Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tres Farmer
Gallente Federation Intelligence Service
|
Posted - 2010.12.20 13:06:00 -
[181]
support Public Idea Tracker | 24hr PLEX |
Ogogov
Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.12.20 15:24:00 -
[182]
Hear that noise?
That's my Astarte in the hangar, crying. ;_;
|
Fistme
|
Posted - 2010.12.20 17:45:00 -
[183]
|
Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2010.12.20 18:52:00 -
[184]
I support this proposal.
But I think that it is also important to consider what CCP has done with the addition of the Tech 3 Strategic Cruisers as some of the improvements requested in this thread are easily covered by current T3 cruiser fits.
While I am not saying that T3 cruisers should supersede Field Command ships, CCP made a choice to introduce a class of ships that is on-par and sometimes superior to the elder statesmen of T2 hulls.
Yes, I am aware of the financial and training expenses involved with fielding a T3 cruiser.
|
Alias 6322A
|
Posted - 2010.12.20 19:08:00 -
[185]
Supported
If you look at the prereq's for a Field ship, you'll notice the assault ship skills are needed. I always assumed that these ships were meant to be the third ship in the "Assault" versions.
Harpy/Hawk >>> Cerberus/Eagle >>> Nighthawk
Same idea for the other races. These ships are meant to be heavy hitters but not much else. Like all Tech II ships, they have a 'role' that makes them more specific to a task compared to T1 ships, but more powerful in that role. 'Tis how EVE works.
As a side note...if you look at all the other types of Tech II ships, you'll notice that within a hull-class every ship has a Tech II version. Why is it that the Myrmidon, Drake, Hurricane, and Harbinger don't have Tech II counterparts...it's interesting that as the ships that 'favor damage' compared to their brothers, which usually have some sort of tank bonus, they didn't become the Field Command Ships. Instead we have two kinds of Ferox, Brutix, Cyclone, and Prophecy. Just food for thought for a potentially new skin (but not new ship).
|
Elana Dyson
|
Posted - 2010.12.20 20:24:00 -
[186]
Supported.
|
Mielono
SWARTA
|
Posted - 2010.12.27 11:12:00 -
[187]
Originally by: Culmen
A cat is like that carebear who sticks around only while there's food, and at best kills a few rats.A dog F*cking enforces NBSI, and deep down is slightly disappointed you aren't tak |
Orar Ironfist
Veto.
|
Posted - 2010.12.27 21:32:00 -
[188]
**** Yes. CS5 Crew checking in. Havent flown the Astarte in years and I desperately want that to change.
|
Ephemeron
Solitairian Society
|
Posted - 2010.12.27 23:54:00 -
[189]
I have also spent some time analyzing fleet command ships, deciding they weren't worth it. The t1 BC is very close to matching their power and 1/10 the cost. T3 are better yet, at double the cost.
While roaming in 0.0, I notice very few people use fleet commands - much more people use t3. Most people go for BC - cause they are just so damn cheap.
I think it's a good idea to boost them.
|
Meadowlark
|
Posted - 2011.01.06 01:46:00 -
[190]
I support this.
|
|
Khaeros
|
Posted - 2011.01.06 08:05:00 -
[191]
I support the motion, these ships need some adjustments
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |