Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 70 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Salastil
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:40:00 -
[91]
Originally by: Buxaroo Edited by: Buxaroo on 23/03/2009 21:34:19 I already made a bet that someone would make a post like this. Thanks for making me 100 mil isk.
And if it wasn't for a POOR game mechanic, you know, disbanding an alliance in a SECOND when you can't even LEAVE a corp in 24 hours, then there wouldn't be a NEED to a renaming.
There is a mechanic preventing this, your leaders decided talking on a microphone made you trustworthy so they removed this in favor of instantly unlocking or locking of BPO or other corporate tasks. One such task is kicking corporations and stealing the wallet. Don't expect your debit card to not be used when the pin is written on the front of it when it's stolen.
|
Supposing CEO
DarkSide Defenders
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:40:00 -
[92]
WTB Internal Affairs.
|
Nichola Kreed
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:40:00 -
[93]
Originally by: Pesadel0 Why so serioooooouuuuusssss?
why cheat
|
Ivan Shenovich
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:40:00 -
[94]
No tinfoil hats here, but if a unit or individual within CCP has decided to start ignoring otherwise-universal policy (again) it needs to be ended early. Thanks! |
Shikome Alluin
Genco Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:40:00 -
[95]
- Aloha mr Hand |
Haid Arcan
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:41:00 -
[96]
|
moneygrabbingwhore
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:41:00 -
[97]
why havnt we seen any posts or replys from ccp yet, they must be bricking it
|
WhiteTigersGod
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:41:00 -
[98]
Disband them now.
|
Bozinius
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:42:00 -
[99]
Tired of favoritism in this game.
|
Zaribeth
Gladiators of Rage Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:42:00 -
[100]
|
|
furry vespa
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:42:00 -
[101]
This does not seem right !
|
Caldari Citizen4714
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:42:00 -
[102]
Originally by: rValdez5987 I disagree. If they want their name, let them have it. You still have their space so why complain over a NAME.
It's not the name. It's the blatant favoritism.
TWO of CCP's rules were broken with this act and by themselves.
Violations:- CCP does not do name changes upon player request.
- CCP does not allow naming your player, corporation, or alliance something that parodies an existing player, corporation or alliance. Band of Brothers Reloaded is a painfully obvious parody of Band of Brothers the corporation that existed PRIOR to "Band of Brothers Reloaded". And yes, I'm well aware that this corporation was created by Goonswarm specifically to block the original Band of Brothers members from reclaiming their name. But not one single aspect of this was done using exploits or any other even prohibited means.
There's no explaination for it other than favoritism. The name KenZoku was not a violation of the ToS. Thus it was not eligible for a GM name change.
|
Lady Shortcloak
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:43:00 -
[103]
I fully endorse this proposal
|
Buxaroo
Reikoku Band of Brothers Reloaded
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:43:00 -
[104]
Originally by: Hauling Theo ONe stone to rule em all, but one rule to stone em all.
THIS is messed up.
Yeah, but a flawed GAME MECHANIC that will only have ONE victim, BoB, isn't messed up?
Please explain why it takes 24 hours to leave a corp, takes 24 hours to JOIN an alliance, takes even 10 hours to DESTROY a character....but it takes only a millisecond to insta pop a whole alliance? Please, explain in a legitimate way without bias how this is isn't messed up?
I am all ears.
|
Gramonda
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:43:00 -
[105]
Why does this not surprise me anymore ?
|
Vosace
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:43:00 -
[106]
|
isqander
GoonFleet
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:44:00 -
[107]
Or just change the name to Band of Developers... Or just officially bring Tanis Alliance into the GBC. Either. Whatever.
|
Tobruk
Black Omega Security Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:44:00 -
[108]
Originally by: Buxaroo Edited by: Buxaroo on 23/03/2009 21:34:19 I already made a bet that someone would make a post like this. Thanks for making me 100 mil isk.
And if it wasn't for a POOR game mechanic, you know, disbanding an alliance in a SECOND when you can't even LEAVE a corp in 24 hours, then there wouldn't be a NEED to a renaming.
And if it wasn't for a POOR game mechanic, you know, disbanding an alliance in a SECOND when you can't even LEAVE a corp in 24 hours, then there wouldn't be a NEED to a renaming.
This is the **** that makes everyone so angry. While goonsawrm used a valid IN GAME mechanic to remove your alliance (broken or not) YOU GOT WHAT NO ONE ELSE HAS EVER GOTTEN. Two wrongs never make a right and certainly - petition to change the sov mechanic - BUT YOU DON'T DESERVE SPECIAL TREATMENT.
Its not about whats fair - this isnt hello kitty online - its about he rules, and making you play by them.
----------------------------------------------
Sig removed. Elmo Pug removed my sig because he hates me
|
Moore Ballard
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:44:00 -
[109]
Same rules should apply to everyone.
|
Bebes Yasdnil
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:45:00 -
[110]
|
|
Lochmar Fiendhiem
Quicksilver Industries and Painful Effects Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:45:00 -
[111]
Supporting this idea 100% They can rename all they want but they still have to follow the same rules. Either set them back to kenzoku or drop sov and do it right.
Originally by: Halkin bob is dead, goons are great, cheese is cheesy, there we go no need for any more threads
|
gnshadowninja
Baptism oF Fire Sons of Tangra
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:46:00 -
[112]
I support this, currently have 4 Petitions over 4 characters on this because this is the worse thing ive seen on a MMORPG ever.
|
Everyone Else
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:46:00 -
[113]
Anyone know if this change will affect sov timers in already contested systems? will they reset etc in a vague attempt to give kenny an advantage in some way as before? |
Justinor
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:46:00 -
[114]
|
Rafus
GoonFleet
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:46:00 -
[115]
|
Nichola Kreed
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:47:00 -
[116]
Originally by: Merin Ryskin Un-signed. The BoB name was only lost because of CCP's poor game design (it's ****ing stupid that a single person could ever do that, especially someone who isn't even the leader of the alliance), so they have every right to make up for their mistakes to some degree and restore the alliance name.
EVE have tons of poor game design(scam contracts etc,) why all idiots seats there and cry but only BOB get restore? yeah it can change alliance name but it must pay bill and loss sov!
|
Dahlia Houghton
DarkStar 1 GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:47:00 -
[117]
Originally by: Buxaroo
Originally by: Hauling Theo ONe stone to rule em all, but one rule to stone em all.
THIS is messed up.
Yeah, but a flawed GAME MECHANIC that will only have ONE victim, BoB, isn't messed up?
Please explain why it takes 24 hours to leave a corp, takes 24 hours to JOIN an alliance, takes even 10 hours to DESTROY a character....but it takes only a millisecond to insta pop a whole alliance? Please, explain in a legitimate way without bias how this is isn't messed up?
I am all ears.
Explain why he was left with the roles after being absent for so long?
I am all ears.
|
Ecid Q'Wulf
Blue Labs
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:47:00 -
[118]
Special consideration for a special alliance, makes me sick. ________
One like many, exactly like everyone else. |
Sin'Jin
DarkStar 1
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:47:00 -
[119]
One rule for all.
|
Sara Sahara
|
Posted - 2009.03.23 21:48:00 -
[120]
yea how does this affect pos/sov timers and such?
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 70 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |