Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tom Selek
|
Posted - 2009.09.04 16:41:00 -
[1]
Boring Friday and I was wondering how many Meta 4 items better than their Meta 5 versions (excluding cost, just comparing fittings & bonuses).
I'll start with Rolled Tungsten Plates I > Steel Plates II All ECM Meta 4 > ECM Meta 5
You guys and gals have any others?
|
Lubomir Penev
Dark Nexxus
|
Posted - 2009.09.04 16:57:00 -
[2]
All ECCM, same sensor strength boost, less CPU, less cap use. -- 081014 : emoragequit, char transfered to a friend, 090317 : back to original owner blog |
Siigari Kitawa
Gallente The Aduro Protocol
|
Posted - 2009.09.04 17:04:00 -
[3]
F-90 vs SeBo II, 2 less CPU.
|
Doomed Predator
The Graduates Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2009.09.04 17:16:00 -
[4]
Named 100MN MWD(meta 4) > T2 100 MN MWD(meta 5) ,screw the -25% shield penalty
meta 4 damage mods> meta 5 damage mods ,less cpu The 'Fendahlian Collective' strikes again |
Vasundhara
|
Posted - 2009.09.04 17:20:00 -
[5]
Beta Reactor Control: Capacitor Power Relay I 3 CPU Shield Boost Bonus -10%
--- Is Better Than ---
Capacitor Power Relay II 8 CPU Shield Boost Bonus -11%
Same cap recharge bonus
|
DeFtron
Gallente Cooperative Freelance Navigators Association Psychotic Tendencies.
|
Posted - 2009.09.04 17:22:00 -
[6]
Edited by: DeFtron on 04/09/2009 17:24:27 Edited by: DeFtron on 04/09/2009 17:23:02 PWNAGE Target Painter > Target Painter II (fitting, cap usage) Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler > Warp Scrambler II (fitting, cap usage) Phased Muon Sensor Disruptor > Sensor Dampener II (huge difference in fitting reqs and cap usage) Diminishing Power System Drain > Nosferatu II (huge difference in fitting reqs) Unstable Power Fluctuators > Energy Neutralizers II(huge difference in fitting reqs)
Edit: spelling Edit II: i must be tired today
|
Cmndr Griff
Capitalistic Tendencies Red Dwarf Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.09.04 17:22:00 -
[7]
* Balmer Series TD has lower CPU requirements, same amount of disruption and lower activation cost.
* Best named web and scrambler have lower fitting as well for the same effectiveness as T2 with lower activation costs.
* Same story for the best named Target painter and sensor dampener.
There are more out there but those are from memory.
|
Tom Selek
|
Posted - 2009.09.04 17:27:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Tom Selek on 04/09/2009 17:28:06 nevermind.
|
K'uata Sayus
|
Posted - 2009.09.04 17:30:00 -
[9]
The Gold Standard - Module Wars - Best Named vs Tech II
This may be the definitive, exhaustive exploration of the subject.
EVERYONE SEEMS NORMAL UNTIL YOU GET TO KNOW THEM. |
Salpad
Carebears with Attitude
|
Posted - 2009.09.04 17:42:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Tom Selek Boring Friday and I was wondering how many Meta 4 items better than their Meta 5 versions (excluding cost, just comparing fittings & bonuses).
I archived this link some time ago: http://www.eve-tribune.com/index.php?no=3_16&page=1
-- Salpad C.E.O., Carebears with Attitude |
|
Mr Ignitious
R.E.C.O.N. Minor Threat.
|
Posted - 2009.09.04 17:57:00 -
[11]
Originally by: K'uata Sayus The Gold Standard - Module Wars - Best Named vs Tech II
This may be the definitive, exhaustive exploration of the subject.
out dated - MWD's all have same speed bonus now a days... damn nano nerf.
I read the forums assuming there are no trolls, only really stupid people.
Originally by: CCP Zulupark
WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU?
|
Guillame Herschel
Gallente NME1
|
Posted - 2009.09.04 22:08:00 -
[12]
Originally by: DeFtron
Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler > Warp Scrambler II (fitting, cap usage)
But not range. Meta 4 = 7.5km, Meta 5 = 9km
-- The crazy tree blooms at every moment of liberal ascendancy.
|
Ulasim
Child Head Injury and Laceration Doctors
|
Posted - 2009.09.04 23:13:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Ulasim on 04/09/2009 23:13:40
Originally by: Doomed Predator Named 100MN MWD(meta 4) > T2 100 MN MWD(meta 5) ,screw the -25% shield penalty
meta 4 damage mods> meta 5 damage mods ,less cpu
lol shield penalty riigghhhtttt and meta 4 damage mods have a 0.02 lower damage mod then T2
Originally by: Guillame Herschel
Originally by: DeFtron
Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler > Warp Scrambler II (fitting, cap usage)
But not range. Meta 4 = 7.5km, Meta 5 = 9km
Also wrong, scram range increases with meta lvl4, a faint has 9km range
|
Sith LordX
|
Posted - 2009.09.05 01:57:00 -
[14]
Edited by: Sith LordX on 05/09/2009 01:57:05 The difference is in price. T2 is cheaper then T1 meta 4 items.
|
Lance Fighter
Amarr
|
Posted - 2009.09.05 02:12:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Guillame Herschel
Originally by: DeFtron
Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler > Warp Scrambler II (fitting, cap usage)
But not range. Meta 4 = 7.5km, Meta 5 = 9km
not true, look again
|
Ronin Reborn
Wrath of Fenris Gentlemen's Club
|
Posted - 2009.09.05 04:26:00 -
[16]
Flat out better due to fitting or cap use
Pwnage Painter > TP II Balmer TD > TD II Phased Muon > SD II 'Named' ECM > ECM II Phased Muon Projected ECCM II > Projected ECCM II Named ECCM > ECCM II Fleeting Web > Web II 'Solace' RR > RR II S95a Shield Transporters > ST II Local Hull Mods > Respective Hull Mods II Beta SPR > SPR II Beta CPR > CPR II
|
AtheistOfDoom
Amarr The Athiest Syndicate
|
Posted - 2009.09.05 05:24:00 -
[17]
Edited by: AtheistOfDoom on 05/09/2009 05:25:09
Originally by: Doomed Predator
meta 4 damage mods> meta 5 damage mods ,less cpu
Wrong. t2 >>>>> meta 4 damage mods. less cpu, more damage.
Quote:
Local Hull Mods > Respective Hull Mods II
Not always.
Originally by: Chribba
|
Lunewraith
Amarr Ministry of War
|
Posted - 2009.09.05 12:57:00 -
[18]
Good thread, bookmarked. Should almost be stickied.
|
Saulc Neslo
|
Posted - 2009.09.05 18:52:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Ronin Reborn
'Solace' RR > RR II
The T2 has shorter cycle time. If you can fit a T2 LRAR and handle the extra cap usage its better than the solace.
|
Lubomir Penev
Dark Nexxus
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 19:14:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Siigari Kitawa F-90 vs SeBo II, 2 less CPU.
Sensor Booster II use less cap/s. So if you can fit it you should fit it. -- 081014 : emoragequit, char transfered to a friend, 090317 : back to original owner blog |
|
Ecky X
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 19:52:00 -
[21]
Most plates, best named is the same armor as T2, with less mass penalty, less cpu, and less grid.
|
Dristra
Amarr Idle Haven
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 22:14:00 -
[22]
You do know that bringing light to this issue will lead ccp to nerf meta items, not boost tech II, right?
|
Gawain Hill
|
Posted - 2009.09.06 22:25:00 -
[23]
since when was the meta level anything more than a vague but inaccurate extimation of how good something is?
meta 0 to 3 not very good meta 4 better than meta 5 but being the best named item means it's very expensive so meta 5 ( i hate that lets call it T2 here from now on) so T2 is cheaper option although it might be more difficult to fit.
The only notable exception to T2 being better than best named is in weapons when ALL T2 weapons are better than best named guns thanks to the incresed damage.
best named items = very expensive easy to fit T2 items = dirt cheap difficult to fit longer to skill for much greateer supply
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |