Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
kongking wang
|
Posted - 2009.05.24 02:04:00 -
[1]
no1
firstly why are all mining ships past cruiser size all gallente faction and have resists etc to go with this. this gives some factions advantage over anyone in a mining ship meaning its not ballanced. realisticly every race would have its own ships but in eve we dont.
what i suggest is making these ships neutral having fixed equel ammounts in resists therfore giving no advantage to any race. also this would have the added affect of not having to compensate for the racial discrepency in resists by adding resist modules.
no2
we all know mining ships cant tank anything so why so many mid slots and so little low slots.the only thing these ships have going for them in that department is structure. therfore allowing more low slots and natural resists to these ships would allow for them to structure tank far better than they can using shield and armour. to prevent the over use of cargo expanders and turning these ships into super soloers i suggest a cap for expanders. like the turret/missile hard points for high slots the low slot should have expansion hard points. this would limmit expander usage meaning the ships cargo would remain the same as normal. this would also if you chose to leave your ship defenceless to fit mining upgrades which dont seem to get used often if at all
|
AtheistOfDoom
Amarr The Athiest Syndicate Advocated Destruction
|
Posted - 2009.05.24 02:12:00 -
[2]
Obvious troll is obvious And then, he killed the dog... |
Jin Labarre
|
Posted - 2009.05.24 02:25:00 -
[3]
The Retriever has:
EM 60 EX 10 KIN 25 THERM 35
That is not a Gallente resistance distribution. It is Minmatar. Minmatar get the bonus on EM. Gallente have improved Kinetic.
|
kongking wang
|
Posted - 2009.05.24 03:00:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Jin Labarre The Retriever has:
EM 60 EX 10 KIN 25 THERM 35
That is not a Gallente resistance distribution. It is Minmatar. Minmatar get the bonus on EM. Gallente have improved Kinetic.
ty for pointing that out but i think the point is still valid. these ships are so weak anyway why have differences in resists.if im going to shoot im going to shoot what i have loaded. and im almost certainly going to get a kill. even against the highest resist. we have neutral modules in the game i.e invulns etc so why not the only ships every race use.
|
Clansworth
Good Rock Materials
|
Posted - 2009.05.24 04:21:00 -
[5]
ty for pointing that out but i think the point is still valid. these ships are so weak anyway why have differences in resists.if im going to shoot im going to shoot what i have loaded. and im almost certainly going to get a kill. even against the highest resist. we have neutral modules in the game i.e invulns etc so why not the only ships every race use. If resists don't really matter, because the ship is going to go down anyways, what was the point of the thread?
Intel/Nomad |
Alexander Bor
|
Posted - 2009.05.24 07:35:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Alexander Bor on 24/05/2009 07:36:50 Edited by: Alexander Bor on 24/05/2009 07:35:55 hi kongking!
I agree that divers of miner ships is very poor. I bielive that there will be many of them in future.
By the way, we discuss a such kind of theme here: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1079599
enjoy!
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |