Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Blobber NL
The Ultima Thule
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 21:55:00 -
[31] - Quote
Perhaps the OP should leave his wiskey/wodka/beer before he post. |
D3F4ULT
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 22:02:00 -
[32] - Quote
Fredfredbug4 wrote:What would stop players from abusing their power?
What if alts of the criminals exist in the police force?
How could security be maintained if these players are killable?
Wouldn't criminals be able to have an easier time evading limited humans rather than invincible bots?
Any player controlled police force would just result in the accidental creation of another lowsec.
Omg, sounds like real life. We should do something. REVOLT AGAINST THE FEDERATION! Creator of CCP ZULU - Incarna : Pants Online ( http://youtu.be/AObrlCf3Dcs ) |
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
122
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 22:13:00 -
[33] - Quote
Samillian wrote:Would any of you in this thread trust a group of EvE player to police you without fear of favour, bribery, corruption and personal advantage being taken?
Yes?
In that case I've got a really good deal on a Titan, transfer me 45 billion asap and this iWin mobile will be yours as soon as I see the cash hit my account. Some would do it for the RP element, others simply because it would mean the role of white knight characters would feel like it was actually supported. Some would do it for the rewards if they were sufficient. Many would probably do exactly what you mention and take bribes to do nothing, but, unless they are all on the payroll, someone else would just do it instead. |
Fannie Maes
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
39
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 22:26:00 -
[34] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtTRYnsDH8Q |
Krios Ahzek
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
809
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 22:35:00 -
[35] - Quote
Zane Kaiser wrote:Get rid of all the NPC Concord forces and replace them with players. Players who join the CONCORD force get a certain rank and are rewarded either ISK or loyalty points based on how many criminals they apprehend.
There will be little problem with abuse since you still can only shoot flagged players, and this will give gankers a fighting chance.
Replace the concept of criminal with the concept of enemy and you have just described Nullsec.
-áThough All Men Do Despise Us |
loki energon
Voodoo Children Workers Trade Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 04:17:00 -
[36] - Quote
perhaps a new class of character....sheriff. militiaman, maybe even expand upon the bounty hunter role. player run "deputies" . taking CONCORD out of the picture is a bad idea. giving US the ability to clean up our own trash, is one of the best new idea ive seen from the troll pool. no offence OP, i LOVE the basic idea you propose.
kill 'em all
loki kill em all. |
Super Chair
Project Cerberus Caldari State Capturing
239
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 05:25:00 -
[37] - Quote
In before police brutality
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qdxh-KaSBSg
|
Kievan Arakyd
MarSec Industries STR8NGE BREW
27
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 06:55:00 -
[38] - Quote
Or get rid of concord altogether and have empire navies deal with criminals in their systems. They have sovereignty there afterall. |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3594
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 06:58:00 -
[39] - Quote
Zane Kaiser wrote:Get rid of all the NPC Concord forces and replace them with players. Players who join the CONCORD force get a certain rank and are rewarded either ISK or loyalty points based on how many criminals they apprehend.
There will be little problem with abuse since you still can only shoot flagged players, and this will give gankers a fighting chance.
I am sure the noble and meticulously altruistic EVE playerbase would in no way abuse such a facility. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 07:01:00 -
[40] - Quote
You're right! Let's make CONCORD all humans. That way we have plenty of time to get away from ganking people, heck even escape them because E-Uni Idiot A is eating his donuts and cannot be interrupted. |
|
Arkady Vachon
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
55
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 07:02:00 -
[41] - Quote
Ganking? What ganking? All I see are your fine manners, citizen.
*smiles at increased wallet* Nothing Personal - Just Business...
Chaos Creates Content |
AngelFood
No C0de
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 07:23:00 -
[42] - Quote
You would all be destroyed! And rightly so. |
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
1507
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 08:21:00 -
[43] - Quote
This is, although a nice idea, not practical simply because most people don't care.
And, tbh, are easily avoidable. I can tell. :) Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |
Krios Ahzek
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
856
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 13:32:00 -
[44] - Quote
As I have said last page, player police forces work perfectly. It is called Nullsec.
-áThough All Men Do Despise Us |
Ana Vyr
Vyral Technologies
239
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 13:51:00 -
[45] - Quote
Instant mega corrupt police force spotted ITT. |
Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
328
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 13:54:00 -
[46] - Quote
I will support this if gankers are given the option to anchor a Krispy Kremes in the system so as to create a slight delay on response time. Welcome to Eve Online. Don't expect people to be nice to you. |
Merovee
Gorthaur Legion Of Mordor
13
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 14:10:00 -
[47] - Quote
No Join CONCORD and become bounty hunters, high skill, high sec rating. Percent of bounty kept after taxes is related to the lower the system sec the [gank] lawful action was engaged . A bad kill will get you booted out of CONCORD or not let in.
|
Krios Ahzek
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
861
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 14:24:00 -
[48] - Quote
Join a nullsec alliance and call for defense forces any time a ganker gang makes it into your region of space.
-áThough All Men Do Despise Us |
Nylith Empyreal
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
109
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 14:58:00 -
[49] - Quote
I'd say severely nerf concord npcs, but keep them around and have some deputy program for pilots. "Oh, you can't help that," said the troll: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad." "How do you know I'm mad?" -ásaid the forumwarrior. "You must be," said the troll, "or you wouldn't have come here." |
Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
547
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 15:15:00 -
[50] - Quote
use concord battleships go to incursions neut and jam the sansha mothership ????? profit |
|
Dyner
Midgard Protectorate
99
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 15:23:00 -
[51] - Quote
Zane Kaiser wrote:Get rid of all the NPC Concord forces and replace them with players. Players who join the CONCORD force get a certain rank and are rewarded either ISK or loyalty points based on how many criminals they apprehend.
There will be little problem with abuse since you still can only shoot flagged players, and this will give gankers a fighting chance.
Hmm, "Deputize" players to acting on their behalf?
I LIKE IT!
|
Wodensun
ZeroSec
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 16:57:00 -
[52] - Quote
Shivus Tao wrote:I am in favor, only if consumable donuts are added that give us concord bonuses for 30 minutes or the duration of one ship chase.
Hahaahahaahaa +1 |
Yuri Krivoy
Crash Test Industries
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 18:16:00 -
[53] - Quote
I think it would be cool. Dont replace Concord though, just add players to the state police forces to keep them theam-y. (no concord ships for you) Players that join must maintain a +5 sec satus or better, and have good standing with their state. Maybe let players join at 0.0 (for new players) but if they drop at all they are kicked out with a big sec hit. (no trials allowed)
In high sec, when someone triggers a GCC in system, police members get a special signature on their directional scanner that lets them warp to 0. Maybe add a chat tab for police to alert of action in other systems. Allow them to drag the GCC signature to the chat window so they cant cry wolf without an actual GCC. |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
2004
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 18:25:00 -
[54] - Quote
I've been suggesting something like this for low sec for a long time.
Definitely something that has been discussed on and off with CCP by various CSMs. I hope we can bring some variation of this idea up with CCP again.
Issler |
Conrad Makbure
Phoibe Enterprises
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 18:44:00 -
[55] - Quote
NPC concord has to stay, they are everywhere all the time; that can't change. However I always felt that concord should recruit cadets with at least 5.0 sec status to assist with criminal activity and then have a rank system to be a full commissioned police officer with privileges, ships and modules of concord. |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
381
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 18:51:00 -
[56] - Quote
Krios Ahzek wrote:Join a nullsec alliance and call for defense forces any time a ganker gang makes it into your region of space. Point is.... why bother?
Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online: No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs.
NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA! |
Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
67
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 18:53:00 -
[57] - Quote
Bluddwolf wrote:I just posted this in another thread:
1. Eliminate Concord
2. Replace CONCORD with player based poilce force / faction police for specific region.
3. Criminals that are tagged with a -3.0 or worse can be hunted down by faction police, within their jurisdiction (regional).
4. Create a new skill for Faction Policing, where higher level unlocks Border Patrol skill that allows for jurisdiction to cross over into next jurisdiction by +1 jump per level. Have an even more advanced skill that allows for tru Bounty Hunting, extending jurisdiction to an entire Empire.
This system would create more opportunities for PVP. It would create a safer environment for miners, because a would be ganker would now have to worry more about getting podded by a player, and not an NPC. NPC kills don't register on the kill boards, these kills would.
CCP could even test this system out on a limited basis. They could start it out in the Starter areas, and then expand it from there.
The major trade hub systems (ie. Jita, Rens, etc.) could then remain under CONCORD control, and all PVP in those systems would be prohibited. No more Corporate offices or HQ's in those systems either. No mining, POSs, or PI. Nothing but safe access to trade hubs. I like it, like it a lot. Sounds like way fun, I'd sign up... |
Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
577
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 19:08:00 -
[58] - Quote
All of you who are looking for a player run CONCORD need to join null sec alliances.
That is a player driven concord. It's in your hands to defend the pilots of your space. In fact, these days null sec (at least my space) is safer than empire.
And no, this isn't a recruitment scheme. I wouldn't want 90% of you self entitled jerk-offs in my alliance. You all would expect that our home defense fleets don't come at a cost.
It's not rocket surgery. |
J3ssica Alba
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
335
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 19:19:00 -
[59] - Quote
So flying an iteron filled with donuts would guarantee CONCORD suicide ganking me ... This is my signature. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.-á Without me, my signature is useless. Without my signature, I am useless |
Telegram Sam
The Drones Club
274
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 19:25:00 -
[60] - Quote
I'd sign up a as a CONCORD deputy if it was like realistic police work. Fly around and randomly question and harass people. Treat everybody like they're a criminal, until they can prove otherwise. Issue citations to harmless people (such as miners). Drive like a maniac and use excessive force whenever there's any opportunity. But for this to work, we'll need some petty regulations to enforce. And some flashers and sirens for our ships. And some special NEX store uniforms. Oh yeah! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |