|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Frettren
|
Posted - 2009.05.20 19:29:00 -
[1]
How will you talk with Ank on matters subject to an NDA, should you get into the CSM? I would have thought that much of what the CSM discusses with CCP would be subject to such a thing.
|
Frettren
|
Posted - 2009.05.24 22:45:00 -
[2]
Ankhesentapemkah's repeated raising of the skill queue issue resulted in the implementation of a queue in the recent Apocrypha expansion
Not quite true...this didn't sit right, so I checked the issue records- Jade brought this up for a vote.
|
Frettren
|
Posted - 2009.05.25 22:07:00 -
[3]
Sure thing...here's the link for you and those interested:
http://wiki.eveonline.com/wiki/Skill_training_queue_%28CSM%29 |
Frettren
|
Posted - 2009.05.26 09:48:00 -
[4]
Actually, this was the time that the skill queue was taken to a CSM meeting with Jade as principal supporter, it was voted through to a CCP/CSM meeting, and at that meeting given high priority. CCP agreed to examine the skill queue and explore ways for implementation (CSM/CCP meeting minutes). Eight months later, a skill queue was introduced with the March 2009 expansion. In programming terms, given the other hurdles to overcome (ghost training etc) this is quick implementation.
Are you saying that you repreated raised this issue, despite the CSM assigning it high priority and CCP agreeing to examine it in depth (and obviously find a solution)?
Given that you have stated elsewhere in the forums that players that forum post aren't the sort Erik should be responding to, can you enlighten me as to how he will discuss/support/propose issues on the forums? Or can you confirm that this will be your responsibility, as Take Credit party will be elected (with Erik being the representative this CSM term).
|
Frettren
|
Posted - 2009.05.26 11:03:00 -
[5]
Sorry, Take Care- no troll intended! Edited to correct.
Could you point out the factual errors of my post regarding Skill queue? All the information is easily obtained via the evewiki and forum posts.
Additionally, can you address the last part of my post? I am considering voting, but would need to be assured that Erik will be active in the forums as CSM rep (and not have a spokesperson doing this task).
|
Frettren
|
Posted - 2009.05.26 13:06:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Frettren on 26/05/2009 13:09:35 Thanks for the response! Can you point me in the direction of the relevant paperwork? From the Evewiki, it reads as if the CSM1 raised issue, gave it priority and CCP then worked on a solution and implemented it within the year.
Just because my question may have been percieved to be from someone you may not like/agree with, does that make the question any less valid? I read the posts (from ALL parties, including yours) and am seriously wondering about this question.
|
Frettren
|
Posted - 2009.05.26 14:26:00 -
[7]
The forum, however is a PUBLIC discussion of ideas and views. Since the CSM are a publicly elected body and their dealings are supposed to be open, doesn't it make sense that the forums are the logical place to conduct discussions? Eve-mails tend to be between two parties, forums between many.
My question was whether Erik or a TC spokesperson (you or another) will be doing the forum posting/discussion if elected onto CSM (considering the opinion of the forum you have expressed).
|
Frettren
|
Posted - 2009.05.26 17:40:00 -
[8]
Issues have to be on the forum for a minium of 7 days of discussion before the CSM is even allowed to raise it. So anything we do will have to be public, and open for discussion, which we will actively participate in.
Can I infer from the above comment that it may not be Erik, as CSM rep, commenting on issues and such raised in Assembly hall and Jita park forums? Advisors or nominated spokepersons from Take care may be performing this role?
|
|
|
|