Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 98 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
krakinette
Caldari Epsilon Lyr Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 10:34:00 -
[571]
+1
fixed lag
|
Miraki Alsento
Nutz N Boltz
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 10:34:00 -
[572]
+1
|
Eugene Roserie
Strategic Naval Research Institute ANAHEIM ELECTRONICS Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 10:40:00 -
[573]
I'd rather like to see existing features are refined and polished.
|
jattell
Celestial Horizon Corp. United Corporate Ventures
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 10:41:00 -
[574]
+1
|
Derus Grobb
Selectus Pravus Lupus
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 10:44:00 -
[575]
Totally support this. ---
|
Lifinity
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 10:48:00 -
[576]
supported!
|
Tanare
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 10:55:00 -
[577]
+1
|
NightmareX
Dark-Rising IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:01:00 -
[578]
I have no other options than just supporting this.
Best proposal in a very long time here.
|
Tolrok Qorte
Minmatar Intrepid Falcons
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:04:00 -
[579]
I absolutely agree. +1
|
Mental Mantis
Agony Unleashed
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:08:00 -
[580]
+1 for more time spent on features and better quality practices.
|
|
Maki Nomiya
Caldari ACME HARDWARE
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:08:00 -
[581]
YES! Fix first ... no more FUBAR ! That pesky camera reset on jumping or other session change has come back to annoy us far too many times now (to name one of a few fav featuresÖ) !!
And slideshow non-interactive EVE sux !
|
Laika Dorfmeister
Adhocracy Incorporated
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:08:00 -
[582]
+1 |
zzzDeXoNzzz
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:15:00 -
[583]
+1
|
Mynxee
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:17:00 -
[584]
Excellently stated, Dierdra!
Unless CCP commit to a change--or many changes--in the way they approach the management of releases, I fear EVE will simply become too fractured to maintain in any significant way over time. Besides the release of half-baked features, I'm also concerned about wasted resources when nearly-done features are scrapped because they weren't 100% finished by some artificial deadline. If the time, effort, and expense to get a feature to 85% or 90% is invested, then it's worth staying on track and taking the time needed to finish it. I suspect players will happily support "missed deadlines" (look at the positive response when Tyrannis got delayed; what happened when it did get released is another story)--especially if it means they get a better product.
In my view, part of a commitment to excellence must include a commitment to extending release dates realistically when doing so will result in a more robust feature set. Related to that, the investment in nearly-done features should be leveraged by allowing work to continue past deadlines so that the feature can be finished. It can then be deployed in a patch or next release. Scrapping features that already have significant investment should be a rare exception, not the rule. Any development model that demands slavish devotion to the latter is fiscally insane, not to mention dangerously demoralizing to development teams and ultimately hugely disappointing to customers.
Life In Low Sec |
Faridi Dem
Brothers of Destiny Primary.
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:18:00 -
[585]
supported!
|
Vitelius
Black Nova Corp IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:21:00 -
[586]
Most definitely supported.
|
V0n Braun
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:27:00 -
[587]
+1
complete support
|
Rokkit Kween
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:28:00 -
[588]
yes yes yes. to all points raised.
Release schedule too tight, loosen it up a bit.
Keep working on content after release rather than leaving it to gather dust.
no more new shinies till Incarna.
|
Muscaat
ASCENTIS CORPORATION Free Worlds Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:32:00 -
[589]
DV, every single word you said is true.
+1 ---------- EVE Markets - global price trends at your fingertips |
Nomi S
Free-Space-Ranger Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:34:00 -
[590]
|
|
Quetzalcoatl III
Uroboros Trading Company Taurus Quantum Dynamics
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:35:00 -
[591]
I'm with you |
Thyza
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:36:00 -
[592]
agreed. especially on treaties, they would make renting out 0.0 so much easier.
|
Draconder
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:37:00 -
[593]
You have my vote on this.
|
Klame
ICE is Coming to EVE Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:44:00 -
[594]
/signed Rest in piece |
Quivering Palm
SI Radio
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:50:00 -
[595]
Agreed ofc.
More to that, it would be great if CCP chooses to implement what the CSM have been suggesting for the past years. Lots of great ideas and proposals, but really how many make them into the patch notes in each expansion?
|
Rutilus
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:53:00 -
[596]
Hear, hear. I love this game and I want to see it Be Excellent. Less Microsoft-esque "let our paying customers beta-test the products" and more "hammer the issues out fully on Sisi, even if it means releasing late."
|
Patri Andari
Thukker Tribe Antiquities Importer
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 11:54:00 -
[597]
+1 Patri
I'll Roshambo you for that Titan |
dermannmitdemkoks
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:00:00 -
[598]
+1 definately supported its about time
|
Shardivh
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:03:00 -
[599]
Supported and really agree with the 1 "major new shiny features" expansion and 1 "fix/revise old content" expansion per year instead of what we have now. CCP, please commit to excellence!
|
Bucky O'Hair
Valklear Guard
|
Posted - 2010.06.01 12:04:00 -
[600]
I support this! Please put a freeze on future expansions, and fix the current ones! Bucky O'Hair
"If it flys it dies!"
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 98 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |