Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
|
CCP Manifest
C C P C C P Alliance
442
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 04:39:00 -
[31] - Quote
Xercodo wrote:No it's called appreciating the creativity and awesomeness that the community has.
It is I, the mighty decider of Facebook/Twitter/G+ content!
This pretty much nails it. Just an awesome video. I try to highlight each well done/funny/etc etc video. If you have one that's amazing, please send it to me @CCP_Manifest or evemail.
Glad to see mention of the EVE article. There should be several going out. That's me emailing press contacts saying... check out what our players are brewing. 100% them. The videos they make are awesome etc etc. In this case I paired it with an announcement of the AT X starting.
I really try to keep it real both in terms of PR and Social Media, but surely this is exactly the sort of player action that I should be promoting, I mean, right?!
======== o7 CCP Manifest | Public Relations and Social Media | @ccp_manifest |
|
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
317
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 06:59:00 -
[32] - Quote
Infinitio Krystallos wrote:Surely we have not forgotten what was revealed on March 28th 2012 have we ? Forgotten? No. Moved on with our lives? Yes.
In the here and now we have what's shaping up to be (by some estimates) the largest multiplayer conflict in video game history. Only EVE is capable of hosting game play on such a massive and complex scale. The Mittani is but one of many figures in this conflict and he has a decentralized role. The Fanfest scandal and the FW LP Scandal have nothing to do with this. Support showing T2 and faction frequency crystal damage in the info window. (Link was wrong, now fixed) |
Ashrik Tyr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 07:56:00 -
[33] - Quote
You can hate Goonswarm and Honeybadgers or Test if you like
But if you can't appreciate a well-done propaganda video made for a game that we all spend way too much time obsessing about, then something may be wrong with you. |
Elena Melkan
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
56
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 08:08:00 -
[34] - Quote
TEST dudes usually make great videos, I have watched several of them. This one is kind of mild in propaganda: SoCo is not bashed that hard, instead all the alliances fighting on that side are nicely presented in the end of the video, making it more interesting. This is the kind of video that may even get the attention of those people who have never heard of EVE, or who have thought about trying it. 50,000 characters fighting over a region? Man, that's something.
CCP would be silly if they never promoted this video. I bet if one of the SoCo alliances made a great video like this, it would be promoted too, just because of its artistic value. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1138
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 08:10:00 -
[35] - Quote
Elena Melkan wrote:TEST dudes usually make great videos, I have watched several of them. This one is kind of mild in propaganda: SoCo is not bashed that hard, instead all the alliances fighting on that side are nicely presented in the end of the video, making it more interesting. This is the kind of video that may even get the attention of those people who have never heard of EVE, or who have thought about trying it. 50,000 characters fighting over a region? Man, that's something.
CCP would be silly if they never promoted this video. I bet if one of the SoCo alliances made a great video like this, it would be promoted too, just because of its artistic value. It needs memorable likes like
Instead we found CTAs Instead we found batphones Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1138
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 08:12:00 -
[36] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Infinitio Krystallos wrote:Surely we have not forgotten what was revealed on March 28th 2012 have we ? Forgotten? No. Moved on with our lives? Yes. In the here and now we have what's shaping up to be (by some estimates) the largest multiplayer conflict in video game history. Only EVE is capable of hosting game play on such a massive and complex scale. The Mittani is but one of many figures in this conflict and he has a decentralized role. The Fanfest scandal and the FW LP Scandal have nothing to do with this. I actually looked at that for a while and was thinking.
That was the fanfest thing. And we beat up Tenal. A month later was the Burn Jita, then hulkageddon. At some point we burned Venal. And OTEC.
And then not much and some people from the south bashed their heads again OTEC. And now we're in Delve fighting. Good stuff. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Marconus Orion
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
153
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 08:18:00 -
[37] - Quote
Video should have shown a total break down in number of pilots on each side. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1138
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 08:20:00 -
[38] - Quote
Marconus Orion wrote:Video should have shown a total break down in number of pilots on each side. I would like to know myself. I think the numbers are fairly even in characters, active accounts hard to say.
But in any case, morale is the thing, and we'll see how well stuff turns out, if there's a rout, failcascade, "didn't want that XXYY anyway" or a hardcore meatgrinder.
Or, you know, PL dropping titans on things. Oh maybe I should fit a cyno on ... will it go on my scorpion? Just in case, you know, the FC wants to batphone a supercapital fleet. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Marconus Orion
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
153
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 08:25:00 -
[39] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Marconus Orion wrote:Video should have shown a total break down in number of pilots on each side. I would like to know myself. I think the numbers are fairly even in characters, active accounts hard to say. But in any case, morale is the thing, and we'll see how well stuff turns out, if there's a rout, failcascade, "didn't want that XXYY anyway" or a hardcore meatgrinder. Or, you know, PL dropping titans on things. Oh maybe I should fit a cyno on ... will it go on my scorpion? Just in case, you know, the FC wants to batphone a supercapital fleet.
There a sweet kill board (that is easy on the eyes) for people to F5 that gives some perspective on the war? Maybe a section that includes who is on which side, numbers and dropped corps and pilots? Maybe even an up to date map that shows the spread of influence on Delve of one side vs. the other? All wrapped up in some nifty one stop shop for all your Delve War pleasure needs?
Sorry, crap ton of work and all, but thought it would be a nice touch for all to follow without having to listen to back and forth purse slapping on the forums. |
Arkon Olacar
Imperial Guardians The Aurora Shadow
53
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 08:27:00 -
[40] - Quote
Maybe SoCo would get more publicity if they actually undocked for once... "The rest will be in the blog rather than invented at the keyboards of forum posters and bloggers." -á-á-á-á-á-á-á - CCP Sreegs, 23/06/2012
Umad forum warriors? |
|
Marconus Orion
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
154
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 08:30:00 -
[41] - Quote
Arkon Olacar wrote:Maybe SoCo would get more publicity if they actually undocked for once... Well how many you have fighting them right now? If it is 500 vs. 500 and they don't undock, well that is just sad. If it is 1000 CFC+HB vs. 50 SoCo... well, do you blame them? |
Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
826
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 08:34:00 -
[42] - Quote
OMIGAWD! I read this thread without my tinfoil hat! NOW CCP CAN SEE MY BRAIN! Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1138
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 08:36:00 -
[43] - Quote
Marconus Orion wrote:Arkon Olacar wrote:Maybe SoCo would get more publicity if they actually undocked for once... Well how many you have fighting them right now? If it is 500 vs. 500 and they don't undock, well that is just sad. If it is 1000 CFC+HB vs. 50 SoCo... well, do you blame them? That's a bit of a problem.
See if people start shooting back, broadcast goes up, suddenly there's a few hundred more drakes waiting to undock and blargghhhh.
Then we go to chase "tackled supercaps" which ends up at someone's tower.. which we shoot ... Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Arkon Olacar
Imperial Guardians The Aurora Shadow
53
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 08:36:00 -
[44] - Quote
Marconus Orion wrote:Arkon Olacar wrote:Maybe SoCo would get more publicity if they actually undocked for once... Well how many you have fighting them right now? If it is 500 vs. 500 and they don't undock, well that is just sad. If it is 1000 CFC+HB vs. 50 SoCo... well, do you blame them? What about when theres 200 CFC+HB, and 500 SoCo? Or did we bring too many dudes again? "The rest will be in the blog rather than invented at the keyboards of forum posters and bloggers." -á-á-á-á-á-á-á - CCP Sreegs, 23/06/2012
Umad forum warriors? |
Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
388
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 11:02:00 -
[45] - Quote
Arkon Olacar wrote:Marconus Orion wrote:Arkon Olacar wrote:Maybe SoCo would get more publicity if they actually undocked for once... Well how many you have fighting them right now? If it is 500 vs. 500 and they don't undock, well that is just sad. If it is 1000 CFC+HB vs. 50 SoCo... well, do you blame them? What about when theres 200 CFC+HB, and 500 SoCo? Or did we bring too many dudes again?
You can't blame any one, it's the game, you want to limit your losses and kill the most possible so every tactic is fair, who was the silly one ever thought war was for gentlemen?
brb |
TheBreadMuncher
Boxxed Up Industries EPIC Alliance
141
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 11:03:00 -
[46] - Quote
No More Heroes wrote:Gas thread and ban OP.
Cancel CSM votes and ban The Mittani.
Oh wait. "We will create the introduction thread if that is requested by the community. Also, we will have an ISD Seminar about the CCL team in the coming weeks in which you can ask your questions about the CCL team and provide some constructive feedback to us." - Countless pages of locked threads and numerous permabanned accounts later, change is coming. |
Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
653
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 11:06:00 -
[47] - Quote
Istvaan Shogaatsu wrote:See, this is why CCP dreads involving themselves in the first place. There's always some yutz crying favoritism.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure thats the definition of favoritism. They're not involving themselves in anything I do. We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |
Kimmi Chan
Illuminatus Reforged The Revenant Order
219
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 12:58:00 -
[48] - Quote
Elena Melkan wrote:TEST dudes usually make great videos, I have watched several of them. This one is kind of mild in propaganda: SoCo is not bashed that hard, instead all the alliances fighting on that side are nicely presented in the end of the video, making it more interesting. This is the kind of video that may even get the attention of those people who have never heard of EVE, or who have thought about trying it. 50,000 characters fighting over a region? Man, that's something.
CCP would be silly if they never promoted this video. I bet if one of the SoCo alliances made a great video like this, it would be promoted too, just because of its artistic value.
I am reposting the video and the PCGamer article everywhere that I can. The sheer magnitude of this event, regardless of which side you come down on, is immense and historical.
To be honest, I have not really concerned myself much with the doings in Null. But, the video and the events that are going on at this very moment in time are causing me to re-evaluate that position. I might have to apply to a Null-Sec corp/alliance. Anyone need a half-way decent Caldari pilot?
-á"Miners mine so I don't have to." ~Metal Icarus |
Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1210
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 12:58:00 -
[49] - Quote
Mr Kidd wrote:Istvaan Shogaatsu wrote:See, this is why CCP dreads involving themselves in the first place. There's always some yutz crying favoritism. Yeah, I'm pretty sure thats the definition of favoritism. They're not involving themselves in anything I do.
do you do anything involving 10000+ players
that's right, you don't a rogue goon |
Virgil Travis
GWA Corp Unified Church of the Unobligated
378
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 13:20:00 -
[50] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:I really try to keep it real both in terms of PR and Social Media, but surely this is exactly the sort of player action that I should be promoting, I mean, right?!
I say let the players worry about the politics, let CCP do the PR, no matter who makes the video. It was well done and a good talking point for people outside, and obviously in, the game.
SoCo should to one as a riposte to this one, more material for the PR machine.
Unified Church of the Unobligated - madness in the method Mamma didn't raise no victims. |
|
Comrade Commizzar
Eve Revolutionary Army
63
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 13:36:00 -
[51] - Quote
forestwho wrote:Should it be a good thing or a bad thing? A facebook message directing to a one sided propaganda youtube video.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNn3GDBLyFcI think its realy on the edge. Will this be the final signal that ccp employees have too much influence in a certain 0.0 alliance (that also coincidently hold vast amount of horrible unbalanced tech moons?) ***********
CCP crossed the line of impartiality a long time ago... that is the reason that my response to their invitation to answer the annual survey was to thrown it in the waste basket as soon as it hit my inbox.
I did however take the time to respond to them via the email address they provided to once again tell them how poorly designed the resource "game" in EVE was regarding the notion of evolving challenging groups who compete over the control of Zero. I also repeated that they cater to groups like the Goons entirely too much... much to the detriment of their game, which inhibits player retention and subscriber growth.
I have only remained in EVE (at the expense of whoever it is that has paid for my PLEX by their isk that I screwed them out of) to see if CCP will ever actually make a "game" out of EVE worth playing. If they did, I would actually be willing to pay for that in cash. As it stands now, I spend my money on other online games.
Am I negative? No... I'm positive ! EVE is CRAP in it's current state ! |
Russell Casey
Goldbug Inc.
169
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 13:42:00 -
[52] - Quote
Well, this explains why recruitment channel suddenly has a lot of "OMG I WANT TO JOIN GOONZ TEH VIDEO WAS AWESOME" posts.
It also explains why there's been more "HELP! I NEED TO SEE A GOON REP ASAP MAH STUFF IZ GONE" posts too. |
Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
501
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 13:50:00 -
[53] - Quote
Comrade Commizzar wrote:forestwho wrote:Should it be a good thing or a bad thing? A facebook message directing to a one sided propaganda youtube video.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNn3GDBLyFcI think its realy on the edge. Will this be the final signal that ccp employees have too much influence in a certain 0.0 alliance (that also coincidently hold vast amount of horrible unbalanced tech moons?) *********** CCP crossed the line of impartiality a long time ago... that is the reason that my response to their invitation to answer the annual survey was to thrown it in the waste basket as soon as it hit my inbox. I did however take the time to respond to them via the email address they provided to once again tell them how poorly designed the resource "game" in EVE was regarding the notion of evolving challenging groups who compete over the control of Zero. I also repeated that they cater to groups like the Goons entirely too much... much to the detriment of their game, which inhibits player retention and subscriber growth. I have only remained in EVE (at the expense of whoever it is that has paid for my PLEX by their isk that I screwed them out of) to see if CCP will ever actually make a "game" out of EVE worth playing. If they did, I would actually be willing to pay for that in cash. As it stands now, I spend my money on other online games. Am I negative? No... I'm positive ! EVE is CRAP in it's current state !
Thank you for not voicing your opinion on the state of things in the anonymous survey. Now we can get to stuffing it and forcing everyone into nullsec. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |
Comrade Commizzar
Eve Revolutionary Army
63
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 14:05:00 -
[54] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Comrade Commizzar wrote:forestwho wrote:Should it be a good thing or a bad thing? A facebook message directing to a one sided propaganda youtube video.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNn3GDBLyFcI think its realy on the edge. Will this be the final signal that ccp employees have too much influence in a certain 0.0 alliance (that also coincidently hold vast amount of horrible unbalanced tech moons?) *********** CCP crossed the line of impartiality a long time ago... that is the reason that my response to their invitation to answer the annual survey was to thrown it in the waste basket as soon as it hit my inbox. I did however take the time to respond to them via the email address they provided to once again tell them how poorly designed the resource "game" in EVE was regarding the notion of evolving challenging groups who compete over the control of Zero. I also repeated that they cater to groups like the Goons entirely too much... much to the detriment of their game, which inhibits player retention and subscriber growth. I have only remained in EVE (at the expense of whoever it is that has paid for my PLEX by their isk that I screwed them out of) to see if CCP will ever actually make a "game" out of EVE worth playing. If they did, I would actually be willing to pay for that in cash. As it stands now, I spend my money on other online games. Am I negative? No... I'm positive ! EVE is CRAP in it's current state ! Thank you for not voicing your opinion on the state of things in the anonymous survey. Now we can get to stuffing it and forcing everyone into nullsec.
Not sure what you mean by that... but if you are implying that you are going to "force" me into Null... you are too late... I've been in Null for years. I spend half my time in null screwing Alliance members out of their isk on the markets to pay for my PLEX. My complaints have nothing to do with the HighSec vs Null arguements. It has to do with the CRAP resource distributions that CCP has failed to balance in such a way as to foster the development of COMPETING Null Factions... NOT THE MAINTENANCE OF BORING ANCIENT REGIMES POURED IN CONCRETE. You know what they say about the entertainment value of watching concrete or paint dry !! Then again, I guess CCP doesn't know.
|
Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
114
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 14:15:00 -
[55] - Quote
Well thanks for the youtube link, OP. That was pretty amazing, whoever put the film together deserves a medal. I especially liked the fleet of drakes, my heart swelled with pride when I saw em.
Look, the video wasn't a major propoganda fest at all, in fact, if anything, it resembled an advertisement for your typical boxing or UFC match. My only gripe is they scrolled through the opponenets list of alliances too fast so I really didn't see who all is involved. CCP isn't taking any sides by advertising this, it's just a really good video and it promotes their game.
I am finding it hard to believe test has 50k friends, I haven't always been here but I've never seen more than 52k or so log on, if this is true, the other side is kinda effed. |
Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
501
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 14:20:00 -
[56] - Quote
Comrade Commizzar wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:Comrade Commizzar wrote:forestwho wrote:Should it be a good thing or a bad thing? A facebook message directing to a one sided propaganda youtube video.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNn3GDBLyFcI think its realy on the edge. Will this be the final signal that ccp employees have too much influence in a certain 0.0 alliance (that also coincidently hold vast amount of horrible unbalanced tech moons?) *********** CCP crossed the line of impartiality a long time ago... that is the reason that my response to their invitation to answer the annual survey was to thrown it in the waste basket as soon as it hit my inbox. I did however take the time to respond to them via the email address they provided to once again tell them how poorly designed the resource "game" in EVE was regarding the notion of evolving challenging groups who compete over the control of Zero. I also repeated that they cater to groups like the Goons entirely too much... much to the detriment of their game, which inhibits player retention and subscriber growth. I have only remained in EVE (at the expense of whoever it is that has paid for my PLEX by their isk that I screwed them out of) to see if CCP will ever actually make a "game" out of EVE worth playing. If they did, I would actually be willing to pay for that in cash. As it stands now, I spend my money on other online games. Am I negative? No... I'm positive ! EVE is CRAP in it's current state ! Thank you for not voicing your opinion on the state of things in the anonymous survey. Now we can get to stuffing it and forcing everyone into nullsec. Not sure what you mean by that... but if you are implying that you are going to "force" me into Null... you are too late... I've been in Null for years. I spend half my time in null screwing Alliance members out of their isk on the markets to pay for my PLEX. My complaints have nothing to do with the HighSec vs Null arguements. It has to do with the CRAP resource distributions that CCP has failed to balance in such a way as to foster the development of COMPETING Null Factions... NOT THE MAINTENANCE OF BORING ANCIENT REGIMES POURED IN CONCRETE. You know what they say about the entertainment value of watching concrete or paint dry !! Then again, I guess CCP doesn't know.
So basically you tried to show CCP what you really think about your perceptions of favoritism by not showing them anything at all?
Sounds like my ex. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |
Comrade Commizzar
Eve Revolutionary Army
63
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 16:26:00 -
[57] - Quote
[/quote]
So basically you tried to show CCP what you really think about your perceptions of favoritism by not showing them anything at all?
Sounds like my ex.[/quote]
Repeating what I wrote...
" I did however take the time to respond to them via the email address they provided to once again tell them how poorly designed the resource "game" in EVE was regarding the notion of evolving challenging groups who compete over the control of Zero. I also repeated that they cater to groups like the Goons entirely too much... much to the detriment of their game, which inhibits player retention and subscriber growth."
Now you know why your ex left you... YOU DON"T LISTEN. A problem you have in common with CCP. |
Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
501
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 16:48:00 -
[58] - Quote
Comrade Commizzar wrote:Lapine Davion wrote:
So basically you tried to show CCP what you really think about your perceptions of favoritism by not showing them anything at all?
Sounds like my ex.
Repeating what I wrote... " I did however take the time to respond to them via the email address they provided to once again tell them how poorly designed the resource "game" in EVE was regarding the notion of evolving challenging groups who compete over the control of Zero. I also repeated that they cater to groups like the Goons entirely too much... much to the detriment of their game, which inhibits player retention and subscriber growth." Now you know why your ex left you... YOU DON"T LISTEN. A problem you have in common with CCP.
Explain to me how the resource game was designed to favor Goons. Cause when the moon rebalance happened almost all the valuable moons were taken away from Delve, where Goons lived at the time.
I just ignored your comment about the "resource game" because it's the same argument I hear from people who don't actually know anything. Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |
Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
833
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 17:05:00 -
[59] - Quote
So basically you tried to show CCP what you really think about your perceptions of favoritism by not showing them anything at all?
Sounds like my ex.[/quote]
Repeating what I wrote...
" I did however take the time to respond to them via the email address they provided to once again tell them how poorly designed the resource "game" in EVE was regarding the notion of evolving challenging groups who compete over the control of Zero. I also repeated that they cater to groups like the Goons entirely too much... much to the detriment of their game, which inhibits player retention and subscriber growth."
Now you know why your ex left you... YOU DON"T LISTEN. A problem you have in common with CCP.[/quote]
Look, its someone else who hates Eve and is only playing because they managed to get some isk without any effort so its actually ok to carry on playing even though they hate it. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
317
|
Posted - 2012.06.30 17:32:00 -
[60] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Arkon Olacar wrote:Marconus Orion wrote:Arkon Olacar wrote:Maybe SoCo would get more publicity if they actually undocked for once... Well how many you have fighting them right now? If it is 500 vs. 500 and they don't undock, well that is just sad. If it is 1000 CFC+HB vs. 50 SoCo... well, do you blame them? What about when theres 200 CFC+HB, and 500 SoCo? Or did we bring too many dudes again? You can't blame any one, it's the game, you want to limit your losses and kill the most possible so every tactic is fair, who was the silly one ever thought war was for gentlemen? I think you're missing the part where they refuse to fight when they outnumber us at least two to one. Maybe it's because they know they'll still lose. Support showing T2 and faction frequency crystal damage in the info window. (Link was wrong, now fixed) |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |