Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
disasteur
Tellcomtec Incorporated. Preatoriani
173
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 13:22:00 -
[301] - Quote
Callidus Dux wrote:'http://community.eveonline.com' wrote:
Account Management downtime on Wednesday, June 27
The EVE Online Account Management will be taken offline and will be not available from 11:15 UTC to 12:15 UTC on Wednesday, June 27.
We apologize for any inconvenience due to this downtime.
[b] Update: The Account Management downtime had to be extended for an unknown amount of time due to unforseen problems.[/b]
Is CCP trying to stop the wave of unsubscription? *tease No just a joke. I do not know what you are working for the account management at this moment. You can do .. take your time you need but work exhaustive. I can only hope that no one from the UI Team is trying to "improve" the Account Management page.
they are probably trying to make it a unified inventory look a like |
Kim Blackstone
Booty hunter's
12
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 13:52:00 -
[302] - Quote
Still no fix for the LOL frame rate. And to make decent frame rate I have to drop settings to make my spaceships look like plastic toys. Can't believe just 2 days ago I could be on mostly high settings. Best part is, having open (static) windows actually is the biggest performance hit on frame rate... go figure how a 2D element is more graphic intensive than 3D spaceships.
So discouraged to play now, I just want to get off every time I log in. Makes me wonder why I'm paying these hard earned dollars for this crap. I came in thinking - hey TQ, supercomputer cluster on an MMO! These guys must know what they're doing; man I couldn't be further from the truth.
NEVER in any MMO I've played, consistently released unplayable patch versions, break things over and over again. Responded to critical problems so slowly. And these MMO were not run by 600 professionals, just by a few script kiddies who doesn't even get paid for their job. Their test server releases are better written than TQ releases. What a joke.
It just pains me to keep voting my money on lousy organizations like CCP. I can't believe I'm thinking of unsubing just after a few months in this MMO (making it the shortest). If things don't improve by the time my sub runs out... o7 it was a good run with you pilots. |
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
185
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 14:37:00 -
[303] - Quote
Zleon Leigh wrote:Lost a long time corp mate to game issues yesterday. As in - unsub. He finally had had enough of broken mechanics and fail patches. Gave away his stuff, unsubbed, and trashed the game off his pc.
There are consequences to poor quality and failure to listen to you customers.
Your friend doesn't have much patience. If you want instant gratification, go stimulate your genitals. EvE is Hard, deal with it. |
Wobbly Ron
LoneStar Industries Comatose Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 14:50:00 -
[304] - Quote
Dear CCP,
I want my money back.
I have given you a month to sort out the UI, and you have failed. I have over 2 months left on my sub (which I have cancelled) and want a refund for the outstanding game time.
Why did you introduce this mess in the first place (were there hundred of posts complaining about the "old" UI... NO!, are there now thousands of posts saying how poor the new UI is... YES! If it wasnt broken why try to fix it).
And now you add to the misery by dropping frames rates to the point it is almost unplayable on top of the lag created by the new UI
GIVE ME MY MONEY BACK |
Herucles
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 15:43:00 -
[305] - Quote
Any idea when the drop in framerate/lag issues are going to be fixed?
Thanks. |
Vultre9
Tweety Birds of Terror
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 15:53:00 -
[306] - Quote
Unified Inventory still sucks FYI!!!!! and why did you have to make the Reaper look like a tub toy, all the other rookie ships look good but you just had to trash that one didnt you? |
Chokichi Ozuwara
Royal One Piece Corporation Deadly Unknown
342
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 17:20:00 -
[307] - Quote
Don't you people read the patch notes? They fixed everything!
Sheesh. You guys are tough. You expect a game that runs well on the same hardware day to day and has an intuitive interface that maximizes the user experience for everyone including edge cases?
How dare you! How dare you ask for these things. It is times like these that I look at what the players do, not what the players say! Tears will be shed and pants will need to be changed all round. |
Lord Leftfield
The Society
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 17:32:00 -
[308] - Quote
Keep up the good work. Although don't stop working on the unified inventory!! |
Emmy Mnemonic
Entropy Extension Soldiers Of New Eve
8
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 18:07:00 -
[309] - Quote
After patch 1.1.2 today, when warping the star-background graphics seems "missaligned", i.e. the stars RGB-components are not aligned to the same spot, making me see 2-3 versions of the stars in the background in different colors (is that description understandable?!)
I'll try to find my old-fashioned 1980-ies 3D glasses and see if this might be a new 3D-effect implemented by CCP!
In that case: cool!
Otherwise: If it does not work with my cool old glasses, it makes me get a headache when warping, and makes me not want to warp. Not wanting to warp usually ends in getting popped in this game, so fix pls!! :-)
|
Penritha
Wheels of Industry
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 19:17:00 -
[310] - Quote
The eve newsletter which just landed in my inbox has a link to an Inferno satisfaction (LOL) survey.
I urge everybody to complete the survey and express your disgust at the travesty of programming that is the unified inventory. |
|
Callidus Dux
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
504
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 19:24:00 -
[311] - Quote
Penritha wrote:The eve newsletter which just landed in my inbox has a link to an Inferno satisfaction (LOL) survey.
I urge everybody to complete the survey and express your disgust at the travesty of programming that is the unified inventory.
Thank you very much for the information Penritha. In case that someone did NOT get these newsletter (like me):
Link to the Newsletter Link to the Survey I can't play EVE at present. Because of THIS: http://i50.tinypic.com/2ez1wz4.jpg |
Chokichi Ozuwara
Royal One Piece Corporation Deadly Unknown
343
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 19:50:00 -
[312] - Quote
Typical quality
http://i.imgur.com/yEven.png Tears will be shed and pants will need to be changed all round. |
Callidus Dux
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
504
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 20:05:00 -
[313] - Quote
/o\ Where is the QA-Police? I can't play EVE at present. Because of THIS: http://i50.tinypic.com/2ez1wz4.jpg |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
684
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 20:15:00 -
[314] - Quote
I don't think the rumored CCP QA staff actually exist. Or if they do I can't even imagine the state of what CCP puts out before it reaches them. |
Timbuck V
Confrerie de la Lumiere Confrerie de la Lumiere Alliance
14
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 20:23:00 -
[315] - Quote
I'm quite pleased to annonce that I've got two ships active . Domi+noctis active ( asset view ) Many thanks to CCP. Keep on the good work |
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
288
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 20:47:00 -
[316] - Quote
I like how they knock the user surveys for bias, but then frame the UI changes as 'enhancements' lol. Thats politician levels of dishonesty.
"Weve enhanced it to be slower, laggy, bloated, more work to use, inconsistent, non-customizable and best of all more mouse clicks. Because we know thats what you want even if you dont know it". |
Haifisch Zahne
HZ Corp
63
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 23:19:00 -
[317] - Quote
I did not see one question about my satisfaction.
Penritha wrote:The eve newsletter which just landed in my inbox has a link to an Inferno satisfaction (LOL) survey.
I urge everybody to complete the survey and express your disgust at the travesty of programming that is the unified inventory.
|
Haifisch Zahne
HZ Corp
63
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 23:34:00 -
[318] - Quote
I noticed that, and opted for it. Most obviously correct answer, given CCP's complete lack of interest in quality.
|
Captain Praxis
EVE University Ivy League
101
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 00:08:00 -
[319] - Quote
Survey completed and feedback sent, for what it's worth |
Raketefrau
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
17
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 02:27:00 -
[320] - Quote
I can't warp to zero, on multiple accounts.
Pick a moon -> warp to zero -> end up at 5000km.
Pick a moon -> warp to 70km -> end up at 5000km.
Kinda limits my current activities. |
|
Commander A9
East Khanid Trading Khanid Trade Syndicate
22
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 02:52:00 -
[321] - Quote
I think EVE is causing a memory leak.
Usually I run EVE at around half a gig. Now I and my colleagues are running EVE at beyond a gig or more, with a single client.
EVE seems to be causing my CPU usage to spike too... If CCP wants to make changes: -rollback to old inventory system (pre-Inferno) -enable ships wobbling in hangar view (pre-Captains Quarters) -add more missions (NPC fleet vs. NPC fleets that actually shoot) -stop "fixing" what isn't "broken" |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8254
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 04:32:00 -
[322] - Quote
Raketefrau wrote:I can't warp to zero, on multiple accounts.
Pick a moon -> warp to zero -> end up at 5000km.
Pick a moon -> warp to 70km -> end up at 5000km.
Kinda limits my current activities. Warping to zero on a celestial object has always put you in orbit at roughly that range. The GÇ£warp to nGÇ¥ just puts you n km away from the normal warp-in spot (which will be several thousand km away from the object itself). Presumably, that's where you want to be, so you don't dive head-first right into a mountainGǪ GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|
RawNec
T.R.I.A.D Defiant Legacy
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 06:03:00 -
[323] - Quote
Janet Patton wrote:I don't think anyone mentioned this yet, but the Minmatar frigates have grown over twice in size. For example the Rifter went from being 56m long to being 139m. Hence why the guns look smaller. While I always thought the guns where a little to big on some of the frigates. I think the scale at which some of the ships where increased was over done. Maybe the ships should be shrunk back down half way to about 100m long? I understand why they did this, because a lot of guns where clipping through the models, but it seems like it was over done a little. The guns seem to tiny and puny now and look weak.
Also I would like to add that I really like the new V3 skins the details. They look great. I like most of the new paint schemes. I know a lot of people don't like the new brown color for the ships. I think it should be explained that this may because it was so the detail would show and that we will be able to repaint or re-shade our ships in the future different colors. That might be why the ships had to be lighter then they use to be.
One of the hi slots has also been moved from the ship side to the wings. Why did you do that CCP? The new skin will look awesome in anyway even if one hi slot is covering the side of the ship. If you move back the hi slot to where it was and shrink the ship back to at least 100m you will get a frigate that everybody is expecting I think.
At the same time I donGÇÖt want to sound too critical. I think you have done a great job and I really love the game! Keep up the good work! But please listen to what we have said. The wolf is the number one ship! I would be glad if you find out some improvements about the things we have mentioned.
|
Kim Blackstone
Booty hunter's
16
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 06:07:00 -
[324] - Quote
Haifisch Zahne wrote:I noticed that, and opted for it. Most obviously correct answer, given CCP's complete lack of interest in quality.
Amazingly, the survey question was fixed when I did it just now.
|
Maul555
Nuts and Vindictive Remix Technologies
298
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 07:10:00 -
[325] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Yes, you added back some rclick items to open special bays.....
my orca is still missing all the right click options that where taken out. I am not sure about any other ships. |
disasteur
Tellcomtec Incorporated. Preatoriani
173
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 07:11:00 -
[326] - Quote
Kim Blackstone wrote:Haifisch Zahne wrote:I noticed that, and opted for it. Most obviously correct answer, given CCP's complete lack of interest in quality. Amazingly, the survey question was fixed when I did it just now.
i didnt even made it to the third question since i answered the second one i didnt played eve actively, i wonder why... hehehe |
Krystal Flores
Missions Mining and Mayhem Northern Coalition.
14
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 07:53:00 -
[327] - Quote
Maul555 wrote:Tippia wrote:Yes, you added back some rclick items to open special bays..... my orca is still missing all the right click options that where taken out. I am not sure about any other ships. Yep the removal from menus is a ''Enhancement'' and it happens for all ships. You didn't want all that ease of use anyways. |
|
CCP Atlas
C C P C C P Alliance
182
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 11:00:00 -
[328] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:I went out to do my PI and, due to the update, was pressed for time. I went as fast as I could and did not trigger the "please wait for paperwork" timer like normal. CCP, did you speed that up? Thanks!
Yes we did. I'm glad you like it. |
|
Angst IronShard
33
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 11:11:00 -
[329] - Quote
Unified inventory is always a way too laggy :/ |
Nehlewolf
Serenity Prime
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 12:24:00 -
[330] - Quote
I too support the doing away of the unified inventory; or at least an option to choose between that and the original.
Its a good concept; but reading through this thread I have to agree - it's laggy, buggy, and for a lot of veteran players down right inconvenient. In regards to UI organization, unified inventory is a good strategy and I understand a lot of work has been, is being, and will be done to it - Its much more comforting to be able to have separate windows open for different ships,hangers, bays, ect. ect. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |