Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
|
Posted - 2009.05.13 11:33:00 -
[1]
"A generator that is invented out a crashed sleeper battleship and is the first hybrid sleeper module that has been created by scientist. This module will extend the lenght of wormholes by 100%. This module can only be anchored within 10 km of a wormhole"
A generator that can be anchored like a bubbel that allow a whole too be longer open as usualy. Maybe double its time. It only need to be anchord on 1 side. This will not allow mass too be extended. Once anchored a timer is is visable, when the timer runs out, the wormhole collapses and the generator will be automaticly unachored. If u unanchor it the wormhole will instand collaps due "severly disruped phenomina inside the wormhole" Achor time is 60 minuts. The generator will automaticly detect a wormhole when anchored within 10km of 1 and will boost that wormholes time. The generator has 1.000.000 hp and once it recieves damage while anchored a mail will be send too the anchorer (like the POS mails). Generator will be 3000m3 and will requier 150m sleeper salvage too be built + some random ore.
Discuss
|
ShadowDraqon
The Quantum Company
|
Posted - 2009.05.13 11:42:00 -
[2]
Edited by: ShadowDraqon on 13/05/2009 11:42:26 Has possible potential. I won't say anymore, for my lack of experience.
~ MED-SEC ~ AND The Blatantly Obvious |
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
|
Posted - 2009.05.13 20:46:00 -
[3]
soo more people got any idea's about this idea?
|
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 20:35:00 -
[4]
perfect for the wormhole production problem
|
Shadow's Caress
Dark Skullz Empire
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 21:50:00 -
[5]
Food for thought:
As it stands, it is difficult to get a capital ship into a specific wormhole system. Multiple capitals is out of the question. Capitals cannot jump to wormhole systems. These two factors together mean that a deathstar POS inside a wormhole system is nigh invulnerable. Taking one out would mean squeezing a dread through every wormhole of applicable size over the period of about a month. Not to mention moving the capitals into a new position that is randomly placed around eve just to get into each new wormhole. I repeat, deathstar POSes in wormhole systems are effectively invulnerable. A wormhole stabilizer that allows more mass would potentially allow multiple capitals to jump through one wormhole, allowing an attacking force a chance to destroy deathstar POSes in wormhole space.
Is this good or bad? I'll leave that up to you.
|
Teras Menac
Gallente Action Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 21:54:00 -
[6]
I like it
/signed
|
ShadowDraqon
The Quantum Company
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 22:17:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Shadow's Caress Food for thought:
*long text*
Is this good or bad? I'll leave that up to you.
He said it would double the time a WH stays open, which is reasonable.
He never said it would turn a wormhole into a super-stargate for capitals, mass variables would remain the same. You'd just have longer to fool around in the WH, you wouldn't be able to bring more through.
~ MED-SEC ~ AND The Blatantly Obvious |
Santiago Fahahrri
Galactic Geographic
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 23:47:00 -
[8]
I don't like it. Any form of wormhole stabalization is the first step towards large alliance domination of w-space. ~ Santiago Fahahrri Galactic Geographic |
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
|
Posted - 2009.05.15 11:18:00 -
[9]
The current time of class 5's is 24 hours. To kill sleepers in a class 5 u schould be in a rr bs group of atleast 5/6 people. Since people dont ninja class 5's u can assume that these classes are done by small corporations that operate out of a POS. Too get that kind of people online at the same time u need a pretty active corp. Since people arnt playing eve 24/7 (well, .. some do)u just havnt enough time to exploit the wormhole properly.
|
Vengence MK2
|
Posted - 2009.05.17 22:03:00 -
[10]
signed^10
Wormholes stay open for far too little time. The wormhole stabilizer should have a drawback however, like requireing fuel or lowering the mass that can jump through. It would only be logical, since the EVE gate had a stabilizer too ;) |
|
Mrsticks
Minmatar RNCGM Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.05.17 22:21:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Vengence MK2 signed^10
Wormholes stay open for far too little time. The wormhole stabilizer should have a drawback however, like requireing fuel or lowering the mass that can jump through. It would only be logical, since the EVE gate had a stabilizer too ;)
I seem to recall the Eve gate LOLOMGWTFBBQing a system...
Long Live TEXAS! Texans join the Texas channel in game plz.
|
Halycon Gamma
Caldari The Flying Tigers United Front Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.17 22:23:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Vengence MK2 signed^10
Wormholes stay open for far too little time. The wormhole stabilizer should have a drawback however, like requireing fuel or lowering the mass that can jump through. It would only be logical, since the EVE gate had a stabilizer too ;)
And look what happened to the Eve Gate!!!!
I vote no for big wormhole of doom explody thing-a-majigger!!!
|
Nnamuachs
Caldari Kiith Paktu Veneratio Venator Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.18 01:51:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Shadow's Caress Food for thought:
As it stands, it is difficult to get a capital ship into a specific wormhole system. Multiple capitals is out of the question. Capitals cannot jump to wormhole systems. These two factors together mean that a deathstar POS inside a wormhole system is nigh invulnerable. Taking one out would mean squeezing a dread through every wormhole of applicable size over the period of about a month. Not to mention moving the capitals into a new position that is randomly placed around eve just to get into each new wormhole. I repeat, deathstar POSes in wormhole systems are effectively invulnerable. A wormhole stabilizer that allows more mass would potentially allow multiple capitals to jump through one wormhole, allowing an attacking force a chance to destroy deathstar POSes in wormhole space.
Is this good or bad? I'll leave that up to you.
Too bad that in most cases it is a huge isk sink to anchor and fuel any longterm towers in WH space, especially deathstars, due to sites within the system spawning very rarely once completed.
|
Clansworth
Good Rock Materials
|
Posted - 2009.05.18 05:30:00 -
[14]
It is something CCP has said they are toying around with in the future.. would be a ways off though, as the WH is a relatively unstudied phenomenon, it will take some time before such mastery is possible. Also, Sleeper tech shouldn't necessarily be used, as it seems the wormholes are a new development, and sleepers were gone LONG before they showed up.
Intel Boost |
BlyTwo
|
Posted - 2009.05.18 06:31:00 -
[15]
Edited by: BlyTwo on 18/05/2009 06:31:09 A stabilizer would be great, but it would take the risk factor and some of the thrills of entering sleeperspace...
|
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
|
Posted - 2009.05.18 07:16:00 -
[16]
Edited by: Mr LaboratoryRat on 18/05/2009 07:18:09 that is true but this brings another big risk... if the generator get shot the wormhole collapses.. and everybody is stuck
The pice issue is something that need some thoughts, it need to cost alot so that when its used it wont be wasted on a bad way. Example too keep a high sec entrance open.
Maybe it only can be anchored near specific class of wormholes, preventing abuse
|
Kaylan Jahlar
Minmatar Minmatar Industrial Limited
|
Posted - 2009.05.18 11:22:00 -
[17]
I think it's a good idea, but it would have to be done on both sides and not just one. It would be very expensive to maintain and would require valuable sleeper components to make. It would also require advanced fuels as it would take a huge amount of constant energy to keep a wormhole stabilized like this.
|
Dave Meltdown
Capital Construction Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.05.27 12:16:00 -
[18]
/signed
|
Benny Lavasminorbunengin
Amarr Benny Lava Rulez
|
Posted - 2009.06.14 09:28:00 -
[19]
good idea
|
Patoa
Core Impulse
|
Posted - 2009.06.14 13:08:00 -
[20]
Possibly good idea with some tinkering. I like wormholes but I do think the risk/reward balance is too high on the risk side atm i.e. the wh might collapse, no local, sleepers can wtfpwn you etc etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |