Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
red dwarrf
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 01:05:00 -
[1]
Why hasn't CCP addressed this yet? There is no counter measure to someone AFK cloaking a system for days except to decloak once a day for a kill. There should be a counter measure!!!
|
elscorcho
Remus inc
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 01:08:00 -
[2]
Originally by: red dwarrf Why hasn't CCP addressed this yet? There is no counter measure to someone AFK cloaking a system for days except to decloak once a day for a kill. There should be a counter measure!!!
Your counter measure should be warping fast.
That, and hope the sucker is AFK at the time of your arrival. ____________________________________
I also go by the name 'luvs2spooge'. |
Saju Somtaaw
Gallente Kiowa Tribe MagiTech Corp
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 01:08:00 -
[3]
Working as intended, and it's 23/7 cloaking due to DT. ---- --- ---
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&thread |
Irida Mershkov
Gallente War is Bliss
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 01:09:00 -
[4]
24/7? but the server is down for an hour a day! how are they staying there man?!
|
Lady Spank
Amarr Sekret Kool Klubb
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 01:11:00 -
[5]
Ignore it? Kill it? Conduct your business in a group? Move system?
The quality of my replies is directly related to the QQuality of the opÆs comments |
Sloppy Podfarts
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 01:14:00 -
[6]
He's right! We need something that lets us fight these invisible, and thus invincible, chucklebunnies!!
|
Arec Bardwin
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 01:14:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Arec Bardwin on 18/08/2009 01:15:27 Minimize local, problem solved.
Originally by: Sloppy Podfarts
Dude, u sad?
|
Mr Flibblle
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 01:17:00 -
[8]
No, I am asking why there is not a counter measure to decloak, or perhaps a pop-up that makes the cloaker interact to stay cloaked. I really want to hear constructive conversation on this. Moving systems is not always possible, neither is working in groups, etc. I just think there should be some way to level the playing field, just like all the other weapons/strategies in the game.
|
Spurty
Caldari D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 01:18:00 -
[9]
Cloakers phear them .. online your cyno jammers .. don't undock .. wait for local to vanish and .. well you never know they are there until you do a lock down of a system for 30mins and then hit F10 to check the map ;0
Seriously, cloaking ships?
CCP, nothing to see here, move along to do 'real work' please ;0
Originally by: Cat o'Ninetails i for one, like 8's that look like 9's lol
|
Santiago Fahahrri
Galactic Geographic
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 01:22:00 -
[10]
Working as intended. ~ Santiago Fahahrri Galactic Geographic |
|
Bestofworst Worstofbest
Caldari Science and Trade Institute
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 01:28:00 -
[11]
I'm preety sure if they are cloaked and afk that they can't hurt me ________________________________________________
My Music
Posts slowly rising in quality to the decline of my dignity. |
Bestofworst Worstofbest
Caldari Science and Trade Institute
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 01:29:00 -
[12]
I'm preety sure if they are cloaked and afk that they can't hurt me ________________________________________________
My Music
Posts slowly rising in quality to the decline of my dignity. |
Iva Soreass
Gentlemen Bastards
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 01:41:00 -
[13]
lrn2play
Fit your 'ratting ship' with a warp jammer, have a friend 'cloak' too when the so called '24/7 afk' cloaker uncloaks > warp jam > buddy uncloaks > dead afk'r..
Please resize sig to a maximum of 400 x 120 - Mitnal |
Sloppy Podfarts
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 01:42:00 -
[14]
Massive plasma nets, 10au x 10au in size, dragged behind massive capital ships! Drag a system clean in a matter of hours!! Supplies are limited so call now!!!
|
Jeebus Cynoalt
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 01:45:00 -
[15]
The obvious solution is to make a pve server.
Once it's made you should go there and leave the rest of us alone.
|
Roemy Schneider
Vanishing Point.
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 02:13:00 -
[16]
it's the only way to keep the macros at bay and CCP happily rakes in the money for both accounts. - putting the gist back into logistics |
temponita
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 02:21:00 -
[17]
Originally by: red dwarrf Why hasn't CCP addressed this yet? There is no counter measure to someone AFK cloaking a system for days except to decloak once a day for a kill. There should be a counter measure!!!
Why?
|
Gin G
Halls Of Valhalla
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 02:25:00 -
[18]
if there cloaked 23/7 then there not harming you in the slightest all you need is enough of a pair to undock and go about you dailey eve life Please refrain from editing a moderator's warning. Zymurgist |
Larkonis TrassIer
Neo Spartans Laconian Syndicate
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 02:46:00 -
[19]
0.0 Carebears... best carebears.
Go back to hisec. Please resize your signature to the maximum allowed of 400 x 120 pixels with a maximum file size of 24000 bytes. Navigator |
Herzog Wolfhammer
Gallente Aliastra
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 02:56:00 -
[20]
Translation of OP:
"What are they doing in MY system? Why do they have to come to MY system? What are they doing here? I can't gank them! Why? Marsha Marsha Marsha!!!!!!!!"
Best solution to this problem is to get rid of local, so you don't know they are there.
Even the freaking carebears would like to see no local in 0.0.
|
|
Santiago Fahahrri
Galactic Geographic
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 02:59:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Herzog Wolfhammer Why? Marsha Marsha Marsha!!!!!!!!"
~ Santiago Fahahrri Galactic Geographic |
Cyprus Black
Caldari 4 wing Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 03:26:00 -
[22]
What would you guys think about an anchorable device that must be inside a POS? A device that uses fuel of some kind or another to send out a one time omni-directional pulse throughout the entire system that decloaks everyone, friend and foe alike. Toss in a cooldown timer and a one per system limit count on these devices.
Would this be an acceptable compromise?
With a cooldown timer it would prevent spamming the device. Plus anyone who is hiding in the system cloaked could simply reactivate their cloaking device.
|
VonCruix
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 03:34:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Irida Mershkov 24/7? but the server is down for an hour a day! how are they staying there man?!
This
|
Iria Ahrens
Amarr 101st Space Marine Force Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 03:44:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Larkonis TrassIer 0.0 Carebears... best carebears.
Go back to hisec.
lol.
We get our own share of afk cloakers. But other than spending a few mins asking around to find out what the person is flying when I log on, it's business as usual.
Seriously OP. If you're afraid of dying or losing your ship, you shouldn't be in null sec. Fly something smaller, clone jump to something with cheaper implants, and go kill something. --
EVE is about balls, brains, and paranoia. SP comes in a distant fourth place. |
Ephemeron
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 03:45:00 -
[25]
Originally by: red dwarrf Why hasn't CCP addressed this yet? There is no counter measure to someone AFK cloaking a system for days except to decloak once a day for a kill. There should be a counter measure!!!
The best way to make this problem go away is to nerf local.
Local should not give intel to AFK cloakers!
Remove local now!!!
|
Kuar Z'thain
Fraser's Finest Minor Threat.
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 03:48:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Larkonis TrassIer 0.0 Carebears... best carebears.
Go back to hisec.
|
VonCruix
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 03:49:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Ephemeron
Remove local now!!!
Oh yea, this as well.
|
Khemul Zula
Amarr Keisen Trade League
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 03:55:00 -
[28]
Edited by: Khemul Zula on 18/08/2009 03:55:27 I sat in Amarr while cloaked for days once. It did not shut down the system.
Originally by: Cat o'Ninetails i am your brain on boosters lol
|
Frobos
Weird Cat Research Zombie Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 04:07:00 -
[29]
Originally by: red dwarrf ...There should be a counter measure!!!
Why, it's just going to get nerfed!
|
Mr Flibblle
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 05:05:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Cyprus Black What would you guys think about an anchorable device that must be inside a POS? A device that uses fuel of some kind or another to send out a one time omni-directional pulse throughout the entire system that decloaks everyone, friend and foe alike. Toss in a cooldown timer and a one per system limit count on these devices.
Would this be an acceptable compromise?
With a cooldown timer it would prevent spamming the device. Plus anyone who is hiding in the system cloaked could simply reactivate their cloaking device.
Well, this is only one of 2 intelligent replies. Guess it was too much to ask the Keyboard Cowboys here to try and answer with something other than "go back to Hisec".. oh well, it was worth a shot. Once again, you dumba**s prove that you really don't have to be that smart to play Eve. Now flame away LOL.....
|
|
Tippia
Raddick Explorations
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 05:27:00 -
[31]
Originally by: Mr Flibblle Well, this is only one of 2 intelligent replies.
You get the answers you deserve. Idiotic question → stupid answers.
Considering you then go off an insult players who didn't agree with the idea (or, rather, didn't agree that there even is a problem to solve) you actually got better answers than you deserved.
You want a counter measure? Fit some guns. Problem solved. ——— “If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡… you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.” — Karath Piki |
sooperkool
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 05:53:00 -
[32]
I am an AFK cloaker and I take offense to this thread.
There are may reasons why I go AFK is systems and cloak.
1) I have to take a bio break 2) I smell food 3) There is something to do besides play eve (yeah right) 4) I am bored 5) To make people like the OP freak out and NEVER UNDOCK because my uber DPS cloaked Arazu will totally win
Now to be totally serious its mostly number 2.
to the op, A cloaked ship cannot do anything to you except watch you. If you are smart, long strech I know, keep your eye on local and with the other one that looks off in a different direction watch your overview. Local spike = run.
|
Jin Nib
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 05:57:00 -
[33]
I wish I knew if it was only a matter of time before CCP removed local and solved this cloaking problem.
CCP, remove local NAO!
-Jin Nib Trading on behalf of Opera Noir since: 2009.03.02 03:53:00
|
sooperkool
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 05:57:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Jin Nib I wish I knew if it was only a matter of time before CCP removed local and solved this cloaking problem.
CCP, remove local NAO!
this.
|
May Burke
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 06:19:00 -
[35]
Working as intended
|
Novemb3r
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 07:09:00 -
[36]
I never understand these kinds of posts.
If the guy is AFK and loaking then he can't hurt you, he can't provide free intel or anything else because he's AFK.
If he's not AFK and cloaking then he's playing so there's no problem, and if he's not AFK and not cloaked you can kill him.
So in 2 of the 3 possible scenarios he's playing the game and in 2 of the 3 possible scenarios he can't actually hurt you.
Try not being a whiney *****. That might help the situation also. -
|
Sidus Isaacs
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 07:13:00 -
[37]
Originally by: red dwarrf Why hasn't CCP addressed this yet? There is no counter measure to someone AFK cloaking a system for days except to decloak once a day for a kill. There should be a counter measure!!!
How about you waterboard on your own tears over to WOW? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://desusig.crumplecorn.com/sigs.html |
Salmeria
Advanced Component Research Enterprise
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 07:20:00 -
[38]
this thread is more like "I AM SCARED OF CLOAKED SHIPS!"
|
Jin Nib
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 07:26:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Novemb3r I never understand these kinds of posts.
If the guy is AFK and loaking then he can't hurt you, he can't provide free intel or anything else because he's AFK.
If he's not AFK and cloaking then he's playing so there's no problem, and if he's not AFK and not cloaked you can kill him.
So in 2 of the 3 possible scenarios he's playing the game and in 2 of the 3 possible scenarios he can't actually hurt you.
Try not being a whiney *****. That might help the situation also.
Whoa! Careful there. Logic need not apply. It would invalidate his whine.
-Jin Nib Trading on behalf of Opera Noir since: 2009.03.02 03:53:00
|
VonCruix
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 07:30:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Salmeria this thread is more like "I AM SCARED OF CLOAKED SHIPS!"
/Que Monty Python and the Holy Grail... "AAHhhh.. \0/ Run away!"
|
|
Rellik B00n
Lethal Death Squad
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 07:33:00 -
[41]
Edited by: Rellik B00n on 18/08/2009 07:34:19
Originally by: red dwarrf Why hasn't CCP addressed this yet? There is no counter measure to someone AFK cloaking a system for days except to decloak once a day for a kill. There should be a counter measure!!!
regardless of how much the fan-bois say otherwise this is the bottom line:
Originally by: red dwarrf There should be a counter measure!!!
I have never once seen a reasonable answer given as to what the counter to the tactic is.
Originally by: red dwarrf There should be a counter measure!!!
Everything should have a counter in a game of this type.
Originally by: red dwarrf There should be a counter measure!!!
indeed there should.
edit: go search for some nano/falcon threads, i bet all the pro-23/7 cloakers are in there explaining why they shouldnt be changed cruiser & rig BPOs LDS kb |
Cpt Cosmic
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 07:36:00 -
[42]
I dont care about cloakers
but afkers should be kicked of the server after 10 minutes, not only the one in space but also those docked => less people on server => less lag => less lag results in more fun for the others
|
Sidus Isaacs
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 07:48:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Cpt Cosmic I dont care about cloakers
but afkers should be kicked of the server after 10 minutes, not only the one in space but also those docked => less people on server => less lag => less lag results in more fun for the others
No, not really. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://desusig.crumplecorn.com/sigs.html |
Melissa Ravenflame
Caldari Zulu Squadron
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 08:00:00 -
[44]
The counter to a cloaker in 0.0 is to not 100% fit your ratting ship in 0.0 space for PvE. Instead, you have to trade off being as efficient a ratter as possible against having some kind of PvP defence/offence. You also have to watch local / overview and not go afk yourself.
If you want to be able to rat in peace with a 100% PvE fit with 'almost' no chance of being attacked then join an NPC corp and go to Empire. Otherwise, you have to accept that 0.0 can be an unpleasant place and you have to fit accordingly.
|
Gnulpie
Minmatar Miner Tech
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 08:01:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Cpt Cosmic I dont care about cloakers
but afkers should be kicked of the server after 10 minutes, not only the one in space but also those docked => less people on server => less lag => less lag results in more fun for the others
1000 people just doing nothing, being afk will consume only very little resources, creating almost no lag.
100 people doing big battle will create A LOT of lag.
So?
KICK PEOPLE DOING PVP BECAUSE IT CREATES LAG!!!
|
Cpt Cosmic
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 08:09:00 -
[46]
Edited by: Cpt Cosmic on 18/08/2009 08:11:46 actually the server has to create a thread (or a process in other words) for every one that joins eve, although a thread in network programming is mostly a lightweight process (mostly because it depends on what you do with it and noone except ccp knows their code and how they handle their stuff) and I think it would be still better to kick afkers and free the ressources :) it is a matter of efficiency hehe
|
Vanzatoarea
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 08:18:00 -
[47]
funny
not afk cloaking is the issue , cloaking itsself is . Now all of you cloaking defenders , explain please why there should be a module granting total invulnerability?
Cloaking as it is now is a great tool for macroers , not against macroers . How many times do you see cloaky ravens around?
And if someone is in 0.0 or a player corp , the carebear status does nolonger apply.
If by carebear you mean someone that seeks to minimize the risks in whatever it is they are doing , then newsflash , everyone and anyone is a carebear , and the "cloak on everything" people are the leading carebears
|
Gypsio III
Dirty Filthy Perverts
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 08:18:00 -
[48]
Originally by: red dwarrf Why hasn't CCP addressed this yet? There is no counter measure to someone AFK cloaking a system for days except to decloak once a day for a kill. There should be a counter measure!!!
OH GOD 0.0 IS DANGEROUS? HOW CAN THIS BE?? I SHOULD BE ABLE TO CAREBEAR AWAY IN COMPLETE SAFETY!
I DEMAND THAT LOCAL IS REMOVED SO THAT THE CLOAKERS CAN NO LONGER SEE ME!
|
Vanzatoarea
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 08:25:00 -
[49]
Originally by: Melissa Ravenflame The counter to a cloaker in 0.0 is to not 100% fit your ratting ship in 0.0 space for PvE. Instead, you have to trade off being as efficient a ratter as possible against having some kind of PvP defence/offence. You also have to watch local / overview and not go afk yourself.
If you want to be able to rat in peace with a 100% PvE fit with 'almost' no chance of being attacked then join an NPC corp and go to Empire. Otherwise, you have to accept that 0.0 can be an unpleasant place and you have to fit accordingly.
Oh the arogance is strong within this one!
How about this : Make cloaked ships probable somehow , then the cloaker will allso taste the dark dangerous 0.0 . As it is now , you need to be a total idiot to lose a cloaked t2 cruiser hull (recon , hac) to any sort of rating BS . Your entire argument is irrelevant
The thing is not the raters who want to rat in peace (those just fit cloaks themselves you know.....) , the issue is the people who find it right to be in 0.0 without any risk whatsoever to themselves
So please understand the argument , you`re geting it all wrong : It`s not the locals terified by the cloakers asking for safety (though that`s what you like to think , after all cloak an alt in a system is just psychological warfare) , it`s about the cloakers wanting it 100% risk free
|
baltec1
Antares Shipyards Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 08:38:00 -
[50]
Originally by: Vanzatoarea Edited by: Vanzatoarea on 18/08/2009 08:35:15 Edited by: Vanzatoarea on 18/08/2009 08:33:53
Originally by: Melissa Ravenflame The counter to a cloaker in 0.0 is to not 100% fit your ratting ship in 0.0 space for PvE. Instead, you have to trade off being as efficient a ratter as possible against having some kind of PvP defence/offence. You also have to watch local / overview and not go afk yourself.
If you want to be able to rat in peace with a 100% PvE fit with 'almost' no chance of being attacked then join an NPC corp and go to Empire. Otherwise, you have to accept that 0.0 can be an unpleasant place and you have to fit accordingly.
Oh the arogance is strong within this one!
How about this : Make cloaked ships probable somehow , then the cloaker will allso taste the dark dangerous 0.0 . As it is now , you need to be a total idiot to lose a cloaked t2 cruiser hull (recon , hac) to any sort of rating BS . Your entire argument is irrelevant
The thing is not the raters who want to rat in peace (those just fit cloaks themselves you know.....) , the issue is the people who find it right to be in 0.0 without any risk whatsoever to themselves
So please understand the argument , you`re geting it all wrong : It`s not the locals terified by the cloakers asking for safety (though that`s what you like to think , after all cloak an alt in a system is just psychological warfare) , it`s about the cloakers wanting it 100% risk free
edit : removing local in 0.0 will , as it is now, efectively stop all rating in most of 0.0 , because it would no longer be nearly as profitable as highsec l4 whoring . And yes we all know how many people rat for fun , those would still rat i supose
It wont stop me from ratting, but then, I also aready spam the scanner.
|
|
Vanzatoarea
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 08:56:00 -
[51]
it wont stop me from rating either , except it will cut down my isk -making to a point where i would be better off with a domi alt afk`missioning in empire
Scaner spaming , pvp fited hacs instead of bs`s , all can work fine i supose , the issue remains : in order for0.0 rating to be at least on par isk-wise with l4`s you need dedicated ships , pve fits , and the ability to properly chain a system . Else you end up with a lousy 20m/hour for your trouble .
Personaly , i`d rather hang cloaked in someone`s yard while watching a movie :P
|
Rordan D'Kherr
Amarr
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 09:42:00 -
[52]
I guess this thread is addressed to me.
I love being 23/7 cloaked in a system.
That's the way I play EVE. I am a voyer. I like that. I payed for a cloaking device because I want to be hidden.
Sometimes I am AFK...
vOv
If you would turn a cloaking device into a non-operational item, I would be very sad.
|
Ervol Libra
Amarr Pinky and the Brain corp
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 09:48:00 -
[53]
0/10 bad troll
btw if they are cloaked they cant hurt ya |
Mara Rinn
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 10:38:00 -
[54]
Originally by: Vanzatoarea ... it`s about the cloakers wanting it 100% risk free
There are risks associated with even having a cloaking device fitted to your ship: slower locking times, the inability to start locking for some time after you've decloaked, and you're visible in the local channel.
The counters to cloaking are: bubbles, interceptors, smartbombs, or just plain trawling space looking for that cloaked mothership that was aligned with that planet over there.
[Aussie players: join channel ANZAC] |
Maitscho Long
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 10:41:00 -
[55]
op is wrong with his title needs to be 23/7 (except long downtimes)!
|
Lord WarATron
Amarr Shadow Warri0rs
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 10:56:00 -
[56]
Edited by: Lord WarATron on 18/08/2009 10:59:31 Its a fun tactic. Couple of folks in combat recons with cov ops cloak (hence no penalties) can lock down a system. Its great fun shutting down systems etc, while you are watching tv or whatever.
If anything, perhaps something needs to happen with 0.0 ratting. Its too risk free for people who use a sound alarmbot. What is needed is that if you want the 0.0 isk, you gotta take the 0.0 risk. Want a spawn? Then commit to it by having all rats scramble.
Then and only then, can you complain about cloakers. I mean, how else we gonna get targets if they can warp out 30sec-1min before you land at their belt? If you cannot get targets, then deny them playing.
--
Billion Isk Mission |
Lifelongnoob
Caldari Final Conflict UK
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 11:09:00 -
[57]
Edited by: Lifelongnoob on 18/08/2009 11:09:40 u have a perfectly good countermeasures to cloakers
cos they are paper thin and die easily
they cannot do anything except give intel while they are cloaked
drones & close proximity can decloak them
smartbombs decloak them.
afk cloakers are even more useless as they are not even giving intel if they are afk
so stop crying about cloakers they are fine as they are
|
Doomed Predator
The Graduates Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 11:10:00 -
[58]
Maybe grow some balls, it's not like recons or bombers are solowtfpwn mobiles. The 'Fendahlian Collective' strikes again |
Sinuous Grace
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 11:24:00 -
[59]
I for one have never seen this topic raised ever before.
|
Rawr Cristina
Caldari Annihilate. Avarice.
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 11:34:00 -
[60]
Edited by: Rawr Cristina on 18/08/2009 11:34:36 It's pretty amusing how people complain that they can't be 100% safe all the time in the depths of lawless space
edit: IMO
- Malyutka (The Virus) - |
|
Rashmika Clavain
Gallente Aliastra
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 11:38:00 -
[61]
Originally by: Jeebus Cynoalt The obvious solution is to make a pve server.
Once it's made you should go there and leave the rest of us alone.
We already have a PVE server, you can find hte details here. Removed. Please keep your EVE signature related to your EVE persona and not that of a real life politician. Navigator |
Davina Braben
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 11:47:00 -
[62]
Edited by: Davina Braben on 18/08/2009 11:47:50 Silly nub. It's 23/7.
I agree with the OP though.
They should remove local so people like him don't have to worry.
|
MatrixSkye Mk2
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 11:57:00 -
[63]
Edited by: MatrixSkye Mk2 on 18/08/2009 12:05:35 ima a carebear and the only way i can rat in 0.0 is by sometimes having to cloak and go afk to p1ss off the pirates . so no. leave cloaking as is thank you very much. i dont bother anyone. and my battleship is already weak as it is. sadly, the only real thing worth fitting on a ratting raven is a cloak.
WORKING AS INTENDED!!!!!!!
|
Robert Caldera
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 11:58:00 -
[64]
Originally by: red dwarrf Why hasn't CCP addressed this yet? There is no counter measure to someone AFK cloaking a system for days except to decloak once a day for a kill. There should be a counter measure!!!
troll
cloaking is already a countermeasure against getting found and ganked.
|
Mr Flibblle
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 14:10:00 -
[65]
I was not even referring to RATTING. And how do you fit a Hulk to protect against a cloaked PVP ship? What I was asking was why there is NO COUNTERMEASURE. There is a counter measure to everything in this game except cloaking, whether it's AFK or not. THose of you that practice this will of course not see the point I am trying to discuss; rather you will resort to the same ol' drivel of "go back to hisec" or whetever your current mantra is. Try to STAY ON TOPIC. It is a discussion about COUNTERMEASURES. No trolling, I am a 0.0 resident, I rat sometimes, and when I do I fit my ship for enemies, but it's not possible to fit a Hulk for PVP and keep the perma-tank. And NO, I will not go back to hisec. 0.0 is more exciting, and yes, I have lost ships but thats the price you pay. Please, folks, if you have nothing to offer on the subject, go flame someone else.
|
Izztyrr Maemtor
Caldari
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 14:11:00 -
[66]
Cloaking is fine the way it is now. What needs to be fixed is the whiners.
|
Tippia
Raddick Explorations
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 14:12:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Mr Flibblle What I was asking was why there is NO COUNTERMEASURE.
And what we are asking is why do you need one? ——— “If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡… you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.” — Karath Piki |
Vanzatoarea
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 14:13:00 -
[68]
Edited by: Vanzatoarea on 18/08/2009 14:15:06
Originally by: Rawr Cristina Edited by: Rawr Cristina on 18/08/2009 11:34:36 It's pretty amusing how people complain that they can't be 100% safe all the time in the depths of lawless space
edit: IMO
you too get it all wrong mate
it`s the current form cloak defenders that want it 100% safe not the other way around
and as an above poster pointed....."its fun to lock down a system with a few cloakers"
sure for some may be...yet it`s still broken
|
Davina Braben
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 14:18:00 -
[69]
If a couple of non-blues in local can "lock down a system" for you then tbh you deserve to be stuck in POS/station.
|
Zeimanov Kalzumaan
Caldari Haruspex Industries
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 14:34:00 -
[70]
For cloakers to be able to affect the game, they need to uncloak - when that happens you deal with them the same as any ship.
You mentioned a hulk being unable to deal with cloakers - what would the hulk do if someone logged in to the system, warped and shot you up - cloaks being out of the game wouldn't help you.....
|
|
Cory Sopapilla
Minmatar Kiroshi Group Exiliar Syndicate
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 14:36:00 -
[71]
Originally by: Mr Flibblle I was not even referring to RATTING. And how do you fit a Hulk to protect against a cloaked PVP ship? What I was asking was why there is NO COUNTERMEASURE. There is a counter measure to everything in this game except cloaking, whether it's AFK or not.
No offense, but I think it's just you and maybe a handful of others who actually want this. It's been discussed to death in many threads. The countermeasure is to get within 2500m of them and they will decloak.
The real issue is local. You're obviously using it as a scanner to find cloaked ships and it really shouldn't be an auto-refreshing security status/standing/pilot probe.
As for fitting a hulk to protect against a cloaked pvp ship, unless they are already in the belt with you or in a covert ops, they have to uncloak to warp to you or at least to target you and fire.
Also, it's not always about you. They're probably there for recon or it might just be a macro miner who keeps cloaking every time you show up.
|
|
CCP Zymurgist
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.08.18 15:47:00 -
[72]
Thread locked Ranting and Spam.
Now if you will excuse me, my cloaked Orca is floating off to the left slightly.
Zymurgist Community Representative CCP Hf, EVE Online Contact us |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |