|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 36 post(s) |
Aemonchichi
Limited Access Guardian Society
30
|
Posted - 2012.06.28 21:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
so if i exploit a game mechanic over and over to amass insane amount of LPs ISKies etc for weeks and then i go : lulz ccp i owned the system then i get plex for snitches ?
you should name that programm more appropriate cause i doubt a person can snitch itself ^^
i am happy you come to the conclusion this was a exploit but i do not see you acting according to it, in fact it feels like you are encouraging players to repeat stuff like that in the future
taking the gain of someone using a exploit deliberatly should be the most basic reaction and cannot be part of a "fine" or "punishment"
in fact they exploited excessively and after correction of the exploited mechanism they get rewarded with plex
that does not even remotely feel right to me and i think CCP let a opportunity slip to make a clear statement of how they do not want stuff like this to happen ever again |
Aemonchichi
Limited Access Guardian Society
32
|
Posted - 2012.07.03 19:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
ccp sreegs can u explain why ccp in this situation decided not to punish the exploiters ? |
Aemonchichi
Limited Access Guardian Society
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.04 16:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Aemonchichi wrote:ccp sreegs can u explain why ccp in this situation decided not to punish the exploiters ?
my question is still standing , CCP said in the dev blog it was a exploit and phuuleeeeze refrain from answering questions not asked in your direction goons and affiliates 8)
it is clear that under this circumstances your opinions are biased
the point was well judged that it was an exploit, ccp decides so and takes actions that make sense like revoking all ill gotten gains, but no punishment ? for a exploit ? i wanna hear from ccp sreegs why this absolutley inconclusive action was taken ( no to mention a snitch plex award, lol , as if someone could snitch himself)
all this looks a bit awkwardly constructed and not logically acted from step to step , the motivations from ccp are in question here
|
Aemonchichi
Limited Access Guardian Society
35
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 10:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Read the thread and dev blog and you'll find that your question has already been answered. Sorry you didn't like the answer.
dear troll i have read all the devblog and all ccp posts in this thread and no answer was give to my question at all
my question still stands: why were the exploiters not punished?
the only 2 arguments sreegs/ccp wise on this is :
1. because they snitched themselves at a point were we already saw that there was an exploit happening and we were investigating (thats not the wording but the meaning) - does this sound strange to anyone but me ?
2. because we felt this is best for the game - best ? wtf is best for the game here ? to show players can exploit and if the see posts from ccp that they are aware of something going on they go make a post and sack a bunch o plexes ? no sreegs this is in no way good for the game
both of these are not sufficient answers at all, if these are all ccp sreegs wants to give - hell yeah lets exploit the **** out of this game lol ? maybe eve has really reached a point where ccp doesnt give a **** about it anymore 8( |
Aemonchichi
Limited Access Guardian Society
35
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 13:07:00 -
[5] - Quote
it still is no answer, the players made their post after ccp said in the news that something fishy is going on and they investigate
ccp clearly states that is was an exploit, and sreegs states that they already knew there was someone manipulating LPs way out of scale
so saying they remain in good standing should read they remain in awesome standing cause they get a bunch of plexes on top of no punishment
and sreegs, as a former goon member, communicating all this to the community, is not a wise choice made by ccp even if u grant him that he above acting biased
no wonder this smells fishy and i still would like an explanation above the one litte sentence from the dev blog
sandbox does not mean: no rules, hack, bot and exploit as u like and for a game i invest a lot of time and effort into i would like to see CCP more dedicated to the enforcement of their own rules |
Aemonchichi
Limited Access Guardian Society
36
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 15:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
another fanboi repeating other posters mindless gibberish 8) dude best keep it to yourself
but as the question is not answered in the devblog, no matter how often ppl yell its there 8) not it isnt - seems u should read it yourself again and slow this time trying to understand it
|
|
|
|