Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 70 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Lord H3lmet
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:41:00 -
[361]
|
Mo adib
Titan Industries Technology Team
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:42:00 -
[362]
|
Tamir Lenk
Igneus Auctorita GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:42:00 -
[363]
Why would CCP give preferential treatment over something this foolish? Do the developers and moderators ignore the rest of the TOS?
This travesty must be addressed.
|
Englebert Humpher
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:42:00 -
[364]
Smile all the time.
|
Ed Silepec
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:42:00 -
[365]
One game, one rule. |
The Qat
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:43:00 -
[366]
|
Guillame Herschel
Buffalo Soldiers
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:43:00 -
[367]
Are you guys from Wall Street or something? How out of touch can you get? Ever heard of 'appearance of impropriety?' I'm theorizing that such concept does not exist in Icelandic culture.
Just rename this game to Bob's Playground and get it over with.
-- The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then --
|
Flesh Wombat
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:43:00 -
[368]
Shine you teeth 'til meaningless.
|
Aborterator
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:43:00 -
[369]
|
Althair Erin
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:43:00 -
[370]
The same rules must apply to all players -------------- On Hope On Kindness |
|
Recon Three
181st Legion W A S T E L A N D
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:44:00 -
[371]
Edited by: Recon Three on 23/03/2009 23:44:07 inb4 CCP comes in and bans everyone who supported this and then renames EVE Online to BOB Online where you have to have a history of MMO exploitation to register an account.
Edit: In after the CCP/BOB man orgy. _____
CCP, your nepotism is showing. |
Han Shuu
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:44:00 -
[372]
One game one rule
|
Lech Kaczynski
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:45:00 -
[373]
|
Keef Bochs
Ore Diggers
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:45:00 -
[374]
Originally by: Ed Silepec One game, one rule.
|
Karezan
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:45:00 -
[375]
While I can understand the concern with CCP potentially showing favoritism towards BoB (especially given past incidents here), I do think the whole alliance disbanding thing was somewhat of a mitigating factor. Still, if it's a serious issue to some people, I could see a demand for action (although right now it seems to be primarily BoB's enemies and alts posting).
What I don't understand is the demand to disband BoB. Even the original post quite clearly states that this would be a case of developer misconduct, and the solution to this is to...take it out on players? How does that deal with developer misconduct? If you were calling out the person who approved this, and whether that was an unbiased decision, sure, but asking for BoB 2.0 to be disbanded is just silly, and to me screams of ulterior motives.
If you lose a ship due to a known and confirmed in game bug, and petition it, should the GM simply destroy all ships you own if he feels this wasn't a bug after all?
This basically screams like another forum attention stunt by the Goons & co.
|
Antolin Vakalas
Ultrapolite Socialites GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:47:00 -
[376]
Interesting how these things tend to break in favor of one group.
|
Ed Silepec
Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:48:00 -
[377]
Originally by: Karezan What I don't understand is the demand to disband BoB. Even the original post quite clearly states that this would be a case of developer misconduct, and the solution to this is to...take it out on players? How does that deal with developer misconduct? If you were calling out the person who approved this, and whether that was an unbiased decision, sure, but asking for BoB 2.0 to be disbanded is just silly, and to me screams of ulterior motives.
Alliances cannot be renamed. If an alliance wants to change its name, it must first disband (potentially losing all its sov) then reform under the new name - if it doesn't want to risk it, then the old name stands.
This is the way it's always been, and the rules have been blatantly ignored in Kenzoku's favor. What's so hard to understand?
|
WingT
Moon Mechanics Corp
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:48:00 -
[378]
|
Aqua II
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:48:00 -
[379]
|
Phane Rielle
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:48:00 -
[380]
It's pretty bad that we even need threads like this. |
|
Vincent Death
K Directorate
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:48:00 -
[381]
Change the name back. They can be called whatever they want imho but they should do it in exactly the same way that the rest of us have to.
The proper name for a social system based on political freedom is capitalism. |
Karonas
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:48:00 -
[382]
|
Vasili Z
Foundation Sons of Tangra
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:48:00 -
[383]
waaaah, no -------
Eve requires no skill anymore |
Khandara Seraphim
StarHunt Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:49:00 -
[384]
Originally by: Karezan While I can understand the concern with CCP potentially showing favoritism towards BoB (especially given past incidents here), I do think the whole alliance disbanding thing was somewhat of a mitigating factor. Still, if it's a serious issue to some people, I could see a demand for action (although right now it seems to be primarily BoB's enemies and alts posting).
What I don't understand is the demand to disband BoB. Even the original post quite clearly states that this would be a case of developer misconduct, and the solution to this is to...take it out on players? How does that deal with developer misconduct? If you were calling out the person who approved this, and whether that was an unbiased decision, sure, but asking for BoB 2.0 to be disbanded is just silly, and to me screams of ulterior motives.
If you lose a ship due to a known and confirmed in game bug, and petition it, should the GM simply destroy all ships you own if he feels this wasn't a bug after all?
This basically screams like another forum attention stunt by the Goons & co.
The point isnt to delete the alliance to be punitive, but rather that Kenzoku would have had to disband itself and pay the fees / lose sov to reform. Disbanding bob reloaded merely mitigates the damage done.
Sure, it isn't a big deal but its fair ___________
Originally by: CCP Whisper Boo hoo. Cry some more. |
Taedron
Merch Industrial GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:50:00 -
[385]
|
Itzena
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:51:00 -
[386]
So what's up with Beaver Bros. anyway?
|
boot q
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:53:00 -
[387]
|
Smokey Chillarius
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:54:00 -
[388]
|
Cazzah
Eve University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:54:00 -
[389]
Originally by: Ed Silepec One game, one rule.
Nuff said ______ Cazzah, Recruiting Manager Eve University |
RoboTronic
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 23:55:00 -
[390]
+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?+?
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 70 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |