Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 23 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 48 post(s) |
Salpun
Paramount Commerce Masters of Flying Objects
251
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 22:28:00 -
[301] - Quote
An those with the fastist down load speed wins |
GeeShizzle MacCloud
132
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 22:29:00 -
[302] - Quote
holy functional servers CCP Batman! |
Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
356
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 22:32:00 -
[303] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Cearain wrote: I'm starting to think we are being trolled. I don't even know what to say to this. Quote:Last time I heard "just wait it will be awesome" was right before incarna. It WILL be awesome, if you own the systems. If you don't it will suck balls.
I suppose we should see if they make it more difficult to join the side that will have it awesome if you are on the side that sucks balls.
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:[
But that's the point. players have been begging for reward and consequence for years now, this is even one of the consequences that is player-requested (Many other FW pilots begged for it even though I personally hated the idea).
But again, until its been live on Tranquility, in the context of the rest of the game, and wars have been fought for some time with this new change, it is all just speculation at this point.
Yes the faction war community wanted consequences. But the "no docking" idea was by and large repeatedly rejected by the faction war community. If I am wrong please point me to the assembly hall thread or other thread where this idea ever really got allot of support from those in faction war.
That said it sounds like there are allot of good things in this expansion for faction war so I am not going to be overly negative.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
Dr Prometheus
Gears of Construction Gears Confederation
79
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 22:33:00 -
[304] - Quote
Update installed and connecting...
And logged in. Dude, where is my Charon? |
Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
330
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 22:33:00 -
[305] - Quote
After all this sitting on the edge of our chairs, was the news about "server will be up tomorrow" just another troll by CCP? Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |
Metal Icarus
xHELLonEARTHx Rookie Empire
125
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 22:39:00 -
[306] - Quote
Its online.... all of it..... my god....
Its.... the missles.... they......
....yes |
Aberadon Blackheart
Ozeki Corp.
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 22:41:00 -
[307] - Quote
Dr Prometheus wrote:So no-one has started SISI? So it has reached self awerness?
Seen this? ==> self awareness |
TheButcherPete
Specter Syndicate CORE Alliance
152
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 22:41:00 -
[308] - Quote
HOLY SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
927mb??! My moncole doubles as a cigarette lighter, a flashlight, a laser and x-ray goggles. If you haven't noticed yet, I'm in love with Punkturis. -á-á-á
|
Nalha Saldana
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
249
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 22:46:00 -
[309] - Quote
It has been confirmed, this patch is full of win
Extract: patch_win.exe... 100% |
Oppon's Pull
Wolfsbrigade Lost Obsession
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 22:48:00 -
[310] - Quote
The drake looks... interesting |
|
Ziven0x
Wrecking Shots Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 23:00:00 -
[311] - Quote
The new mods need to be seeded please. |
Salpun
Paramount Commerce Masters of Flying Objects
251
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 23:00:00 -
[312] - Quote
Having drake rendering issues BR#134188 |
Nalha Saldana
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
250
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 23:09:00 -
[313] - Quote
There is one BIG issue, the cargohold ui and station items are bound to each other. I want a nice big inventory in station and a small cargo box in the corner of my screen when undocked. Where the hell am i going to put this box so i can get the best of both? Its impossible =/
Also there is no way to see which ship is currently active, bring back the white box around it. |
Alexa Coates
The Scope Gallente Federation
108
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 23:12:00 -
[314] - Quote
5 minutes to download? NOT FAST ENOUGH
/me glares at my router and modem. Love my Gallente Federation Navy ships! |
Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
332
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 23:14:00 -
[315] - Quote
Okay, So far I'm really digging the look of the new missile launcher system. The graphics are great. But the sound... Yeah. The sounds I think need to be beefed up a whole ton. I just don't get the feeling of OMG when I shoot these babies off. Especially when compared to something like the 1400mms. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
2269
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 23:31:00 -
[316] - Quote
Cearain wrote: Yes the faction war community wanted consequences. But the "no docking" idea was by and large repeatedly rejected by the faction war community. If I am wrong please point me to the assembly hall thread or other thread where this idea ever really got allot of support from those in faction war.
This has always been one of the hot topics that caused much controversy. And you're right, in the end there were more people rejecting than embracing the idea. But that doesn't mean there weren't a good number of people that suggested it, which is all that I said.
This community feedback, along with my own opposition to total lockout (I personally favored station fire and denial of station services) is exactly what I shared with CCP.
We've got a couple of months at least before we find out whether the handful of doomsday predictions about FW actually come true, and at that point we will be able to give much more accurate feedback based on things we've actually seen happen.
....so now, back to oooohing and aaaaaahing about missiles!! (I can't wait to get home from work and grab some bombers) Vice Secretary of the 7th Council of Stellar Management.
|
|
CCP Ytterbium
C C P C C P Alliance
529
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 23:40:00 -
[317] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:sYnc Vir wrote:
No, the point is losing space when asleep cause it can be done in 5 hours. There is no fun to be had with that. However should it take longer then its something we can live with.
I absolutely agree 100%, this was something I was very firm with the developers about.
I can quote that for great justice, the CSM has been most helpful with discussing FW changes and bringing good points forward. We'll get started on a blog that explains most of the changes, expect it next week. |
|
|
CCP Goliath
C C P C C P Alliance
376
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 23:45:00 -
[318] - Quote
Ziven0x wrote:The new mods need to be seeded please.
Will get on this early tomorrow morning CCP Goliath | QA Director | @CCP_Goliath |
|
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
1555
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 23:55:00 -
[319] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:sYnc Vir wrote:
No, the point is losing space when asleep cause it can be done in 5 hours. There is no fun to be had with that. However should it take longer then its something we can live with.
I absolutely agree 100%, this was something I was very firm with the developers about. I can quote that for great justice, the CSM has been most helpful with discussing FW changes and bringing good points forward. We'll get started on a blog that explains most of the changes, expect it next week.
Hero dev post. Hans will probably send you flowers now. CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
1962
|
Posted - 2012.05.03 00:00:00 -
[320] - Quote
Please give CCP (and Hanns) a break here guys. I'm very new to Faction Warfare (as a full participant) but I've paid a lot of interest to the feature as an involved outsider since its introduction and I think the kind of changes coming are just the thing needed to spur a renewal of interest and violence. Its true what Hanns says - players of Faction Warfare have asked for occupancy to be significant for years now - don't get cold feet about the implications at the 11tth hour!
What needs to happen (and I think we can all help make it happen) is for CCP to commit long term to iterating properly on Faction Warfare and make it all it can be through a sequence of play balanced, play tested, and fully assessed changes. Maybe the occupancy might be a problem or need tweaking but who can really tell if you don't try it on the live server. I personally think it'll be great and will put the focus of combat away from station docking ramps and into the plexes and missions and whatnot where it should be happening.
But perhaps CCP won't get the plexing mechanics right first time - so they need to be encouraged to keep working on it until it is right.
From my perspective finally being able to do these plexes I think its an utter nonsense that minor (frigate/dessie) only plexes give as many vps as major (larger ship) plexes in a fraction of the capture time. I think a larger plex with more ship size allowed that needs longer to capture should certainly yield more capture points - but thats just a single example really of where the existing mechanics are awful.
Lets see what the whole system looks like as a whole before running around like headless chickens.
Poor hanns looks utterly frustrated about knowing what that whole looks like without being able to tell anyone due to :NDA: fingers crossed its good, but if it isn't then lets hold CCP to their promise to keep iterating and developing it until its right.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |
|
Sarmatiko
705
|
Posted - 2012.05.03 00:12:00 -
[321] - Quote
Looks like Harbinger V3 missing something. Not sure what exactly missing but ship looks plastic compared to other T1 amarr ships. |
Bienator II
madmen of the skies
693
|
Posted - 2012.05.03 00:18:00 -
[322] - Quote
Sarmatiko wrote:Looks like Harbinger V3 missing something. Not sure what exactly missing but ship looks plastic compared to other T1 amarr ships. agreed a eve-style bounty system https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=359105 You fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |
Hamster Too
Golden Fowl Silent Requiem
33
|
Posted - 2012.05.03 00:22:00 -
[323] - Quote
radecz3k wrote:MotherMoon wrote:radecz3k wrote:CCP Goliath wrote: GÇóFueled Shield booster (Small/Medium/Large Ancillary Shield Booster), using Cap Boosters as charges
Since you have working shield booster for fuel make us happy, and rename it to "Covert cloak" and remove cloaky 24/7 afk campers from eve. I would say we need more nerf of covert cloak than shield boosters for fuel... This would remove advantage of people who arent next to pc over people who are really active. what? Covert ops cloaking device using fuel in place of standard covert ops cloaking device, as one we have is overpowered. This will remove bombers and recons spending days in hostile systems blocking usage of system. This is seen in 0.0 on daily basics, and there is no way to catch cloaky people who just have pcs started 24/7. Covert cloak gives advantage to people with out of game resources like extra pcs running 24/7/extra account with covert toon. Using LO for fuel would reduce time spend in system cloaked to cargo bay. If cloaker would intall cargo expanders he would lose a lot of pvp ability at same time. I dont think that covert cloak should be used as weapon as there is no counter weapon for it. Also there is no need to be cloaked more than few hours.
AFK cloak whiners invaded SISI forum now?
Either grow a pair or move out of null. Or quit EVE. If the current state of null (safest space in EVE) is not safe enough for you then it is time to look for a new game. |
Jayrendo Karr
Suns Of Korhal Terran Commonwealth
80
|
Posted - 2012.05.03 00:41:00 -
[324] - Quote
Amarr ships are far too dull, they need to shine and stand out. |
Spc One
The Chodak Void Alliance
29
|
Posted - 2012.05.03 00:46:00 -
[325] - Quote
Jayrendo Karr wrote:Amarr ships are far too dull, they need to shine and stand out. Truth
|
Nalha Saldana
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
250
|
Posted - 2012.05.03 00:46:00 -
[326] - Quote
Got popped and now my Inventory is stuck on loading contents, seems buggy. |
GeeShizzle MacCloud
132
|
Posted - 2012.05.03 00:57:00 -
[327] - Quote
noticed some minmatar models dont show up in the hangars eg cheetah and scimitar for me.
i see where the new Inventory UI is going but theres some discrepancies eg:
Ships tree only shows assembled ships names and when they are shown you dont know what they are so u have to cycle through them all. Yes you can right click and open in a new window for a more traditional form but doing this all the time is tedious. normally accessing and moving ammo and drones into your active ship is a lil confusing cause your active ship doesnt appear on the ship list to right click and open cargo/dronebay etc...
Bombers are AWESOME!!! but the bomb launcher animation shouldnt retract in warp... cause 90% of bombs are dropped straight after exiting warp... and the bomb isnt there when you launch typically. Had a few issues with launching bombs ant them traveling infinitely for 100's of km's (all the way off grid)
|
Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
357
|
Posted - 2012.05.03 01:02:00 -
[328] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:sYnc Vir wrote:
No, the point is losing space when asleep cause it can be done in 5 hours. There is no fun to be had with that. However should it take longer then its something we can live with.
I absolutely agree 100%, this was something I was very firm with the developers about. I can quote that for great justice, the CSM has been most helpful with discussing FW changes and bringing good points forward. We'll get started on a blog that explains most of the changes, expect it next week.
If it takes longer that will just mean the side that has the biggest numbers will always be able to prevent the change and there is nothing a fast smaller fleet can do.
Denial of station access + long time delays before a system flips = sov null sec and big slow blobs always win.
If you are going to deny access at least make it easy to flip the system back without needing the blob. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
Ines Fy
Heroes of the Past Goonswarm Federation
39
|
Posted - 2012.05.03 01:06:00 -
[329] - Quote
just been on sisi:
Amarr Ships
guardian - some parts of the ship have too dark skin, in 0.0 you can barelly seen the details,even in station is not good.
Factional warfare
Factional warfare windows doesn't open from menu
New inventory window
AWESOME
but - missing capability to import and export custom filters, I have 7 accounts, 21 chars, creating each filter I need in each one will be a nightmare!, please implement import export of inventory filters!! - missing capability to create tabs/folders/virtual divisions to separate my stuff, still have to use cans... disapointed... - Also missing capability to use this new window to see my stuff on other stations...
bug: sometimes when using the filter in the top right I right something then go delete and doesnt should all my stuff, I have to press backspace one more time even with the filter field is empty.
|
Flakey Foont
Republic University Minmatar Republic
116
|
Posted - 2012.05.03 01:17:00 -
[330] - Quote
Invisible Drake, cleared cache. Still invis. Missile effects great. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 23 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |