|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |
Dakeen Kurvora
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 18:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Dakeen Kurvora wrote:I'm still not understanding any kind of issue with the simple rule of don't mess with rookies?
You scan down a potential gank victim in high sec, check him out and he is a under a month old. Move on!
You find a procurer mining in high sec belt while your out ganking miners, check him. Under a month? Move on! You find a Badger I carrying 25 billion in technetium coming out of gate cloak on a the EC-P8R gate in Torrinos, check him. Under a month. Move onGǪ?
Unfortunately you seemed to have missed the part about using your brain. Obviously that is no rookie sir. Fire away. Like I said if your brain fails you then take the slap on the wrist. It's --extremely-- unlikely that a GM will do anything in that situation. |
Dakeen Kurvora
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 18:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
I just remember a GM saying "Don't mess with rookies" nothing specific about systems. Although I was aware of the "Rookie System" rule as well. So what
If it is only in "Rookie Systems" why worry about who is a rookie or not in those specific systems? Almost all situations can be resolved outside said systems. One jump out. The guy carrying 25b worth of stuff isn't just orbiting the station is he? He is either going somewhere or came from somewhere right? So follow him out. If he is headed to the station there than well that in unfortunately a lost opportunity. Question is, was I their waiting at a gate for someone to come along inside that Rookie System? My fault for not being on the other side of the gate.
If it extends into other systems, again think first guys. Generally if you have to it would be a bad idea. |
Dakeen Kurvora
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 18:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ginseng Jita wrote:GM Homonoia wrote:Ginseng Jita wrote:CCP needs to be upfront and define what a *rookie* is. Simple. No, see my post above. We can define it, but you, as a player, have no way of verifying if another player fits the criteria. Oh, so you are saying we players are stupid. Thanks for the vote of confidence.
Pretty sure he means we can't see what they see. |
|
|
|