Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Arres Everdark
|
Posted - 2009.08.25 01:37:00 -
[1]
So I found out there are 3 wiki-like sites about EVE Online:
Can you guys comment about them? Maybe tell me which ones you like the most, about the article qualities, etc.
Thanks.
|
Quantar Raalsken
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.08.25 03:02:00 -
[2]
i personally like Evelopedia the best cause it feels a lot like the market when ur looking up modules and it has lots of little guides
my one gripe with it is these guides are nigh impossible to find because the search engine finds EVERYTHING with ur keywords in it =======
|
Sir Substance
Minmatar MagiTech Alliance Inc. MagiTech Corp
|
Posted - 2009.08.25 03:39:00 -
[3]
i tried to keep eve-wiki up to date at one point, but gave up about a year ago due to lack of help from other people. ------ I, for one, welcome our new console overlords! |
Lana Torrin
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
|
Posted - 2009.08.25 03:41:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Sir Substance i tried to keep eve-wiki up to date at one point, but gave up about a year ago due to lack of help from other people.
About a year ago.. so thats about the time I stopped doing it for the same reason then... I swear that site only ever has 1 person updating it at a time.
|
Zurrar
Gallente Epiphyte Mining and Exploration Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2009.08.25 03:51:00 -
[5]
i HATE the new eve wiki....
i want the old one back.
|
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation
|
Posted - 2009.08.25 04:09:00 -
[6]
Evelopedia is my favorite and its not just because i contributed quite a few exploration articles. --------------------------
WTB a sig, or moderation of my sig by all the hot CCP girls. |
Arres Everdark
|
Posted - 2009.08.26 07:05:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Lana Torrin
Originally by: Sir Substance i tried to keep eve-wiki up to date at one point, but gave up about a year ago due to lack of help from other people.
About a year ago.. so thats about the time I stopped doing it for the same reason then... I swear that site only ever has 1 person updating it at a time.
Well even with the originial Wikipedia, only like 3% of the viewers actually contribute *something* to the article (whether it was good or not), and of the 3%, only like 10% of the "contributers" actually wrote more than a sentence (as oppose to correcting the spelling of 2 words, adding spams or misinformation, etc.)
So that means only 0.3% of all users contribute useful information to Wikipedia[citation needed].
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |