Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mister LEM0NS
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 04:48:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Mister LEM0NS on 10/01/2010 04:48:21
Yes so ive heard that nearly everyone wants a tech 2 drake... but what they havent thought of is what it can do, what it looks like, or what the bonuses would be like.
Some pictures of a model i have built
Sorry about the website... i put an old school project to use And on that note, yeah... i made model drakes!
Sparrow
Additions to the drake -Resists 5%EM 60%kin 50%THRM 70% EXP -8 launcher hardpoints and an additional 100 powergrid to support the one extra launcher. -1 more med slot -warp speed 4.0 -Battlecruiser bonus> 5% shield resists per level Command ship Bonus> 5% Heavy and Heavy assault missile damage and velocity and shield capacity per level -shield 7500 -armor 5000 (resists 60%EM 70%THERM 40%KIN 20% EXP) It would be like any t2 ship, not indestructable... but well near it. Other painjobs to be considered... Caldari navy, Guristas, Falcons camo. Before i get the flood of "i hate the drake go kill yourself" and "there already is a t2 drake, look at the nighthawk"
NO!!!! The people demand another drake! for gods sake dont go bashing what ive just posted... its an IDEA!!! get it through your heads! so just shutup and DEAL WITH IT!
|
Felfany
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 04:55:00 -
[2]
first in a troll post?
|
Mister LEM0NS
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 05:07:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Felfany first in a troll post?
Not trolling... thinking INSIDE the box! who needs the outside... work with what ya got!
|
AMF2
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 06:28:00 -
[4]
We already have a T2 Drake its called a Nighthawk. We also have a T2 Hurricane its the Sleipnir And the t2 Myrm is a Eos, and it and it sucks monkey****
|
yani dumyat
Minmatar Pixie Cats
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 06:52:00 -
[5]
funky models though :) _________________________________________________ Lifeboat ----> + Human |
Telvani
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 08:22:00 -
[6]
Your thread would be more credible if you had said "we need a T2 teir 2 Battlecruiser" just looking at one race is just ignorant. We already have them, I think CCP should just remodel the current command ships onto tier 2 hulls. The ship you designed has no real role other than 'better drake' ships need an actual role if they arnt to become (or make another ship) redudant. CCP also state ISK should never give you a ship that is just better, this seems to have no disadvantages to the drake. Nice models though |
Mister LEM0NS
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 16:28:00 -
[7]
Originally by: AMF2 We already have a T2 Drake its called a Nighthawk. We also have a T2 Hurricane its the Sleipnir And the t2 Myrm is a Eos, and it and it sucks monkey****
NO! i coulda swore i put that in my post... Every faction has the ship that looks great! (Myrmidon, hurricane, harbinger,Drake) and it has the other battlecruiser that looks like crap... (britix,cyclone,prophecy, nighthawk) nighthawk looks like a cadillac, it doesnt look good, all its says is *look! i have alot of money to buy ships that have no purpose!* if you want a tank, get a golem! And besides, the nighthawk only has 6 missile slots. THE WHOLE REASON THE PEOPLE DONT WANT TO BUY A NIGHTHAWK IS BECAUSE ITDOESNT LOOK LIKE A DRAKE! it looks like crap! The black and red paintjob doesnt help it either... So dont give me that bull that the nighhawk is the T2 drake... BECAUSE IT ISNT!
|
OldWolfe
The Last of the Renshai
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 17:23:00 -
[8]
Stop ragging on Lemon. He was just having fun contributing his thoughts to the EVE forum in a creative way. No way is it trolling or self-limiting himself to a linear thought process.
Nice looking Drake model by the way. If they do come out with a black drake, I will for sure cross train into Caldari just for that ship.
|
fuxinos
Caldari Guys 0f Sarcasm
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 17:32:00 -
[9]
That thing you propossed would be so overpowered :S
|
Hanwa
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 17:46:00 -
[10]
Cool models, the black drake looks quality.
What did you make them out of?
|
|
fuxinos
Caldari Guys 0f Sarcasm
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 17:52:00 -
[11]
As far as I can see, they are made out of wood, arent they?
|
Mister LEM0NS
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 17:56:00 -
[12]
"That thing you propossed would be so overpowered :S"
Yes it would be overpowered, a rival of the tengu. But isnt that what most t2 ships are? Take a look at the rook, Its tank is above what it should be. And naturaly, the drake is a ship that is capeable of fufiling almost any roll in eve.
"Cool models, the black drake looks quality.
What did you make them out of?"
The entire model is made out of balsa wood sheets and 1/4 balsawood sticks, held together by the work of a hot glue gun. Your gona need an exacto-knife too.
|
fuxinos
Caldari Guys 0f Sarcasm
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 17:59:00 -
[13]
Yay, was right :D
Anyway, I assume your pretty newish, but to get that stright, T2 ships are nowhere near indestructible.
Some tank ok, some not, but your propossal would be far above "tank ok".
|
Ran Khanon
Amarr Ministry of War
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 18:04:00 -
[14]
Edited by: Ran Khanon on 10/01/2010 18:04:36 Hehe, nice one mate. I just did some photoshopping with an Abaddon screenshot.
Behold, the HMS Nomnom, a Sharkadon and the first in an entirely new shipclass; Frig-devourers.
|
Mister LEM0NS
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 18:04:00 -
[15]
Originally by: fuxinos Yay, was right :D
Anyway, I assume your pretty newish, but to get that stright, T2 ships are nowhere near indestructible.
Some tank ok, some not, but your propossal would be far above "tank ok".
Im "newish" to tech 2 ships. From what ive heard, things like the rook, onyx, golem, widow, and nighthawk are amazing tankers. Tengu above all, but then again it is a t3 ship.The only t2 ship i have is a manticore which cant tank for crap (i know it isnt meant to either. Hit and run)
|
Zhilia Mann
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 19:24:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Mister LEM0NS The mighthawk isnt a t2 drake, its a t2 ferox, which looks like crap from the start! Every faction has the ship that looks great! (Myrmidon, hurricane, harbinger,Drake) and it has the other battlecruiser that looks like crap... (britix,cyclone,prophecy, nighthawk)
So many things wrong here....
First, to get things straight, many people -- myself included -- think the NH looks like pure awesome. Many others -- myself included -- think the Damnation (based on the prophecy hull) and even the Absolution (ditto) look wonderful. And hell, I end up taking a slight DPS hit just to take out a Phantasm over taking a Harb.
Let's not even get in to the Sleipneir (Cyclone hull) debate; I happen to think it too looks pure awesome.
Second then. Tier 2 BCs were introduced well after Tech 2 BCs (command ships). Many people have noted that the field commands might be better suited by role in their Tier 2 hulls (except the Myrm which would clearly map on to the EOS and still be crap).
Third, people have been itching for T2 versions of tier 2 BCs basically since the first person to realize that a Drake can damn nearly rival the NH in most situations wrt passive tank. Since then, people have also realized that an actual combat-fitted Drake is also ridiculously powerful and that the Harb has absolutely eclipsed the Prophecy. The 'Cane has done a number on the Cyclone as well. The Myrm would have easily overtaken the Brutix without the truly nasty nerf it got with the introduction of bandwidth.
So the problem here is that no one knows exactly what to do with the Tier 2 T2 hulls. Do we make them stupid-easy mission runners? No, Maurauders and NHs (and Drakes) do that just fine. Do we give them command link bonuses? No, obviously not, unless of course we get a new set of command links. Do we make them like big recons? Big logistics? Big stealth bombers? Anti-POS weapons?
And no one has answered that very well as of yet. And so we haven't gotten our tier 2 T2 BCs.
(And no, uberdrake is not the right answer here. The model looks cool though; I'll give you that.)
|
Xavier Maroquin
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 19:38:00 -
[17]
Did anyone else notice the designation on the Drake model, "NCC-1701"
|
Mister LEM0NS
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 21:01:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Xavier Maroquin Did anyone else notice the designation on the Drake model, "NCC-1701"
Yeah i like giving my ships numbers rather then names. It all started when i forst got a drake. What could i name it? Something that survives anywhere it goes. Hmm... THE ENTERPRISE! That thing got out of every battle it got into, and 1701 looked nice too. I think im the only person who doesnt name their best ship "nightmare" or "big daddy" or some crap like that. How origional... a scary name
|
Almighty Narshe
|
Posted - 2010.01.10 21:14:00 -
[19]
My drake is called 'Steely Glint'.
|
Draulin
Gallente Independent Faction
|
Posted - 2010.01.11 00:47:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Mister LEM0NS Edited by: Mister LEM0NS on 10/01/2010 17:59:23
Originally by: AMF2 We already have a T2 Drake its called a Nighthawk. We also have a T2 Hurricane its the Sleipnir And the t2 Myrm is a Eos, and it and it sucks monkey****
NO! i coulda swore i put that in my post... The mighthawk isnt a t2 drake, its a t2 ferox, which looks like crap from the start! Every faction has the ship that looks great! (Myrmidon, hurricane, harbinger,Drake) and it has the other battlecruiser that looks like crap... (britix,cyclone,prophecy, nighthawk) nighthawk looks like a cadillac, it doesnt look good, all its says is *look! i have alot of money to buy ships that have no purpose!* if you want a tank, get a golem! And besides, the nighthawk only has 6 missile slots. THE WHOLE REASON THE PEOPLE DONT WANT TO BUY A NIGHTHAWK IS BECAUSE ITDOESNT LOOK LIKE A DRAKE! it looks like crap! The black and red paintjob doesnt help it either... So dont give me that bull that the nighhawk is the T2 drake... BECAUSE IT ISNT!
Gotta be a troll. The Command Ships are T2 versions of the 2nd tier BCs, they just use the 1st tier BC hulls. |
|
zythyl
Gallente ANZAC ALLIANCE IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.01.11 00:52:00 -
[21]
"NCC-1701"
Nice.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |