Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Arvald
Caldari The Lumberjacks
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 16:27:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Arvald on 05/04/2010 16:34:38 Edited by: Arvald on 05/04/2010 16:27:13 Now that the issue has been brought out into the open, we need to get a public discussion of why ccp enacted these rules, a discussion between mods and players, as the issue will only get worse if they just keep locking threads and further alienating their player base, all in favor for the mods to start a thread to discuss these new rules?
Originally by: CCP Shadow Arvald, carry on with imparting your pearls of wisdom.
|
Blane Xero
The Firestorm Cartel
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 16:29:00 -
[2]
:D _____________________________________ Haruhiist since December 2008
Originally by: CCP Fallout :facepalm:
|
Myxx
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 16:29:00 -
[3]
Even though they wont, because they don't enjoy being questioned, I'd support this. ----
Originally by: CCP Mitnal I can assure you I won't be keeping ferrets warm in my pants.
Rule #5 repeal petition |
UnicornGary
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 16:30:00 -
[4]
+1
|
Trinity Patch
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 16:31:00 -
[5]
+2
|
iGTFO
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 16:31:00 -
[6]
+3
|
c bootini
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 16:32:00 -
[7]
/Signed
|
Paknac Queltel
Standards and Practices
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 16:41:00 -
[8]
I support this. Obviously there's a clash between at least part of the community and the rules. This is not an isolated case to be handled in a petition, moreso because the results of a petition may not be posted on the forums. "The thread-locks will blot out the sun!" "Then we will post in the shade!"
|
Kuar Z'thain
Fraser's Finest
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 16:44:00 -
[9]
Transparency please. We still don't even have an official reason for the rule change.
|
Lance Fighter
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 16:49:00 -
[10]
Forum Trolls - OOPE division, checking in
|
|
Tippia
Reikoku IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 16:50:00 -
[11]
——— “If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡… you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.” — Karath Piki |
Dray
Euphoria Released
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 16:55:00 -
[12]
An explanation will do me, even if it's not what I want to hear as long as it's honest.
|
JackTheFrost
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 16:56:00 -
[13]
support
|
Zions Child
Carthage Industries Consortium.
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 16:57:00 -
[14]
+Infinity
|
Mashie Saldana
Red Federation
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 16:59:00 -
[15]
[ISSUE] Ridiculous Forum Moderation |
Vak'ran
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 17:11:00 -
[16]
supported
This is an issue which would benefit from ccp's proclaimed ability to discuss their operation with their customers.
Vak'Ran is your local official non-dedicated part-time advocate of reading comprehension and proliferation of intelligence on the EVE Online Forum |
Sera Ryskin
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 17:17:00 -
[17]
A good idea can not be proposed too may times. ==========
Merin is banned (yet again). Until she returns, you've got me to entertain you!
* Your signature is locked due to violating forum rules. Please file a petition once you have an appropriate signature - Fallout |
S'qarpium D'igil
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 17:25:00 -
[18]
|
Xen Gin
Silurian Operations
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 17:45:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Arvald Rules 17 And 5 Transparency and Discussion
I support, but quite frankly, their only route they are allowing is "File a petition", and we all know you can't have transparency and discussion on a petition, when just to have that petition seen will take weeks. _________________________________ ## You got that? Right I'll be back in approximately 300 seconds to retort! ## |
Alexeph Stoekai
Stoekai Corp
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 19:15:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Xen Gin
Originally by: Arvald Rules 17 And 5 Transparency and Discussion
I support, but quite frankly, their only route they are allowing is "File a petition", and we all know you can't have transparency and discussion on a petition, when just to have that petition seen will take weeks.
I made a petition asking what the hell was going on. Got a lovely not-answer in return which basically amounted to "It's the rules." They don't want to discuss the matter even when they can control the information exchange. -----
|
|
Cristopher Dante
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 19:55:00 -
[21]
**** us off enough and we will leave...
The community makes this game CCP, don't ruin it.
Also, +9001
|
Myxx
Gallente Daughters of Venus Reborn
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 20:02:00 -
[22]
We won, in OOPE at least. Signature not appropriate - Adida |
Takseen
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 20:21:00 -
[23]
Edited by: Takseen on 05/04/2010 20:22:22 I totally agree.
The idea of an off-topic forum that doesn't allow the discussion of other games AT ALL is frankly bizarre and pointless. And stifling discussion of the situation isn't helping anything.
Edit : Oh sorry, they changed the rule already. Nice:) |
|
CCP Shadow
C C P C C P Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.04.05 21:43:00 -
[24]
Game discussions are permitted in Out of Pod Experience once again. Here's the post that explains what happened.
Also, the Out of Pod Experience forum rule 5 has been updated and I made a brief post explaining the ground rules of game discussions in Out of Pod Experience.
|
|
Arvald
Caldari The Lumberjacks
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 04:20:00 -
[25]
Originally by: CCP Shadow Game discussions are permitted in Out of Pod Experience once again. Here's the post that explains what happened.
Also, the Out of Pod Experience forum rule 5 has been updated and I made a brief post explaining the ground rules of game discussions in Out of Pod Experience.
WOO, i love you shadow
Leader of the OOPE 17-5 resistance. |
Aera Aiana
|
Posted - 2010.04.06 10:01:00 -
[26]
Supported :)
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |