| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
435
   |
Posted - 2011.11.03 17:07:00 -
[31] - Quote
KaarBaak wrote:
Yes...the truth hurts when you say it out loud. You'd rather they continue to blow smoke up your ass?
I like the game. I don't like devs over-hyping upcoming updates. That's what creates the cynicism.
I agree completely. My frustration over the Faction Warfare debacle isn't that they aren't fixing it fast enough, its that they keep mentioning it, than refusing to release any details. Players at this point feel like they're giving feedback to a brick wall.
It'd be a lot easier if they just said, "we're too busy right now, maybe in the future...." instead of mentioning it in a list than not following through or even talking about it.
|
Cpt Fina
The Tuskers
70
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 17:37:00 -
[32] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:You see....we're planning. BIG time!
dang! Am I the only one that's excited over this? |
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
90
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 17:43:00 -
[33] - Quote
KaarBaak wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Razin wrote:How was the fishing? It was pleasant thank you. We are going to finish this feature and put it on TQ, the only question right now is "when". I spoke to Team BFF who own this feature and as I suspected, an ETA is hard to get right now for the exact same reason that ETAs on other feature have been hard to come by in the last couple of weeks. You see....we're planning. BIG time! And we basically can't wait to tell you more about all that. But right now it's hard to give substantial information about specific features so I'm just gonna bite my tongue and keep you all in suspense for just a LITTLE while longer. Sorry about that :P *bites tongue* You guys say this ALL the time. It has yet to live up to the hype. EDIT: 50% of the BIG things get pulled prior to patch. 30% make it ti Sisi, but not TQ. 15% make it to patch notes, but then get pushed off for unforeseen problems (eg this thread) never to be seen again. 5% make it to TQ bugged. Leaving us with maybe 10% of the original plan making it into the game. Not to mention the things that break as a result of that implementation. Stop talking, start doing.
Clearly you have not worked in a software development role before.
Believe me, it always seems easy but when you get down to the code, it takes longer.
Then comes testing - whereby you have to make sure you didn't break anything.
|
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
194
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 18:18:00 -
[34] - Quote
Razin wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:
This board has a very nasty habit of taking an offhand comment and turning it into a promise CCP hand chiseled into stone tablets.
The BMs in overview feature was not an "offhand comment". It was a promise made by CCP Soundwave back in the spring of this year. This was touted as an important item of one of the team BFF signature patches, somewhat delayed due to 'stuff' at the time.
I remember it being mentioned, I did not remember it being promised... at least not promised to be delivered within a specific time frame. You could very well be correct, it's been awhile.
The post was in response to someone pretty much going off the deep end, making wild accusations and generalizations about a lot of things (not just the bookmark issue)... so I'm going to stand by the point I made.
To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |
Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron
Legion of xXDEATHXx
80
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 18:46:00 -
[35] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:
I remember it being mentioned, I did not remember it being promised... at least not promised to be delivered within a specific time frame. You could very well be correct, it's been awhile.
It was in the patch notes for a May 2011 BFF patch. Then it was removed with a "will be added in a later patch" explanation from Fallout; and that's when CCP Soundwave added that they are "fixing it as we speak though". Pretty much a promise.
|
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
194
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 19:58:00 -
[36] - Quote
Razin wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:
I remember it being mentioned, I did not remember it being promised... at least not promised to be delivered within a specific time frame. You could very well be correct, it's been awhile.
It was in the patch notes for a May 2011 BFF patch. Then it was removed with a "will be added in a later patch" explanation from Fallout; and that's when CCP Soundwave added that they are "fixing it as we speak though". Pretty much a promise.
In that particular case agreed.
To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |
KaarBaak
140
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 00:57:00 -
[37] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Razin wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:
I remember it being mentioned, I did not remember it being promised... at least not promised to be delivered within a specific time frame. You could very well be correct, it's been awhile.
It was in the patch notes for a May 2011 BFF patch. Then it was removed with a "will be added in a later patch" explanation from Fallout; and that's when CCP Soundwave added that they are "fixing it as we speak though". Pretty much a promise. In that particular case agreed.
Apology accepted.
|
non judgement
Without Fear
Flying Burning Ships Alliance
138
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 01:05:00 -
[38] - Quote
You guys notice corp bookmarks on sisi? |
Bienator II
24th Imperial Crusade
Amarr Empire
248
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 01:08:00 -
[39] - Quote
non judgement wrote:You guys notice corp bookmarks on sisi?
yes but thats off topic
You fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |
non judgement
Without Fear
Flying Burning Ships Alliance
138
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 01:10:00 -
[40] - Quote
Bienator II wrote:non judgement wrote:You guys notice corp bookmarks on sisi? yes but thats off topic
Its only slightly off topic. At least it shows they are doing things with bookmarks. |
Mistress Lilu
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 02:37:00 -
[41] - Quote
This feature would be awesome...make it happen CCP, what do I pay your for. |
non judgement
Without Fear
Flying Burning Ships Alliance
139
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 02:52:00 -
[42] - Quote
Mistress Lilu wrote:This feature would be awesome...make it happen CCP, what do I pay your for.
Why are you asking what do you pay their for? If you paid their for something, I'd think you'd know what you paid.
You pay a private company for game time. They use the money for lots of things. One of those things happens to be developing things for you. If I remember correctly the money that you gave them went to CCP people who moderate the forums. |
Algathas
Drama Llamas
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 05:46:00 -
[43] - Quote
Yes please! I was in a situation just the other day where I was thinking "what happened to that proposed bookmarks on overview feature". |
Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron
Legion of xXDEATHXx
98
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 19:49:00 -
[44] - Quote
Sill no word from CCP... How about it Sounwave, it was your promise. |
Shaera Taam
Minmatar Death Squad
Broken Chains Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 02:42:00 -
[45] - Quote
yeah, it would be nice to hear /something/
esp after guard's remarks back in september
sigh...
Thus Spake the Frigate Goddess! |
Terminal Insanity
Convex Enterprises
The Silent One's
113
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 04:14:00 -
[46] - Quote
I would like to have bookmarks show up as HUD icons, like other celestials/stations/etc |
Komen
Capital Enrichment Services
39
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 14:20:00 -
[47] - Quote
Not empty bumpin'.
Ranger1, I agree, a lot of people conflate 'proposed features' with 'promises'. The trouble is that CCP has had the bad habit of giving out a list of features in development early on, then some drop, then some more, then more still. What we end up with at the end, in the published expansion, seems like pretty thin gruel.
Crucible, on the other hand, is an expansion with excellent advertising. A couple of features haven't made the final cut (assault frigs being the one I can think of) but lots, and lots, and lots of stuff appears to be on Sisi right now, and even in functional, working condition.
Anyways...CCP Guard! I summon thee! Go fishing please! We hunger for updates! |
Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf
Fatal Ascension
148
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 15:37:00 -
[48] - Quote
Komen wrote:KaarBaak wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Razin wrote:How was the fishing? It was pleasant thank you. We are going to finish this feature and put it on TQ, the only question right now is "when". I spoke to Team BFF who own this feature and as I suspected, an ETA is hard to get right now for the exact same reason that ETAs on other feature have been hard to come by in the last couple of weeks. You see....we're planning. BIG time! And we basically can't wait to tell you more about all that. But right now it's hard to give substantial information about specific features so I'm just gonna bite my tongue and keep you all in suspense for just a LITTLE while longer. Sorry about that :P *bites tongue* You guys say this ALL the time. It has yet to live up to the hype. EDIT: 50% of the BIG things get pulled prior to patch. 30% make it ti Sisi, but not TQ. 15% make it to patch notes, but then get pushed off for unforeseen problems (eg this thread) never to be seen again. 5% make it to TQ bugged. Leaving us with maybe 10% of the original plan making it into the game. Not to mention the things that break as a result of that implementation. Stop talking, start doing. This. Well said. The list of 'promised vs. delivered features' is really, at this point, appalling. CCP could make entire expansions of the 'left on the drawing board features' that never made it in. Stuff that the playerbase was really, REALLY eager for (and some not so much, but still). Also I'd like to re-iterate my position now, which I might just make into a sig, that the proposed null-sec revamp is fine, dandy, great, whatever. But within that re-vamp, low-sec should be included and have distinct characteristics/activities assigned as well. Otherwise it will be left as it currently is - a broken area of the game with the worst attributes of null-sec and high-sec combined.
I agree, and they should name the patch Crucible.
It's not Rocket Surgery |
Komen
Capital Enrichment Services
40
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 15:44:00 -
[49] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:I agree, and they should name the patch Crucible.
I see what you did thar.  |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |