Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Garkonite
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 21:05:00 -
[1]
Now im not one to complain, usually, but this needs to be addressed.
Something i think should be done for hostiles to log in cloak up and go afk for the rest of the day in someone elses sov space, yes it makes it a great tactic, but sov bills and sov space is for a reason now, and so should allow us to either probe them out like a perfect example of a no longer used module that would make this awesome was the system scanner array. which ccp has deemed unnecessary now and what this module could have done for instance is:
Enemy cloaker enters space, cloaks up goes afk
have a time period that allows them to be scanned out lets say 3 hours of cloaking then a module or something requiring sov can scan them out while they're cloaked.
3 hours go by
goto said module, scan said cloaker
warp in and remove unwanted personel from system.
part of dominion i believe was to make sovable space more secure aswell as enable possiblities for political shifting.
currently how it is:
enemy cloaker enters system.
enemy cloaker warps, cloaks goes afk while he/she has to work or go afk or what ever.
enemy cloaker comes home, desides to do a black ops hot drop, finds a vulnerable target, hot drops black ops fleet.
kills target
cloaks up again
all this and not one thing the defending team can do about it.
further more, as when cyno jamming and such was first brought in, yes long time ago, and then black ops and black ops cynos were brought in they could not access cyno jammed systems.
they changed it now that they are able to access jammed systems but capital ships are not.
this is 100% fine, but there needs to be something done to make defense in these situations of afk cloakers easier. this also will make sure pilots are always "active" or safe when goign aroung afk, and there for making them interact with the game more, in my mind this is a great idea and i wanted to bring it up.
|
Garkonite
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 21:25:00 -
[2]
To support my own topic aswell as add that this was recently brought to my attention
another fix would be a timer on the cloak module
|
Avoida
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 21:26:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Garkonite Now im not one to complain
And yet your entire post is that..one big complaint about a mechanism which utterly confounds you even though there are incredibly simple yet effective countermeasures.
Cloaking is fine.
|
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 21:28:00 -
[4]
not support. cloak is fine.
grow some balls and bait them. 0.0 carebears best carebear, and we got our weekly proof.
|
Verys
Burning Technologies Cult of War
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 21:39:00 -
[5]
What you just described here in great detail is a perfect example of guerilla warfare. I don't see anything wrong with that.
Welcome to post 1042 about afk-cloaking, polls say the number of support posts will be low.
Add drone repair bays to carriers |
AeXu
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 21:39:00 -
[6]
/signed
|
Santiago Fahahrri
Galactic Geographic
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 21:53:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Santiago Fahahrri on 09/02/2010 21:53:21 Absolutely no support.
Edit: Oh, and nerf Local.
|
Drake Draconis
Minmatar Shadow Cadre Looney Toons.
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 22:04:00 -
[8]
Grow a backbone nooblet.
/me not supporting. ========================= CEO of Shadow Cadre http://www.shadowcadre.com ========================= |
Jonah Pod
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 22:33:00 -
[9]
That's hilarious.
No support.
(Oh, and buff local)
|
Tagami Wasp
Caldari Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 22:48:00 -
[10]
HTFU ------------ Railgun performance required fix: - +15% railgun damage modifier - +10% PG for Caldari railgun ships |
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 23:52:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Avoida
Originally by: Garkonite Now im not one to complain
And yet your entire post is that..one big complaint about a mechanism which utterly confounds you even though there are incredibly simple yet effective countermeasures.
Cloaking is fine.
This, basically. Nothing more to be said.
|
De'Veldrin
Minmatar Special Projects Executive The Obsidian Legion
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 23:55:00 -
[12]
I would like to propose that anyone who proposes this in the future be immediately perma forum banned --Vel
Forum Mom: Spanking the snot out of little brats. |
De Guantanamo
|
Posted - 2010.02.10 00:00:00 -
[13]
posting to confirm that people that are afk are very dangerous
|
Ancy Denaries
The Confederate Navy
|
Posted - 2010.02.10 09:08:00 -
[14]
Also, no support for you. Instead, I propose Local be made W-style even in 0.0. Thank you very much. ---- The Demigodess with a Conscience - An EVE IC Blog
Originally by: CCP Dropbear rofl
edit: ah crap, dev account. Oh well, official rofl at you sir.
|
Furb Killer
|
Posted - 2010.02.10 09:15:00 -
[15]
Yes lets nerf 0.0 income even further and drive people to lvl 4 missions
|
Khandahar Bob
|
Posted - 2010.02.11 01:34:00 -
[16]
Completely ridiculous.
|
Zhula Guixgrixks
Increasing Success by Lowering Expectations
|
Posted - 2010.02.11 15:19:00 -
[17]
Edited by: Zhula Guixgrixks on 11/02/2010 15:23:13 NO
Cloakers are a feature of Eve. They gather intel and lower enemies morale (this op). Perfect balance atm.
|
Gypsio III
Dirty Filthy Perverts
|
Posted - 2010.02.11 18:04:00 -
[18]
I was not informed that 0.0 could be dangerous. Surely this is not intended? I should be allowed to carebear in peace protected by instant, infallible local!
|
Xonus Calimar
Terra Incognita Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2010.02.11 18:28:00 -
[19]
Paging AFK Cloaker to this tread... -Xonus ___________________________________ My opinions may not necessarily reflect the opinions of my Corporation or Alliance. |
Larkonis Trassler
Genos Occidere Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2010.02.11 18:39:00 -
[20]
If you are unable to defend your space from such incursions then you don't deserve it.
Please resize your signature to the maximum file size of 24000 bytes. Zymurgist No. Larkonis |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |