Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Hellaciouss
Genco Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 14:53:00 -
[1]
This has been brought up before, and now with sleepers I think it needs to be brought up again. Can we please get a battleship sized logistic ship.
|
Tarron Sarek
Gallente Biotronics Inc. Alternative Realities
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 15:00:00 -
[2]
I think you misunderstood the concept behind sleepers. It's not about one ship doing it all, it's about distributed effort and teamwork. That battleship sized logistic ship would just be the sleepers' primary, or taken out by sleeper EW. Therefore I think sleepers are not a very good argument for the implementation of BS sized logistics. Apart from spider tanking already being too common and not needing a further boost.
___________________________________
Balance is power, guard hide it well
"Ceterum censeo Polycarbonem esse delendam" |
Reatu Krentor
Minmatar Void Spiders Fate Weavers
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 15:02:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Reatu Krentor on 16/03/2009 15:02:38
Originally by: Hellaciouss This has been brought up before, and now with sleepers I think it needs to be brought up again. Can we please get a battleship sized logistic ship.
What advantage would they have over the current logistics which are already able to use large logistic modules(while being really hard to shoot due to signature).
Now... if they would have a unique functionality, say like a triage module(but way cheaper)... hmm
*edit* Originally by: Tarron Sarek I think you misunderstood the concept behind sleepers. It's not about one ship doing it all, it's about distributed effort and teamwork. That battleship sized logistic ship would just be the sleepers' primary, or taken out by sleeper EW. Therefore I think sleepers are not a very good argument for the implementation of BS sized logistics. Apart from spider tanking already being too common and not needing a further boost.
what he says -- stuff -- |
Hellaciouss
Genco Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 15:15:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Tarron Sarek I think you misunderstood the concept behind sleepers. It's not about one ship doing it all, it's about distributed effort and teamwork. That battleship sized logistic ship would just be the sleepers' primary, or taken out by sleeper EW. Therefore I think sleepers are not a very good argument for the implementation of BS sized logistics. Apart from spider tanking already being too common and not needing a further boost.
I don't misunderstand anything. The ship is ment to support a gang and would be helpless on it's own. It is a ship designed specificly for teamwork. Want a difference in bonuses? Give it only 10% increase in range and 20% increase in repair amount per level, that way the cruiser hull still has a role as a long distance repairer (repping friendly tacklers) and would still be seen far more often then the battleship hull, as the battleship hull would be a couple hundred million. Want a weakness? Give it a low sensor strength.
RR gangs aren't hard to break if you are setup correctly, and once one goes down, the rest soon follow.
|
Allahs Warrior
Gallente I.M.M
|
Posted - 2009.03.16 16:58:00 -
[5]
Boost to spider tank isn't exactly necessary, and logistics ships repair so much already. A group of 4 logistics ships can keep the average large POS from killing BS's before they warp out already, RR BS would be too much nerf.
We need more gank, not more tank.
BUt if it were to be implemented, I agree, short range, high repair amount, VERY slow, NO dronebay or anything, and mini-triage module.
Maybe give marauders mini-siege modules?
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |