Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 62 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ze Killer
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 02:43:00 -
[1411]
/signed
|
hesameno
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 06:28:00 -
[1412]
/signed, stuff is like SOOOOOO lame!
|
MirrorGod
Heretic Army
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 06:52:00 -
[1413]
Edited by: MirrorGod on 06/09/2009 06:52:33 Edited by: MirrorGod on 06/09/2009 06:52:25 hey, CCP...
KNOCK THAT **** OFF
|
Rei Toai
Faaip De Oiad
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 13:53:00 -
[1414]
does the CSM recognize this problem?? __________________________________
I don't want to talk about it I don't want to talk about it I don't want to talk about it I don't want to know. |
RedSplat
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 14:36:00 -
[1415]
Scantimer is an intentional attempt to gimp PvP?
Try jumping into a 0.0 system you know is likely to have ratters in; or miners!
Now try and D-Scan all the belts as fast as you can BEFORE the victim using imba omniscient local to protect them decides to warp out.
Wait, whats this....
You can scan again until 'x' ammount of time has passed.
If Local was Delayed in 0.0 and Lowsec this would not be an issue.
But it isnt.
Scrap this idiotic change.
Originally by: CCP Mitnal
I don't sleep. I am always here. Watching. Waiting.
Originally by: CCP Mitnal it does get progressively longer.
|
UFOPOCKET
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 18:35:00 -
[1416]
!sup
|
AKIRA RTF
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 19:32:00 -
[1417]
+1!
|
WarGod
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 19:38:00 -
[1418]
This just in!
The new EVE trailer (that can be found here - http://www.eveonline.com/download/videos/Default.asp?a=download&vid=230) should be edited to say 'the miner that was being pirated died because you couldn't scan it down quick enough.
That is all!
|
Arcturus Io
Shade. Cry Havoc.
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 20:37:00 -
[1419]
Seriously need some dev input on this matter.
That and Ive never had the chance to say 'Page 50 sniper!'
|
Zeminy
The Knights Templar R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 20:58:00 -
[1420]
In full support ... give me back my scanner!!
~ * ~
~ * ~ |
|
Sveminir Trpimirovic
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 21:02:00 -
[1421]
Supported
|
GutsyGecko
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 21:59:00 -
[1422]
fix it CCP!
|
X3k5
The Knights Templar R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 22:06:00 -
[1423]
Edited by: X3k5 on 06/09/2009 22:05:59 /signed
|
lIjii
The Knights Templar R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 22:42:00 -
[1424]
=]
|
Viva Darkness
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 22:44:00 -
[1425]
lol, now every PvPer or alike will support this, and someone who contribute from the delay - will not
|
Virak'kara
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 23:04:00 -
[1426]
/signed
|
Isaac Starstriker
Amarr Smegnet Incorporated Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2009.09.07 00:45:00 -
[1427]
At first, I was highly annoyed with this change as I had been in Wormholes before I moved to 0.0 and I realized what kind of nerf this was.
Then, I went and watched a certain PVP movie and realized WHY this was nerfed.
Said movie showed first a Rifter and then a Typhoon engaging in some very interesting low/null-sec combats. I realized though that as they moved in to attack a player, the person controlling the ship would be constantly jamming the button to scan almost nonstop. This, to me, seemed like the reason CCP Nerfed it. I can imagine there would be some server-based performance issues with someone constantly jamming said button to scan the area. Also, it puts in a tad more risk to those who attack targets just as much as those who are getting attacked.
Is this nerf too much? Maybe Did CCP need to nerf the constant hitting of the scan button? Yes Did CCP need to make a stupid message that annoys the crap out of anyone? No Will this affect me? No. (Since I didn't hit the button every .001secs) Should it be unnerfed slightly? Again, maybe. It seems that CCP has decided it should be 2 seconds. I'm more of the opinion it should be 1.0-1.5 seconds per calibration.
Thus, no support for this.
--Isaac
Isaac's Haul*Mart - Closed
|
VALentuSYS
|
Posted - 2009.09.07 00:54:00 -
[1428]
signed
|
PhantomVoice
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.09.07 00:54:00 -
[1429]
|
JesDarkJewel
|
Posted - 2009.09.07 02:54:00 -
[1430]
not signed
You have Owerview for Fast information, Scanner is slow information.
|
|
Ather Ialeas
the united Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2009.09.07 04:03:00 -
[1431]
Yet another nerf that makes solo/small gang pvp more difficult. Guerilla warfare and other quick strikes when outnumbered require up to date scan information and seconds count. If CCP is making this sort of ridiculous change then they might as well nerf every ship's warp speed.
PvP is what makes Eve fun, and the scanner's previous function significantly aided in one's ability to counter big blobs and catch stragglers. (Thinking this way, it's just another step towards fighting blob with blob, and doesn't flooding a system with people cause MORE lag than simply clicking the scanner?!)
Come up with a better solution!
|
Calchura Daria
The Knights Templar R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2009.09.07 05:00:00 -
[1432]
Bring back the old scanner!
At the very least shorten the delay.
|
XOLLOPYP
|
Posted - 2009.09.07 05:05:00 -
[1433]
\signed
|
Crotch Goblin
|
Posted - 2009.09.07 05:23:00 -
[1434]
fix stuff
|
Skorgan Shard
Mad Jester Mining
|
Posted - 2009.09.07 07:11:00 -
[1435]
|
hEtt
the united Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2009.09.07 08:33:00 -
[1436]
Edited by: hEtt on 07/09/2009 08:33:37 Signed and also, it would be nice to have an autoscan option.
|
Thingymawotzit
|
Posted - 2009.09.07 09:19:00 -
[1437]
my full support.
Bring back button spamming
|
Orta Moon
|
Posted - 2009.09.07 09:33:00 -
[1438]
:up:
If there's a macro problem, the solution is not to wreck a major game for the normal players.
|
Ariorios
|
Posted - 2009.09.07 10:31:00 -
[1439]
2 seconds are too long!
|
Symlin Raahn
Killer Koalas R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2009.09.07 11:00:00 -
[1440]
Edited by: Symlin Raahn on 07/09/2009 11:00:23 support ттт ттт ттт ттт ттт ттт т Growing old is mandatory. т Growing up is optional.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 62 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |