Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Inegma
|
Posted - 2009.12.16 23:05:00 -
[121]
Ubuntu 9.10 x64 Kernel 2.6.32-020632-generic wine-1.1.34
|
Laice
Caldari Novus Aevum Dominatus Novus Aevum
|
Posted - 2009.12.17 00:26:00 -
[122]
Ubuntu 9.10 64bit Wine 1.1.34
Click HD for HD Goodness :P
|
Sythyss
External Democracy
|
Posted - 2009.12.19 19:02:00 -
[123]
arch linux ftw!! =D
|
Aimel
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2009.12.26 18:53:00 -
[124]
ubuntu 9.10 64bit
|
Damion Jawface
Caldari Darkhold Enterprises
|
Posted - 2009.12.28 21:23:00 -
[125]
OpenSUSE 11.2 x64
|
rokkram
|
Posted - 2010.01.03 03:42:00 -
[126]
OpenSuse 11.2 x64
|
Franzr Sturm
|
Posted - 2010.01.04 23:58:00 -
[127]
Gentoo (2.6.31-gentoo-r6)
Nice to see that people are using linux :) |
Pradev
Caldari Solaris Project Black Rise Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.01.06 12:17:00 -
[128]
Arch Linux x64 with wine 1.0.1 :) |
Magnus Nordir
Caldari Nordir Industries
|
Posted - 2010.01.11 10:55:00 -
[129]
I use Linux 2.6.32.
What the OP was apparently trying to ask is which GNU/Linux distribution we're using - and that would be Arch x64 for me. --------------------------- Only those who surrender are lost |
Aimel
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2010.01.12 00:39:00 -
[130]
crunchbang 9.4 64bit
whats so good about arch? ;=)
|
|
Chillshock
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 17:16:00 -
[131]
currently: ubuntu lucid hunting bugs and loving it.
Want more performance, tho and currently Eve likes to crash when switching desktops. *grrr*. Once I find the time... need time... more time...
|
Magnus Nordir
Caldari Nordir Industries
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 19:09:00 -
[132]
Originally by: Aimel crunchbang 9.4 64bit
whats so good about arch? ;=)
It's "simple" in that the distro gets out of your way and lets you set up the system the way you want it instead of holding your hand and making design decisions you should be making - unlike some other software distributions of the GNU/Linux operating system (ubuntu and its derivatives come to mind). --------------------------- Only those who surrender are lost |
Darion Amador
Viper Squad Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2010.02.20 08:00:00 -
[133]
Unix
Linux is for wimps! Also, Linux sucks
|
Miyamura Miyako
Nihon Hikikomori Kyokai
|
Posted - 2010.02.21 06:54:00 -
[134]
Slackware -Current 32bit with vanilla kernel
|
Magnus Nordir
Caldari Nordir Industries
|
Posted - 2010.02.21 10:11:00 -
[135]
Originally by: Darion Amador Unix
Linux is for wimps! Also, Linux sucks
The modern "Unix" distributions (Solaris and HP-UX, one of which you're probably referring to) have just about as much in common with Unix as GNU/Linux does. --------------------------- Only those who surrender are lost |
MvoS
|
Posted - 2010.02.22 10:03:00 -
[136]
Slack 13
|
Gunman1982
|
Posted - 2010.02.23 15:17:00 -
[137]
2.6.32-trunk-686-bigmem (Debian 2.6.32-5) Debian testing/unstable
Future aim: Minix :-)
|
Darion Amador
Viper Squad Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2010.02.23 20:22:00 -
[138]
Originally by: Magnus Nordir
Originally by: Darion Amador Unix
Linux is for wimps! Also, Linux sucks
The modern "Unix" distributions (Solaris and HP-UX, one of which you're probably referring to) have just about as much in common with Unix as GNU/Linux does.
I'm referring to the BSD distributions. And they have little to nothing in common with GNU/Linux. A higher degree of screening and auditing, it's cleaner and better maintained, more stable, more robust system all together. And there is no denying it. I could allays dig up some benchmarks for you if you would like that, as well.
|
Kaylana Syi
Minmatar Stimulus Rote Kapelle
|
Posted - 2010.03.01 20:32:00 -
[139]
Originally by: Darion Amador
Originally by: Magnus Nordir
Originally by: Darion Amador Unix
Linux is for wimps! Also, Linux sucks
The modern "Unix" distributions (Solaris and HP-UX, one of which you're probably referring to) have just about as much in common with Unix as GNU/Linux does.
I'm referring to the BSD distributions. And they have little to nothing in common with GNU/Linux. A higher degree of screening and auditing, it's cleaner and better maintained, more stable, more robust system all together. And there is no denying it. I could allays dig up some benchmarks for you if you would like that, as well.
That is rubbish. BSD is no faster or stable than a solid Linux distro. You pull your benches I'll pull mine. They both have tradeoffs. Also, look up the definition of rubust. Are you really trying to say NETBSD is even in the same category of FreeBSD, Debian's BSD kernel or OpenBSD?
Please, you don't have to even try to pimp out BSD. It doesn't need your help. It sure as **** doesn't run games any better than Linux. And let's not forget that the only BSD thing about OSX is the userspace... the kernel isn't even BSD... it's Mach's successor.
I'd run BSD for a jails server for VPS web hosting, and that is about it. It would be Debian's upcoming version at that.
Team Minmatar
|
Thastandi
|
Posted - 2010.03.05 01:32:00 -
[140]
Hey, EVE noob here...I'm totally loving this game so far -- best game I think I've played.
I run EVE via Wine in Arch and Mint, both 64 versions. I change the distro depending on my mood. I have some problems in Arch, for some reason; but, I think that might be because I built wine for 64 bit libs with Pulseaudio support (via the AUR.) I might try it sans Pulse to see if that gets it to work any better.
|
|
Karteepy
|
Posted - 2010.03.13 18:50:00 -
[141]
Am I the only one in here that's running Mandriva? :) 2010.0.
|
Ben AdonKar
Minmatar LifeLine Solutions
|
Posted - 2010.03.14 06:59:00 -
[142]
you are not alone in space :) Mandriva 2010.0 x86_64 free here. kernel 2.6.31.12
using both from repos: wine 1.1.37 with fglrx 10.1 on ATI HD4670 dualhead, performance is perfect. ________________________________________ the drowning man who climbs on your shoulders to save himself is understandable-except when you see it happen in the drawing room.
dune |
Neuntausend
The Blood Money Cartel
|
Posted - 2010.03.18 21:41:00 -
[143]
Originally by: Sythyss arch linux ftw!! =D
yeah, arch. just arch - no numbers, no strange codenames.
i don't get what people like about stable release distros |
Brennivargur
|
Posted - 2010.03.27 16:09:00 -
[144]
Linux 2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64
|
Jack Rowanburn
V I R I I Cult of War
|
Posted - 2010.04.02 14:50:00 -
[145]
Arch x64, Suse x86_64 Wine 1.1.41 from AUR. With the most recent update you need samba installed for some reason too (calls on one of the NT libs - only discovered that because I was trying to get Eve up and running before installing the NTFS/Samba packages)
Originally by: Thastandi Hey, EVE noob here...I'm totally loving this game so far -- best game I think I've played.
I run EVE via Wine in Arch and Mint, both 64 versions. I change the distro depending on my mood. I have some problems in Arch, for some reason; but, I think that might be because I built wine for 64 bit libs with Pulseaudio support (via the AUR.) I might try it sans Pulse to see if that gets it to work any better.
Don't use pulse, it's flaky at best and it'll work just fine without. Also make sure you have all the 32bit Wine libs installed - Wine itself is still only 32bit. -------------
Originally by: CCP Wrangler
These players, now all they'll do is post and post about the extension to the extended downtime. Geez, it's not the end of the world after all...
|
Neuntausend
The Blood Money Cartel
|
Posted - 2010.04.03 18:17:00 -
[146]
Edited by: Neuntausend on 03/04/2010 18:22:47 pulse audio in arch linux x64 works just fine, enables me to use mangler as a native vent client and provides a lot better sound quality than alsa-oss with the native teamspeak 2 vlient.
if you know how to do it that is.
i had problems with arch x64, pulse and wine as well, because arch doesn't offer a 32bit build of wine patched for pulse audio, neiter in aur, nor the standard repos. wine with the alsa wrapper or padsp won't work, because neither pulse audio nor wine pill in lib32-pulseaudio (and wine needs that, because it's a 32 bit app - at least if you want it to run 32 bit windows apps, as eve.)
so there's two things you have to do:
1: the easy part:
yaourt -Sy lib32-pulseaudio (if you have yaourt, if not i guess you will know how to do that manually, if not: rtfm)
2: the not so easy part:
either install 32 bit arch on another disk or computer or set up a 32bit environment inside your 64 bit installation (that's what i did. rtfm), chroot into it and build wine-pulse from aur there. (also works with yaourt, if you want) then don't install the package there, but copy it over to your 64 bit system. you can then install it outside of the chroot by typing:
pacman -U <packagename>
you have to do this, because building wine-pulse in 64 bit will give you a 64 bit binary, and you don't want that, as it will only work with windows-64bit-software, what eve isn't.) this is just the quick and dirty solution, but i am too lazy to do it the clean arch way. also it works just fine, so i just have no reason to. it is possible that you also need to install several 32bit libs, as lib32-libpng, but they are all in the repos or aur.
if you people are interested in the package, just let me know. i can build and upload the package for you, but i won't make a regularily updated aur pkgbuild for it.
also: brenni - this is getting old, i think we all know what linux is a kernel, but this is not quite what the thread is about.
and now, enough offtopic-spam by me today.
|
Nurias
|
Posted - 2010.04.04 11:06:00 -
[147]
Having always a mixture of Debian testing/sid (x86_64) where most packages are from testing which is at the time of writing Squeeze.
Debian - best package management I've ever experienced
|
Maladapt
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.04.04 15:05:00 -
[148]
Currently Ubuntu, though it's really nice to see some Slackers here. That's how I got introduced into the fold. ;)
|
das licht
Gallente Echtzeit AG
|
Posted - 2010.06.04 19:04:00 -
[149]
I started out with Linux Mint 8 Helena a few month ago. Meanwhile i am using Ubuntu 10.04 which Mint is based on. I think i stick with 10.04 because i always prefer the original.
|
Thastandi
|
Posted - 2010.06.05 00:19:00 -
[150]
Edited by: Thastandi on 05/06/2010 00:20:09
Originally by: Neuntausend Edited by: Neuntausend on 03/04/2010 18:22:47 pulse audio in arch linux x64 works just fine, enables me to use mangler as a native vent client and provides a lot better sound quality than alsa-oss with the native teamspeak 2 vlient.
I might be interested. I'm currently using Alsa (with dmix support). Everything works quite perfectly (that is, Teamspeak + EVE or Mangler + EVE).
HOWEVER, I use two sound cards (USB and internal), and if I want to switch the output channel I have to quit X, edit ~./asoundrc, and restart ALSA. Not a huge problem, but its enough.
I tried Pulseaudio about 6 months ago, and the problem was getting wine to work properly with it (by the way, I use Arch 64, as well.)
EDIT: Ah, I see you use a chroot...hmm...might be better in the long run...but, I'm a little trigger shy on setting up a chroot for some reason.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |