were rookies, so feel free to skip to the next round video after we are done . This track has a loop.
Well, it can be challenging for the judges, but even with 10+ participants in a race it is doable for the most part (with enough judges), and it may happen that you get a penalty for cutting when in fact you were not, but if you are that close, than it is just a risk you take. There was someone not agreeing with a decision sometimes, but nothing resulting in problematic drama. We never considered using stuff like replays if there was doubt.
I'll try to remember to fill you in if I find out there is a track somewhere.
Edit: P.S. Send me a mail as a reminder, to improve the chances of me remembering. |

Benilopax
The Ashen Lion Syndicate The Ashen Syndicate
267
 |
Posted - 2012.05.10 00:43:00 -
[50] - Quote
Just to update you all on the Racing League, I have secured EVETV coverage for the event. It will not be a live broadcast as discussed before but footage will be put together to be played during the finals of the alliance tournament.
I have decided that sub-warp racing will be my preferred format as it's much easier to cover visually.
However I read that others now wish to start a racing league, with different formats, I would strongly urge that we try to work together to build a stronger racing league that can supply all tastes. |
|

Benilopax
The Ashen Lion Syndicate The Ashen Syndicate
267
 |
Posted - 2012.05.10 00:47:00 -
[51] - Quote
Niraia wrote:Hi Benilopax, Lyn Farel wrote:I find it interesting. I however still have doubts on what will be done to prevent the unfortunate last events that basically lead the NERA to its end ? Unless this can be adequately addressed, there's no reason to proceed. I'm also not sure why a self-proclaimed "fat and rich" mogul should be seeking donations at this early stage. However, if you can work it out, it'd be nice to talk sometime. I'd personally enjoy watching the races, too.
I'm planning to sink a lot of my isk into this endeavour but I'm always willing to add money to the prize fund from other sources so that we can have several prizes for ship classes team awards etc etc |

Benilopax
The Ashen Lion Syndicate The Ashen Syndicate
267
 |
Posted - 2012.05.10 00:51:00 -
[52] - Quote
Saikoyu wrote:I believe I have read enough of this.
For the record, I was one of the pilots that used the tactic Lyn and other have talked about. I was not happy when it was declared un-usable, and I probably contributed to the "drama" that ended the league. Not that it needed much help. At one point I did care about that, but I find that I do not any more.
Sory to steal a jump on you Lyn, and you Benilopax, but I will be re-starting the league. Gyra is free to contact me at any time is she does not wish me to use the NERA name, but I will be following the same general format, racing between waypoints placed in different low sec systems. If some covert ops pilots wish to join me, I might even film it.
Unfortunately, I will be planet bound on and off over the next several months, so the league will not be restarting soon. At the moment, I believe I will be ready to start in late July. Until then, I bid you fair well and stop diverting this thread. Please start another if you wish to discuss this further. I will be watching.
Well seeing as organisation for my sub warp race event has already begun (see above) and you plan to start warp races at around the same time, can we not work together to create a broad spectrum of racing events under the same banner?
You know, because it would be fun? |

Astrid Stjerna
Underking Family
667
 |
Posted - 2012.05.10 01:06:00 -
[53] - Quote
Benilopax wrote:Greetings fellow speed enthusiasts!
As you may know there was once a series of races held across the galaxy that brought in billions of isk in prize money. Sadly the races stopped and there was an abortive attempt to re-ignite the concept of pitting pilots against each other on the track rather than in the arena.
I personally held a few race meetings independently of the regular season which were popular events. I have since become fat and rich and like any good mogul I wish to sink my hard earned isk into prize money to attempt to relaunch the racing season once more.
My proposal is as follows, if I can secure the support of racing teams, pilots, sponsors, and stewards I will hold a racing meet during the Alliance tournament with an initial prize fund of 5 Billion isk, not as a season grand prize but just for the race itself, I want to make the fatest pilots rich men and I would like donations to be made to the prize fund to be held by a trustworthy third party (Chribba) so that we can get a prize fund in excess of 10 billion.
I would like commentary, I would like EVE radio coverage, I would like EVETV coverage, but I can only do this if there are racers, staff and of course fans willing to bet on the outcome so that we can sell this event as one worthy of merit.
I will gladly accept help and support and pledges to get this sport back onto the space-lanes!
What say you New Eden?
Benilopax
If you need someone to commentate, I can connect you with a few people.
((OOC: I can provide editing services if you have video available, including commentary and stuff.))
I can't get rid of my darn signature!-a Oh, wait.... |

Benilopax
The Ashen Lion Syndicate The Ashen Syndicate
269
 |
Posted - 2012.05.10 01:09:00 -
[54] - Quote
Astrid Stjerna wrote:Benilopax wrote:Greetings fellow speed enthusiasts!
As you may know there was once a series of races held across the galaxy that brought in billions of isk in prize money. Sadly the races stopped and there was an abortive attempt to re-ignite the concept of pitting pilots against each other on the track rather than in the arena.
I personally held a few race meetings independently of the regular season which were popular events. I have since become fat and rich and like any good mogul I wish to sink my hard earned isk into prize money to attempt to relaunch the racing season once more.
My proposal is as follows, if I can secure the support of racing teams, pilots, sponsors, and stewards I will hold a racing meet during the Alliance tournament with an initial prize fund of 5 Billion isk, not as a season grand prize but just for the race itself, I want to make the fatest pilots rich men and I would like donations to be made to the prize fund to be held by a trustworthy third party (Chribba) so that we can get a prize fund in excess of 10 billion.
I would like commentary, I would like EVE radio coverage, I would like EVETV coverage, but I can only do this if there are racers, staff and of course fans willing to bet on the outcome so that we can sell this event as one worthy of merit.
I will gladly accept help and support and pledges to get this sport back onto the space-lanes!
What say you New Eden?
Benilopax If you need someone to commentate, I can connect you with a few people. ((OOC: I can provide editing services if you have video available, including commentary and stuff.))
That's the most positive response so far! Thank you! |

Che Biko
Humanitarian Communists
80
 |
Posted - 2012.05.10 01:22:00 -
[55] - Quote
This is awesome! In fact, it's so awesome I almost can't believe it. You better be not be pranking us, Benilopax! Darn, now I will have to check my implants, get back in my pod and try to reassemble the team. Haha, who am I kidding, I'll do it gladly for this.
giddygiddy wooohooo! |

Silas Vitalia
Nobilta Nera
254
 |
Posted - 2012.05.10 02:03:00 -
[56] - Quote
Benilopax,
Change the format to sub warp, set up interesting tracks, hire the right live-commentators, and you will have success on your hands.
Sub warp format will in fact translate quite well to the "Eve-TV" audience.
|

Che Biko
Humanitarian Communists
81
 |
Posted - 2012.05.11 03:35:00 -
[57] - Quote
For those interested I link the thread concerning the actual planned event here: racing event thread |

Benilopax
The Ashen Lion Syndicate The Ashen Syndicate
277
 |
Posted - 2012.05.14 11:45:00 -
[58] - Quote
Have created a channel and mailing list called "New Eden Racing" please join for more information and discussions. |

Jill Xelitras
Xeltec services
37
 |
Posted - 2012.05.18 21:37:00 -
[59] - Quote
Lyn Farel wrote: Do not hesitate to make me know when you have a track at your disposal, or whatever.
Caldari state has kindly authorized Xeltec services to build a track in Ikao. The current license is valid for another 25 days.
Send me a mail for Instructions on how to get to the track.
Jill Xelitras
EVE Racing event thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=107164&find=unread
Join in game channel/mailing list: New Eden Racing |
|
|
| |
Reply to Topic |
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |