Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
ollobrains2
Gallente New Eve Order Holdings
|
Posted - 2009.03.15 12:19:00 -
[1]
Now its in what is ccp thinking next t3 frigs-destroyers t3 ammo or is it going to t3 battlecruisers ?
|
Kobushi
OCForums
|
Posted - 2009.03.15 18:48:00 -
[2]
probably ccp is busy with T3 Apocrypha streamlining and debugging
|
ollobrains2
Gallente New Eve Order Holdings
|
Posted - 2009.03.15 22:09:00 -
[3]
yeah probably a month of fixing bugs tweaking etc, its more in the medium term for the next expansion im thinking whats the plan no doubt they would have teams working on it
|
CrestoftheStars
Caldari Recreation Of The World
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 12:20:00 -
[4]
what about some useful T2 bs's first ?! the marauders are a joke and useless for what they where designed for comparing the golem to the cnr or the paladin with the nightmare, it just makes a pro mission runner sad :.( ___________________________________________ Whoever appeals to the law against his fellow man is either a fool or a coward. Whoever cannot take care of himself without that law is both. For a wounded |
ollobrains2
Gallente New Eve Order Holdings
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 12:33:00 -
[5]
how about t3 subsystems ( optional) for t2 ships. Could be an intermediate step for full t3 battleships ( thoughts ?) or perhasp one t3 subsystem could be applied to t2 battleships. Instead of the full 5
|
Nnamuachs
Caldari Kiith Paktu Veneratio Venator Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 13:30:00 -
[6]
lets go the other way... tech 3 destroyers should be next.
|
DarkAstoria
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 13:59:00 -
[7]
T3 Frigates/dessies. Plz. Thanks. Then battleships. Cruisers seemed like a logical first step, imo the bread and butter class of ships. Frigates are the best next step for a few reasons: 1. CCP is clearly trying to expand its player base. Highly customizable ships that are not too too hard to train up for lends itself better to this aim. Maybe following the S.Cruisers' direction, prerequisites could be 2. Easier to balance. The bigger the ship, the more slots/subs/rigs that can be used to max for different functionality. Think t3 frigate, set up to be killer glass cannon v. t2 battleship a OmgWtfGlass DeathRay.
|
DarkAstoria
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 14:01:00 -
[8]
ugg. Hit Post before I meant to.... prerequisites could be something like Engineering 4, mechanic 4, gunnery/missile launcher 4 etc.
|
taekwandokid
hirr Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 14:26:00 -
[9]
t2 carrier's first
|
Reborn Dragon
Gallente Federal Defence Union
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 14:47:00 -
[10]
Originally by: taekwandokid t2 carrier's first
They are called Motherships.
|
|
taekwandokid
hirr Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 15:14:00 -
[11]
Edited by: taekwandokid on 16/03/2009 15:15:18
Originally by: Reborn Dragon
They are called Motherships.
motherships are t1... 3 rig slots, different hull.
/me slaps reborn dragon upside the head. Please resize your signature to the maximum allowed of 400 x 120 pixels with a maximum file size of 24000 bytes. Navigator |
Bobbeh
Minmatar Navy of Xoc Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 17:08:00 -
[12]
Faction Caps!!!! Then T3 Dessies and Frigs.... Then fix the t2 bs's so they show the same efficiency increase over t1 as the other classes of ships from t1 to t2
|
Winters Chill
Amarr Ministry of War
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 17:33:00 -
[13]
I'd personally like to see cruisers being the smallest tech 3 class with tech 3 battleships and a new capital class.
|
Uzume Ame
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 19:48:00 -
[14]
what about finishing current content? fix t3 subsystems and makje t3 really usefull for their price, stop asking for new content that's what started all the trouble with all the unfinished game mechanics.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |