He did. But you didn't. Please dont post anymore if you can't realize the problems.

This new inventory system worsen than old. Remove dockingbay and transfer ships to a merged inventory is a horrible idea.

Old Inventory system = Swiss Knife = Total Commander
New Inventory system = bags of crap = Windows Explorer

Who want to using W. Explorer if had Total Commander ?

Submenus under submenus lol and hangar have another submenus lol

The old system was inherently a multi-pane system because that was the only way it could be done. The new system tries to be a single-pane system, much like the Windows ExplorerGG* but the problem is that single panes are pretty useless, which is why tools like NC/TC were invented. It doesn't have everything in one place GGv it has one thing at a time in one place, and the main advantage is that you can quickly select which GG#one thingGG% out of everything you want to see. There's a subtle but very important different in how those two solutions give you access to GG#everything at onceGG%. Yes, just like Explorer, the new inventory lets you open multiple windows and thus emulate the old system (with a nice set of new features for each window), but in terms of having everything at your immediate disposal, it's no different from the old one because you still have to open all those windows. Only now, you have to shift-click a whole lot rather than have the different views you want open in new windows by default.

Now, in truth, neither system is even remotely like TC and the old one is unarguably lacking features, but at least it assumed that there would be multiple windows and you could arrange those windows in any setup you liked GGv the new ones wants to assume that there will only be one window, but the simple fact is that there won't be because that would be horribly inefficient (and it's exactly that inefficiency that the entire line of [whatever] Commanders throughout history has solved). Unfortunately, asking them to implement n-pane split views and quick tabs for different locations to begin to approach what TC lets you do might be a bit much at this pointGG*

I understand that there are always people who don't like something, especially when that something is new.

I understand that there are always people who don't like something, especially when that something is new.

What are you talking about? You need 2 windows - just open the second, reach the container or whatever you wish to see and .. profit.

Plus, you've totally forgotten about Ctrl+x, Ctrl+v functionality.

I understand that there are always people who don't like something, especially when that something is new.

Yea... I still think that this new inventory system is something I could live with as long they start to think it more like an access point or starting point to item management. In space it can be as basic as the cargo hold without side panel and with some basic functionality (ie ability to move item from loot container to parent cargo hold window*) and in station it can be something much bigger. The very basic idea behind this system however has to be that user wants to open new windows, opening them should be easy and their positions should be saved.

[lots of words]

Other thing worth mentioning is the neocom again. As minimizing the windows - chat, item management or browser window - has become real fun since the wonderful update - I would warmly recommend thinking about adding narrow 9-10 pixel task bar to bottom of the screen where you can minimize windows so that their labels remain visible. This would also host area for these additional inventory windows and you would get rid of the problem you are having with the inventory function's neocom button at the moment. Hell you could also have space to reinvent the date to the clock (!).

For instance, when I think GG#inventoryGG%, I see things like the station hangar, the corp hangar, the asset list, the corp asset listGG* and maybe the corp delivery hangar. I do not see things like ship cargo holds, drone bays, jetcans, wrecks, etc.

I understand that there are always people who don't like something, especially when that something is crap and worsen than before and much complicated to use.

It's just your opinion. You don't like it, I do like it. And many others really do like it.
I don't think that tastes of just a few people should be decisive. The new inventory will come to TQ because it's good and useful; maybe it needs some tweaks, but still it's good.

In short: make this the new assets window and leave the old windows as they are now, this would keep most people happy.

Inventory overhaul and no remote stacking?

The worst thing I have seen so far:

My ship has a max capacity of 77,879.7 m3, but the dynamic bar at the top is rounded up to 77,880. Trying to drag a 25 m3 mod when it shows 25 m3 free will give an error for not enough room. I had to go to the fitting window to find the exact capacity.

Please at least give an option to not round the capacity

And i playing almost 9 years ago and you playing 1.5.

Smart peoples know when a new changes bring more positive things than bad, but this crap bring more negative things than old one.

I write again this changes same when user changing back his old Total Commander to Windows Explorer.
This is a step back. I'm very happy if you want to click 100 times more than old item manager, but i do not want to receive tenosynovitis.
This new itempanel is horrible with 156789788 submenu and the inventory is jumbled, because all item merged to one place.
Oh yes the panel have filter and searching bar,you want to tell us, but just the idiots want to use more mouse clicks or more typing.