|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
|
CCP Veritas
C C P C C P Alliance
537
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 15:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
The Rules wrote:Pre-Qualifying Rankings
If at any point, teams are level in Win/Loss and also level in points scored, the following will be used in order to determine ranking position.
If the teams disputing rank have fought each other at any point, the winner is higher. The current ranking (W/L, then points) of the last team that you defeated. Higher is better. The current ranking of the last team that defeated you. Again, higher is better. As odd as it may sound, the situation you mention comparing RvB and Hun is accurate. There are still a host of teams that tie given the above rules - I'm working with the rules people to sort that all out. They're a little tired so it might take some time. CCP Veritas - Senior Programmer - EVE Software |
|
|
CCP Veritas
C C P C C P Alliance
538
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 17:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
You're missing RED.OverLord, just above Choke Point I believe. CCP Veritas - Senior Programmer - EVE Software |
|
|
CCP Veritas
C C P C C P Alliance
538
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 19:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
Official rankings are up: http://community.eveonline.com/en/tournament/rankings
Schedule will come later. CCP Veritas - Senior Programmer - EVE Software |
|
|
CCP Veritas
C C P C C P Alliance
539
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 20:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
A simple random number broke ties that we did not have a rule to call.
We're most certainly not going to revamp the entire ranking rules once the tournament is underway. CCP Veritas - Senior Programmer - EVE Software |
|
|
CCP Veritas
C C P C C P Alliance
539
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 20:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
Maliatida wrote:CCP Veritas wrote:A simple random number broke ties that we did not have a rule to call.
We're most certainly not going to revamp the entire ranking rules once the tournament is underway. Why bother having a tournament at all then? Just randomly generate a winner. ATX, Alliance Raffle Tournament. The initial schedule was determined by random as well, are you upset about that? CCP Veritas - Senior Programmer - EVE Software |
|
|
CCP Veritas
C C P C C P Alliance
539
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 20:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
I agree with many of your criticisms and some of your solutions, Singulis. CCP Veritas - Senior Programmer - EVE Software |
|
|
CCP Veritas
C C P C C P Alliance
539
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 21:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
The chance of having two teams with an identical history with all of their opponents having identical histories gets astonishingly unlikely once we've had a few rounds of fights. It's just that with one round it's very, very likely. CCP Veritas - Senior Programmer - EVE Software |
|
|
CCP Veritas
C C P C C P Alliance
539
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 21:46:00 -
[8] - Quote
It's history within the same tourney sir. CCP Veritas - Senior Programmer - EVE Software |
|
|
CCP Veritas
C C P C C P Alliance
539
|
Posted - 2012.07.02 22:01:00 -
[9] - Quote
http://community.eveonline.com/en/tournament/format
Pre-Qualifying Rankings
If at any point, teams are level in Win/Loss and also level in points scored, the following will be used in order to determine ranking position.
If the teams disputing rank have fought each other at any point, the winner is higher. The current ranking (W/L, then points) of the last team that you defeated. Higher is better. The current ranking of the last team that defeated you. Again, higher is better. CCP Veritas - Senior Programmer - EVE Software |
|
|
|
|