Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Michwich
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:36:00 -
[1]
So I come back to my Bestower to see my pod instead floating nearby a stargate in Jita.
Thats enough CCP. If I cant AFK in high sec with a measly 150million worth in cargo youre not getting my money anymore. Sorry. Bye.
|
brutoid
Caldari
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:37:00 -
[2]
Can i has........
|
Demolishar
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:37:00 -
[3]
Damn.
I just suicide ganked a guy, but you're not him. :(
|
Mashie Saldana
BFG Tech
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:37:00 -
[4]
Can I have your stuff?
Oh it exploded, never mind.
|
Wang LeeMei
United Kings DEFI4NT
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:37:00 -
[5]
can i haz ... oh wait....
if u got 150m in ur cargo and just know a small lil tiny bit bout eve you wouldnt be hanging afk on gates near jita lol
fly safe
|
Hot Fudge
Minmatar Sweet -N- Sticky
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:40:00 -
[6]
My troll-o-meter is going off. Other than that, do something about it. It is what your kill rights are for. =========================
Sweet, sticky, and bad for your health. |
Danton Marcellus
Nebula Rasa Holdings
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:40:00 -
[7]
You've quit how many times now?
Go away!
Should/would/could have, HAVE you chav!
Also Known As |
Michwich
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:41:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Michwich on 02/11/2009 19:41:15 Edited by: Michwich on 02/11/2009 19:41:02
Originally by: Wang LeeMei can i haz ... oh wait....
if u got 150m in ur cargo and just know a small lil tiny bit bout eve you wouldnt be hanging afk on gates near jita lol
fly safe
Thats the point, I didnt know that 150 million was suicide ganking profitable in high security space. I didnt know crime was this easy in this game. I was wrong but now I know and its unacceptable.
|
Glopan Sowdah
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:41:00 -
[9]
Try not to AFK with your wallet at the electronics counter while you're shopping for a new game.
|
Kewso
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:44:00 -
[10]
I find it much safer to afk while docked...
course nobody ever thinks of that
|
|
Kweel Nakashyn
shadow and cloaking Mordus Angels
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:48:00 -
[11]
First golden rule of Eve : "Do not fly in a ship you can't afford to loose" Second (new) golden rule of Eve : "Don't cry there or people will laught at you" ~ Beer > Eve ? Eve > Beer ? |
Zartanic
Red Federation
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:49:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Michwich So I come back to my Bestower to see my pod instead floating nearby a stargate in Jita.
Thats enough CCP. If I cant AFK in high sec with a measly 150million worth in cargo youre not getting my money anymore. Sorry. Bye.
Michwich, you still haven't given me your stuff from the last 5 quits you did. You can make that up now if you want:)
|
Benco97
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:49:00 -
[13]
What was he in and what did you drop?
Originally by: P'uck
You're a DUMBASS - bold italic underline at the VERY LEAST.
|
Southern Suzy
Minmatar Brutor tribe
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:52:00 -
[14]
I can't believe you all fell for it he just gained 5 points, anyways still
-5/10 Poor trolling attempt So wait this is the end of my post allready?
I'm not in multiple alliances to spy! I'm in them so I'll always be on the winning team |
Krem daBrut
Marquie-X Corp
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:54:00 -
[15]
What about the most important question in this case, what happend to the slavage of his Bestower wreck ? Was it stolen ?
|
Michwich
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:56:00 -
[16]
Well if anyone wants my stuff you can just send me your isk and ill send you double back. That would be the fastest way to do it.
I just thought this game was supposed to be challenging. Its dissappoiting to see that certain play styles have it easier to profit than others. In short the games not balanced in this regard. 150 million in cargo should not be a profitable venture to play suicide attack ganker. Suicide attack should cost more. Surley no one could rationaly justify it being this easy? Is 150 million that rich? Well I guess Ive reached the end game it seems.
|
Br41n
Amarr Pinky and the Brain corp
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:57:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Krem daBrut What about the most important question in this case, what happend to the slavage of his Bestower wreck ? Was it stolen ?
I haz ninja zalvaged his wreck! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Pinky: Gee, Brain. What are we going to do tonight?
Brain: The same thing we do every night, Pinky. Try to take over the world. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
blulululu
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 19:59:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Michwich Edited by: Michwich on 02/11/2009 19:57:07 Edited by: Michwich on 02/11/2009 19:56:27 Well if anyone wants my stuff you can just send me your isk and ill send you double back. That would be the fastest way to do it.
I just thought this game was supposed to be challenging. Its dissappoiting to see that certain play styles have it easier to profit than others. In short the games not balanced in this regard. 150 million in cargo should not be a profitable venture to play suicide attack ganker in high security? what? Suicide attack should cost a lot more. Surley no one could rationaly justify it being this easy? Is 150 million that rich? Well I guess Ive reached the end game if that the case.
If you fly that around in an untanked ship someone can kill with a t1 cruiser before concord is around, yes you make it profitable and it is your own fault. I think EVE is not the game for you go play an MMO where you can not lose stuff.
|
Draeklore
Unknown-Entity Maru Ka'ge
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 20:01:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Michwich So I come back to my Bestower to see my pod instead floating nearby a stargate in Jita.
Thats enough CCP. If I cant AFK in high sec with a measly 150million worth in cargo youre not getting my money anymore. Sorry. Bye.
Obvious troll is obvious.
|
Michwich
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 20:01:00 -
[20]
Originally by: blulululu
Originally by: Michwich Edited by: Michwich on 02/11/2009 19:57:07 Edited by: Michwich on 02/11/2009 19:56:27 Well if anyone wants my stuff you can just send me your isk and ill send you double back. That would be the fastest way to do it.
I just thought this game was supposed to be challenging. Its dissappoiting to see that certain play styles have it easier to profit than others. In short the games not balanced in this regard. 150 million in cargo should not be a profitable venture to play suicide attack ganker in high security? what? Suicide attack should cost a lot more. Surley no one could rationaly justify it being this easy? Is 150 million that rich? Well I guess Ive reached the end game if that the case.
If you fly that around in an untanked ship someone can kill with a t1 cruiser before concord is around, yes you make it profitable and it is your own fault. I think EVE is not the game for you go play an MMO where you can not lose stuff.
Im not blaming the gankers. Im blaming CCP design decision to allow such reward for no risk. Remember a suicide gank is calculated profit. Theres no risk involved once the numbers meet the right criteria. The point of this thread is that CCP has the numbers wrong. And until they get it right, I cant justify playing a game this flawed.
|
|
Wendi Watson
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 20:04:00 -
[21]
Another Michwich whine/troll thread? Haven't you quit already?
-10/10 |
Nooto
Caldari Dragon Clan Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 20:04:00 -
[22]
bye bye. cya. can i have your stuff? BEWARE!!!
All text above this sig represents my personal opinion. This in no way reflects the views of my corporation or alliance |
Tippia
Raddick Explorations
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 20:07:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Michwich Im not blaming the gankers. Im blaming CCP design decision to allow such reward for no risk
That's just it: CCP didn't do that — you did. You allowed for that reward. You reduced their risk.
Start looking there before you assign blame elsewhere. ——— “If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡… you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.” — Karath Piki |
Dragonwell
Tactical Trading Partnership
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 20:11:00 -
[24]
I'm completely at a loss for words on this one. I'm giving the benefit of the doubt to the OP and assuming he's not a troll.
How many times have we seen threads like this? How many people have cried that their **** got asploded on some high-sec gate that's supposed to represent an area where you're totally untouchable? How many times have people said "Don't AP in highsec" or "don't AFK undocked" or things to this effect?
Concerning the idea that "crime is too easy"... crime is crime, there are consequences, but the rewards of that crime outweighed those consequences. Big deal. People commit crimes in RL knowing full well what the consequences are and they're (nine times out of ten) willing to live with that for whatever reason. It's no different in EVE.
I'm now going to split the atoms of the dead horse which has been beat into its said component atoms at this point and ask "Why were you APing in high-sec?" "Why were you AFK at a gate?" "Why weren't you flying something that might have been able to withstand the attack or otherwise present to tough a target to be worth shooting?" "Why do you assume that because you were in high-sec no one should have been able to touch you?" etc.
As an aside, 150m is not much at all. A "measly" 150m shouldn't be enough to make you quit. Or wasn't it so measly and it was all you had, thus making your mistake carry that much more force? *** Awake in a Space-Dye Vest Struggling with Six Degrees of Inner Turbulence Falling Into Infinity toward a New Millennium While trapped inside this Octavarium. |
Kariva
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 20:12:00 -
[25]
What is f.. now : 1. Insurance 2. High sec not high...
1. Will the insurance company pay you for the destroyed car if you robe the bank and crash that car on police blockade ??? WHERE is th LOGIC CCP ? The insurance should be payed out only if you got destroyed by non player ship. or be a victime of a (concord crime). Why the insurance is payed out if you on war. What company would not bankrupt in time of war where the destruction of ship is very very likely .... Again CCP change the logic of insurance, and crime.... Who will go to low null sec if they are eaven not safe at high sec... 2. Read 1....
|
Janus Duo
Gallente Down In Flames
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 20:14:00 -
[26]
150mil is is a lot of money and not something you wouldn't carry around in something much more heavily protected than a T1 indy. You may try to disagree with me but you're the one ragequitting over a matter of 150mil ISK, you obviously valued it highly.
|
Bud Johnson
Broski Enterprises
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 20:15:00 -
[27]
I knew i had seen that name before. If you cant learn from your mistakes (or at least not react to them like a child) then eve probably isn't the game for you.
|
Michwich
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 20:16:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Tippia
Originally by: Michwich Im not blaming the gankers. Im blaming CCP design decision to allow such reward for no risk
That's just it: CCP didn't do that ù you did. You allowed for that reward. You reduced their risk.
Start looking there before you assign blame elsewhere.
So tell us, wheres the risk sitting at a gate scanning for a profitable suicide gank? Why isnt this done in null sec? Thats right. The weakest link. Concord. The only thing thats there to protect high security is a brain dead AI bot easily predicatable and as such we have protitable suicide attacks. Suicide attacks should never be profitable. The notion that loosing makes you win is called broken and therefore an exploit in my PVP eyes. No one can argue otherwise. No one. Not even CCP.
|
Neliel Soifon
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 20:17:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Michwich So I come back to my Bestower to see my pod instead floating nearby a stargate in Jita.
Thats enough CCP. If I cant AFK in high sec with a measly 150million worth in cargo youre not getting my money anymore. Sorry. Bye.
You fail, and it's 100% your fault. Have fun in the next lame mmo you'll play.
|
Lucjan
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 20:17:00 -
[30]
An Armageddon blew me up for my 8m in cargo...figure that one out : in Jita as well. I was in a Badger.
You should be able to take CONCORD to court though for being useless.
Can I have your assets?
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |