| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Reply to Topic | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Saia Tae Arragosa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
76
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 07:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
How ironic is it that CCP talks about risk-vs-reward yet allows players to skill up throw away alts, that can easily get into one of the cheapest ships in the game, where upon they can fly in high sec and blow up a ship 300 times the value of the ship they are flying?
Price a catalyst. Price a hulk.
People in low and null sec scream that there is a huge imbalance in regions and that high sec players don't take the kind of risk people in low sec and null sec take.
Bulldung...complete and utter bulldung.
People in high sec are at just as much risk, if not more, than people in null sec and low sec. There is zero risk involved when a player can easily skill up an alt to fly a destroyer that only cost around 2 mil to buy and arm it. So tell me people of null and low sec with your camped gates and well protected play areas - how is where you play any different than the people that play in high sec?
Anyone that has played the snooze fest that is 0.0 knows that this risk - vs - reward is total BS. If anything the average pilots that do fly hulks and orcas in high sec take bigger risk than anyone playing in null sec. Especially when a person can so easily get into a cheap ship and blow the crap out of them any time they please.
CCP allows this - calls it game play when in actuality it is them laughing at you for thinking you are safe. People in high sec are the least safe people playing EVE. Yes it is griefing...it is griefing because it is so easily done. CCP doesn't care. The people that use the tactic do not care.
They are trolling you and all you do is - go get another tube of lube and say - "please sir...may I have some more."
If you want this to stop it is up to us high sec players to unite. Demand justice! Demand that this form of griefing be stopped. Unite under one flag and declare war on CCP. Stop being a victim. Start being assertive! Demand your rights as a player that CCP fix this unabashed exploit and bring some sense of fair game play to an area of space that is suppose to be the lesser of three evils. As it is now that is not the case - high sec is the most dangerous place for players to play EVE.
So...it's up to you. You the pilots, traders, industrialist, miners and salvagers of high sec to take a stand if you wish to see high sec become less of the killing grounds that they are. Bring balance back to this region of space by petitioning CCP to stop trolling you and to provide the game of EVE that is fair to all who play it and not just a chosen few.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4053
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
Catalysts blow up Hulks because they're AFK and aren't taking the proper precautions to avoid getting blown up. End of story. "WeGGVre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4053
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
Oh and while you toss that whole "hurrr 300 mil ship dying to a much cheaper one" you should probably stay out of nullsec where expensive ships die to much, much cheaper ones all the time
see ratting tengus dying to solo hurricanes "WeGGVre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

malaire
391
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Saia Tae Arragosa wrote:... So...it's up to you. You the pilots, traders, industrialist, miners and salvagers of high sec to take a stand if you wish to see high sec become less of the killing grounds that they are. ... I am highsec trader and I do not care how dangerous it is to fly here. I do not fly here, I just use courier contracts to outsource the risk of getting ganked.
So for me there is nothing which needs to be fixed. 
New to EVE? Don't forget to read: The Manual * The Wiki * The Career Options * and everything else |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
838
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
only certain highsec miners feel entitled to afk fly in failfitted ships. |

Ludi Burek
The Player Haters Corp
55
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Null sec risk, is risk taken on willingly. High sec "risk" is taken on unknowingly by choosing to be totally oblivious to the world you live in. |

Vince Snetterton
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
160
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:13:00 -
[7] - Quote
Saia Tae Arragosa wrote:How ironic is it that CCP talks about risk-vs-reward yet allows players to skill up throw away alts, that can easily get into one of the cheapest ships in the game, where upon they can fly in high sec and blow up a ship 300 times the value of the ship they are flying?
Price a catalyst. Price a hulk.
People in low and null sec scream that there is a huge imbalance in regions and that high sec players don't take the kind of risk people in low sec and null sec take.
Bulldung...complete and utter bulldung.
People in high sec are at just as much risk, if not more, than people in null sec and low sec. There is zero risk involved when a player can easily skill up an alt to fly a destroyer that only cost around 2 mil to buy and arm it. So tell me people of null and low sec with your camped gates and well protected play areas - how is where you play any different than the people that play in high sec?
Anyone that has played the snooze fest that is 0.0 knows that this risk - vs - reward is total BS. If anything the average pilots that do fly hulks and orcas in high sec take bigger risk than anyone playing in null sec. Especially when a person can so easily get into a cheap ship and blow the crap out of them any time they please.
CCP allows this - calls it game play when in actuality it is them laughing at you for thinking you are safe. People in high sec are the least safe people playing EVE. Yes it is griefing...it is griefing because it is so easily done. CCP doesn't care. The people that use the tactic do not care.
They are trolling you and all you do is - go get another tube of lube and say - "please sir...may I have some more."
If you want this to stop it is up to us high sec players to unite. Demand justice! Demand that this form of griefing be stopped. Unite under one flag and declare war on CCP. Stop being a victim. Start being assertive! Demand your rights as a player that CCP fix this unabashed exploit and bring some sense of fair game play to an area of space that is suppose to be the lesser of three evils. As it is now that is not the case - high sec is the most dangerous place for players to play EVE.
So...it's up to you. You the pilots, traders, industrialist, miners and salvagers of high sec to take a stand if you wish to see high sec become less of the killing grounds that they are. Bring balance back to this region of space by petitioning CCP to stop trolling you and to provide the game of EVE that is fair to all who play it and not just a chosen few.
I have started several posts discussing this. I got an ingame email from someone who wants to start a blog. The only hope high players have left is as you say unite under a banner, then organize for next year's CSM to put at least 4 members in the top seven to form a bloc to counter the null sec zealots.
Quite frankly, it won't happen/. High sec players are typically far more casual about their gameplay and unlikely to coalesce about a group of people. High sec players are not worse player than the null sec zealots, just different, and likely with less time for the game. That means they equally won't have time to engage in the political process.
What is more likely is CCP will start adding up the subs and start seeing a dropoff by fall, as the 6 month/12 months subs clear out. Then and only then will CCP mgmt step in and start doing what is necessary, starting with the firing of ex-goon (or maybe not ex-goon?) CCP Soundwave, among others. But I doubt this may even happen.
The ultimate question is the null sec zealot faction within CCP so entrenched, so influential, so powerful, that even a drop in subs will not change the direction of the game.
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
594
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:17:00 -
[8] - Quote
Andski wrote:Oh and while you toss that whole "hurrr 300 mil ship dying to a much cheaper one" you should probably stay out of nullsec where expensive ships die to much, much cheaper ones all the time
see ratting tengus dying to solo hurricanes Aww, not the Titans dying to Hurricanes? Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Ayame Tao
State War Academy Caldari State
7
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:17:00 -
[9] - Quote
If a Catalyst can kill your Hulk - you deserve everything you get.
It should take a gang of 5 Catalysts or a couple of Tornados to take down a Hulk - oh wait... it does (when you do it right - avoid popular belts, fit tank, align, watch d-scan. End. Of. Story.)
I've mined all through ganks, events, hulkageddon etc with not a single loss. It pees me off that so many whiners give miners such a bad rep that James315's epic discourse becomes more and more true :(
*edit* I spells gud
and another thing... I'm not pro-null power bloc (they need reigning in too) nor am I anti-hisec, I just despise the incessant whining on topics that have been flogged to death and clearly demonstrated that CCP give less f*cks than the amount of tank the failfitters put on their 300 mill ship they leave unattended. Seriously, that's like leaving your Bugatti Veyron unlocked with the keys in in the dodgiest parts of town and expecting it to still be there after you left it fo half an hour to make a sandwich and watch TV. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4053
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Andski wrote:Oh and while you toss that whole "hurrr 300 mil ship dying to a much cheaper one" you should probably stay out of nullsec where expensive ships die to much, much cheaper ones all the time
see ratting tengus dying to solo hurricanes Aww, not the Titans dying to Hurricanes?
we've used supers on basically every titan kill we've had since dominion
we're way too bad to do it with subcaps "WeGGVre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
|

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
838
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:21:00 -
[11] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote:I have started several posts discussing this. I got an ingame email from someone who wants to start a blog. The only hope high players have left is as you say unite under a banner, then organize for next year's CSM to put at least 4 members in the top seven to form a bloc to counter the null sec zealots. The idiot npc forum alt demagogues that preceded you tried this already. |

Sisohiv
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
61
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:21:00 -
[12] - Quote
Ludi Burek wrote:Null sec risk, is risk taken on willingly. High sec "risk" is taken on unknowingly by choosing to be totally oblivious to the world you live in.
There in is the joke.
I don't live in EVE. It's a game.
Hulk was sold a month ago, Mackinaw Sold 2 months ago Providence sold last week.
All at 200% or more than what I paid for them.
I mined for something to do, not because I needed to do it. If other people are that horny to do it, go for it.
|

Joran Dravius
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
16
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:24:00 -
[13] - Quote
Andski wrote:Catalysts blow up Hulks because they're AFK and aren't taking the proper precautions to avoid getting blown up. End of story. This. |

Saia Tae Arragosa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
76
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:28:00 -
[14] - Quote
This has to do with fair and balanced play. Right now it is so lopsided in regards to how easily a player can train up an alt and use it to do one thing - grief - end of story. Most of the griefing takes place in high sec against new players who have not had the chance to skill up to a level that allows them to put up safe guards against such un-even odds and absolute un-balanced circumstances.
People in low and null sec scream all the time that the risk vs reward for them is not in-line with the players of high sec. I call BS on that because we all know the truth. The truth is that a player can easily train an alt, buy a cheap throw away ship and grief whom ever they please at no risk to them. End of story. |

Josef Djugashvilis
145
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:36:00 -
[15] - Quote
Saia Tae Arragosa wrote:How ironic is it that CCP talks about risk-vs-reward yet allows players to skill up throw away alts, that can easily get into one of the cheapest ships in the game, where upon they can fly in high sec and blow up a ship 300 times the value of the ship they are flying?
Price a catalyst. Price a hulk.
People in low and null sec scream that there is a huge imbalance in regions and that high sec players don't take the kind of risk people in low sec and null sec take.
Bulldung...complete and utter bulldung.
People in high sec are at just as much risk, if not more, than people in null sec and low sec. There is zero risk involved when a player can easily skill up an alt to fly a destroyer that only cost around 2 mil to buy and arm it. So tell me people of null and low sec with your camped gates and well protected play areas - how is where you play any different than the people that play in high sec?
Anyone that has played the snooze fest that is 0.0 knows that this risk - vs - reward is total BS. If anything the average pilots that do fly hulks and orcas in high sec take bigger risk than anyone playing in null sec. Especially when a person can so easily get into a cheap ship and blow the crap out of them any time they please.
CCP allows this - calls it game play when in actuality it is them laughing at you for thinking you are safe. People in high sec are the least safe people playing EVE. Yes it is griefing...it is griefing because it is so easily done. CCP doesn't care. The people that use the tactic do not care.
They are trolling you and all you do is - go get another tube of lube and say - "please sir...may I have some more."
If you want this to stop it is up to us high sec players to unite. Demand justice! Demand that this form of griefing be stopped. Unite under one flag and declare war on CCP. Stop being a victim. Start being assertive! Demand your rights as a player that CCP fix this unabashed exploit and bring some sense of fair game play to an area of space that is suppose to be the lesser of three evils. As it is now that is not the case - high sec is the most dangerous place for players to play EVE.
So...it's up to you. You the pilots, traders, industrialist, miners and salvagers of high sec to take a stand if you wish to see high sec become less of the killing grounds that they are. Bring balance back to this region of space by petitioning CCP to stop trolling you and to provide the game of EVE that is fair to all who play it and not just a chosen few.
Above sounds like a fool 0.0 player trying to make hi-sec players look stupid. You want fries with that? |

Rikanin
Wargasm Inc
16
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:42:00 -
[16] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Vince Snetterton wrote:I have started several posts discussing this. I got an ingame email from someone who wants to start a blog. The only hope high players have left is as you say unite under a banner, then organize for next year's CSM to put at least 4 members in the top seven to form a bloc to counter the null sec zealots. The idiot npc forum alt demagogues that preceded you tried this already.
Do you get money every time you whine about someone posting with an NPC corp alt? I swear you must because it's all you ever ******* do
|

malcovas Henderson
Smoking Minerals Syndicate Cannabis Legionis
28
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:42:00 -
[17] - Quote
Saia Tae Arragosa wrote:How ironic is it that CCP talks about risk-vs-reward yet allows players to skill up throw away alts, that can easily get into one of the cheapest ships in the game, where upon they can fly in high sec and blow up a ship 300 times the value of the ship they are flying?
Price a catalyst. Price a hulk.
People in low and null sec scream that there is a huge imbalance in regions and that high sec players don't take the kind of risk people in low sec and null sec take.
Bulldung...complete and utter bulldung.
People in high sec are at just as much risk, if not more, than people in null sec and low sec. There is zero risk involved when a player can easily skill up an alt to fly a destroyer that only cost around 2 mil to buy and arm it. So tell me people of null and low sec with your camped gates and well protected play areas - how is where you play any different than the people that play in high sec?
Anyone that has played the snooze fest that is 0.0 knows that this risk - vs - reward is total BS. If anything the average pilots that do fly hulks and orcas in high sec take bigger risk than anyone playing in null sec. Especially when a person can so easily get into a cheap ship and blow the crap out of them any time they please.
CCP allows this - calls it game play when in actuality it is them laughing at you for thinking you are safe. People in high sec are the least safe people playing EVE. Yes it is griefing...it is griefing because it is so easily done. CCP doesn't care. The people that use the tactic do not care.
They are trolling you and all you do is - go get another tube of lube and say - "please sir...may I have some more."
If you want this to stop it is up to us high sec players to unite. Demand justice! Demand that this form of griefing be stopped. Unite under one flag and declare war on CCP. Stop being a victim. Start being assertive! Demand your rights as a player that CCP fix this unabashed exploit and bring some sense of fair game play to an area of space that is suppose to be the lesser of three evils. As it is now that is not the case - high sec is the most dangerous place for players to play EVE.
So...it's up to you. You the pilots, traders, industrialist, miners and salvagers of high sec to take a stand if you wish to see high sec become less of the killing grounds that they are. Bring balance back to this region of space by petitioning CCP to stop trolling you and to provide the game of EVE that is fair to all who play it and not just a chosen few.
You do realise the value of the ship is irrevalent. The Hulk could cost any where from 0 - infinate amounts of isk. It will still blow up as easily, if not looked after properly.
o7 |

Saia Tae Arragosa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
76
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:46:00 -
[18] - Quote
malcovas Henderson wrote:Saia Tae Arragosa wrote:How ironic is it that CCP talks about risk-vs-reward yet allows players to skill up throw away alts, that can easily get into one of the cheapest ships in the game, where upon they can fly in high sec and blow up a ship 300 times the value of the ship they are flying?
Price a catalyst. Price a hulk.
People in low and null sec scream that there is a huge imbalance in regions and that high sec players don't take the kind of risk people in low sec and null sec take.
Bulldung...complete and utter bulldung.
People in high sec are at just as much risk, if not more, than people in null sec and low sec. There is zero risk involved when a player can easily skill up an alt to fly a destroyer that only cost around 2 mil to buy and arm it. So tell me people of null and low sec with your camped gates and well protected play areas - how is where you play any different than the people that play in high sec?
Anyone that has played the snooze fest that is 0.0 knows that this risk - vs - reward is total BS. If anything the average pilots that do fly hulks and orcas in high sec take bigger risk than anyone playing in null sec. Especially when a person can so easily get into a cheap ship and blow the crap out of them any time they please.
CCP allows this - calls it game play when in actuality it is them laughing at you for thinking you are safe. People in high sec are the least safe people playing EVE. Yes it is griefing...it is griefing because it is so easily done. CCP doesn't care. The people that use the tactic do not care.
They are trolling you and all you do is - go get another tube of lube and say - "please sir...may I have some more."
If you want this to stop it is up to us high sec players to unite. Demand justice! Demand that this form of griefing be stopped. Unite under one flag and declare war on CCP. Stop being a victim. Start being assertive! Demand your rights as a player that CCP fix this unabashed exploit and bring some sense of fair game play to an area of space that is suppose to be the lesser of three evils. As it is now that is not the case - high sec is the most dangerous place for players to play EVE.
So...it's up to you. You the pilots, traders, industrialist, miners and salvagers of high sec to take a stand if you wish to see high sec become less of the killing grounds that they are. Bring balance back to this region of space by petitioning CCP to stop trolling you and to provide the game of EVE that is fair to all who play it and not just a chosen few.
You do realise the value of the ship is irrevalent. The Hulk could cost any where from 0 - infinate amounts of isk. It will still blow up as easily, if not looked after properly. o7
Value of the ship is not irrelevant - not to a new miner or a freighter pilot - especially when you consider the amount of effort a new player probably put into obtaining enough ISK to get into it in the first place.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4056
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:47:00 -
[19] - Quote
Saia Tae Arragosa wrote:This has to do with fair and balanced play. Right now it is so lopsided in regards to how easily a player can train up an alt and use it to do one thing - grief - end of story. Most of the griefing takes place in high sec against new players who have not had the chance to skill up to a level that allows them to put up safe guards against such un-even odds and absolute un-balanced circumstances.
People in low and null sec scream all the time that the risk vs reward for them is not in-line with the players of high sec. I call BS on that because we all know the truth. The truth is that a player can easily train an alt, buy a cheap throw away ship and grief whom ever they please at no risk to them. End of story.
yeah you have a point
those poor new players in their hulks "WeGGVre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Saia Tae Arragosa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
76
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:54:00 -
[20] - Quote
Andski wrote:Saia Tae Arragosa wrote:This has to do with fair and balanced play. Right now it is so lopsided in regards to how easily a player can train up an alt and use it to do one thing - grief - end of story. Most of the griefing takes place in high sec against new players who have not had the chance to skill up to a level that allows them to put up safe guards against such un-even odds and absolute un-balanced circumstances.
People in low and null sec scream all the time that the risk vs reward for them is not in-line with the players of high sec. I call BS on that because we all know the truth. The truth is that a player can easily train an alt, buy a cheap throw away ship and grief whom ever they please at no risk to them. End of story. yeah you have a point those poor new players in their hulks
Is it not better to create an atmosphere that is conducive to getting more people to play and "stay", rather than be a total ass and make the game a place people toss up their hands in frustration and walk away? Only an idiot would not want to see more people playing. Only an idiot would condone un-balanced game play. Only an idiot would want to drive players away because CCP needs less money for the further development of EVE. |
|

Kietay Ayari
Caldari State
399
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:55:00 -
[21] - Quote
You are 100% right, nulsec is safer than highsec, and it is for good reason. It takes hundreds and sometimes thousands of people working together, leadership and logistics and defence groups to keep 0.0 safe. The safety is earned by the hard work and endless CTAs of the people who enjoy building something like that in EVE.
The safety of Highsec is not far behind, and you have to do literally nothing to obtain it. Fair. Ferox #1 |

Josef Djugashvilis
145
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 08:59:00 -
[22] - Quote
A player happily mining away in hi-sec, should not be attacked any more than a lone player happily belt ratting in lo-sec or 0.0 should be attacked.
You want fries with that? |

Saia Tae Arragosa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
76
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 09:01:00 -
[23] - Quote
Kietay Ayari wrote:You are 100% right, nulsec is safer than highsec, and it is for good reason. It takes hundreds and sometimes thousands of people working together, leadership and logistics and defence groups to keep 0.0 safe. The safety is earned by the hard work and endless CTAs of the people who enjoy building something like that in EVE.
The safety of Highsec is not far behind, and you have to do literally nothing to obtain it. Fair.
Then perhaps null sec players should stop doing their damndest to drive new players away and instead - bring them into the fold and get them into that part of the game. Recruit people with less than 5 mil sp actively. Most established 0.0 corps won't even look at a 5 mil specced player let alone give them the time of day. So what is the new player to do while they skill up to the point that a 0.0 corp will even look at them - oh yea...grab a tube of lube because the very people that they maybe one day playing with in null and low sec will be doing their best to grief the crap out of them in high sec.
|

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
621
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 09:02:00 -
[24] - Quote
I play in Hisec and Nullsec.
I have ice miners in nullsec and the risk of losing a whole fleet by missing even a few seconds of intel is huge. The same with hauling anything around. You think smartbombing BSs are bad with their 5km range? 4 or 5 stealth bombers can murder an entire fleet in one bombing run even if your fleet is spread out.
In nullsec you pay bilions of isk for your services, upgrades and so on, your intel is player run, your safety is in teh hands of your freinds.
I have a Mack/Hulk pilot in Hisec I mine afk alot, I fly around alot, I haul stuff alot adn I have never once lost a ship in hundreds and hundreds of hours hisec mining and hauling.
In hisec I dont pay anything for any upgrades, I dont need intel, i dont need scouts, i dont need roaming home defence fleets, I dont even need to be at my keyboard.
Dont assume that just because people play their main game in nullsec that they dont also play in hisec too. It makes you look stupid.
Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
621
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 09:04:00 -
[25] - Quote
Saia Tae Arragosa wrote: Then perhaps null sec players should stop doing their damndest to drive new players away and instead - bring them into the fold and get them into that part of the game. Recruit people with less than 5 mil sp actively. Most established 0.0 corps won't even look at a 5 mil specced player let alone give them the time of day. So what is the new player to do while they skill up to the point that a 0.0 corp will even look at them - oh yea...grab a tube of lube because the very people that they maybe one day playing with in null and low sec will be doing their best to grief the crap out of them in high sec.
Do you know why? Becasue if you dont then there is absolutely no point explaining it to you. I regularly take in under 5 mill sp people, if they are known to a corp member who will vouch for them. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Saia Tae Arragosa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
76
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 09:06:00 -
[26] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:A player happily mining away in hi-sec, should not be attacked any more than a lone player happily belt ratting in lo-sec or 0.0 should be attacked.
Nobody is saying people should not be attacked in high sec. But there should be game mechanics in place that stop the ongoing griefing that occurs via broken game mechanics. It isn't helping anyone and least of all new players that are doing their best to get a foothold in a game that will be trying enough once they do. There are legitimate means for people to fight all they want in high sec. There is no need for the ease at which people can abuse the use of alts to grief to the hearts content without any risk. |

malcovas Henderson
Smoking Minerals Syndicate Cannabis Legionis
28
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 09:10:00 -
[27] - Quote
Saia Tae Arragosa wrote:
Value of the ship is not irrelevant - not to a new miner or a freighter pilot - especially when you consider the amount of effort a new player probably put into obtaining enough ISK to get into it in the first place.
Value of the ship does not affect its performance. You can buy a Hulk for 1 ISK, or buy a Hulk for a Billion ISk. It will still be a Hulk. Just because you paid 300 mill ISK for it, does not mean it should in someway, be better than the one I bought for 195 mill Isk. I can tell you right now. My cheaper Hulk will less likely be ganked by 2-3 Dessies, than someone who paid 300 mill, and not look after it.
Again cost is irrevelant. What is irrevelant is a players awareness to his surroundings.
I would like to also point out. That during Hulkageddon I have made close to 2 billion isk mining in Hi sec. If I am caught unawares, because I have been aware of my surroundings, looked after my ships, I can easily afford to replace my Hulk. Add to this the fact I am a noob still. If I can do it, so can everyone else. A little bit of L2play goes a very long way.
o7 |

Josef Djugashvilis
145
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 09:13:00 -
[28] - Quote
You cannot be a 'new' player and fly a Hulk.
You want fries with that? |

malcovas Henderson
Smoking Minerals Syndicate Cannabis Legionis
28
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 09:15:00 -
[29] - Quote
bad posting |

Kietay Ayari
Caldari State
399
 |
Posted - 2012.05.06 09:28:00 -
[30] - Quote
Saia Tae Arragosa wrote:Kietay Ayari wrote:You are 100% right, nulsec is safer than highsec, and it is for good reason. It takes hundreds and sometimes thousands of people working together, leadership and logistics and defence groups to keep 0.0 safe. The safety is earned by the hard work and endless CTAs of the people who enjoy building something like that in EVE.
The safety of Highsec is not far behind, and you have to do literally nothing to obtain it. Fair. Then perhaps null sec players should stop doing their damndest to drive new players away and instead - bring them into the fold and get them into that part of the game. Recruit people with less than 5 mil sp actively. Most established 0.0 corps won't even look at a 5 mil specced player let alone give them the time of day. So what is the new player to do while they skill up to the point that a 0.0 corp will even look at them - oh yea...grab a tube of lube because the very people that they maybe one day playing with in null and low sec will be doing their best to grief the crap out of them in high sec.
You do not have the right to demand or even say what anyone should do. If an alliance doesnt want to recruit a certain type of person they do not have to and they will either suffer the consequences of a poor choice or have the benefits of a good choice. Considering most alliances do not get people under 5m sp it might occur to you there is a good reason for that.
Your entire counter argument to the fact that they have earned everything they have while highsec players have not is: they should help highsec players more? Why? Why should those with ability waste time with those that have none? Anyone can go to 0.0 and try to create something of their own, anyone can join in something others are creating too.
Personally I do not care either way, what astounds me is the number of people who are not willing to work for anything and try to use some faulty moral code along with their helplessness to justify their request for others to do things. Ferox #1 |
|
|
|
| |
Reply to Topic |
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |