Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 98 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Reecoh Soltar
Exotic Dancer Talent Agency
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 00:03:00 -
[1231]
Supported 100%
Originally by: CCP Prism X When life throws you lemons you go... throw them at someone else and make a profit.
|
Khayvaan Shrike
Cloning Issue
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 00:06:00 -
[1232]
/signed
|
Allant Doran
Fraternitas Renatas
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 00:07:00 -
[1233]
/signed
|
Highsight
tlhlnag wo The Elders Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 00:11:00 -
[1234]
Edited by: Highsight on 03/06/2010 00:11:16 Too often in this game bugs and poor game mechanics are left in place / sacrificed on the altar of shiney new toys. Eventually this will mean an unplayable game and the users deserting. At the moment outside of the eve community Eve has a a good reputation that attracts new players. It does not take much to change this and shrinking player base and bad reviews from ex-players could turn that around quicker than the underlying problems take to fix. The side effect of this is that current player perception of CCP's lacklustre approach to new releases, (a good example being the vista bug that crashed the os of some client machines), will take even longer to change. CCP, you need to be very careful that your payerbase does not get fed up. No players = No cash. Directly we pay your wages in return for our own enjoyment. When playing eve becomes more frustrating due to lag, shoddy releases and badly supported functionality, then the amount of enjoyment attained playing then game, you've lost! Take a year out and fix what's there. Make eve work as planned and intended as opposed to how you rushed it out.
|
WubberDuck
Roving Guns Inc. RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 00:14:00 -
[1235]
100% agree
|
sw0358
Red Dwarf Mining Corporation space weaponry and trade
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 00:27:00 -
[1236]
100% Agreement, and signed ----------------------------------------------------
|
x Droth
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 00:29:00 -
[1237]
CCP, hire more people!
|
Marty269
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 00:45:00 -
[1238]
/Signed
|
Helig
Cyanide Midtown
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 00:56:00 -
[1239]
Supported
CCP does do a great job and I have a great amount of respect for the company and what they have accomplished, but I'm all for taking a look back to ensure content exceeds expectations.
|
Aia Jin
The Praxis Initiative Sodalitas XX
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 01:16:00 -
[1240]
Definitely support this proposal!
|
|
Vaporize
Mercurialis Inc. RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 01:30:00 -
[1241]
Edited by: Vaporize on 03/06/2010 01:34:09
I support the subject, agree with the points made in the OP, CCP can do better, and should be.
The CSM is a system to give hope to customers in that their voice might be heard and acted upon, but seriously does anyone really think that CCP has changed development priorities to address any idea, or subject? When I read that you have some hope that the CSM will change anything I feel bad as it will never happen unless it was something already planned to be done. I give CCP credit it's a good trick.
Look at this product from CCP's point of view, Eve as a test bed technology for the World of Darkness (WOD) product at this point, and has been for the past 3 years, they hit the revenue ceiling on Eve after the introduction of the GTC system, the box product did nothing at retail, and Steam also gave it a small rise, but it's a hardcore product for very hardcore people, and was designed that way to it's core. With the knowledge, and experience they have gained from running Eve if this is applied to WOD in design and the systems they might hit the goal of 120k people online on a single server, 2 mil subscriptions, Eve will never hit these numbers in any period of time that is relevant to them, so they have to hope to grow the company with new products.
Eve's core design prevent the changes to hit these numbers so we are relegated to either to having them change the core game-play which they will never do as the risk is too high, or improving what we have already and living with the limitations of the nature of this game.
All this being said, they can still improve Eve and should, the over promise and under deliver method has become their standard practice, this repetitive failure cycle will continue unless they get focused on Eve again, my fear or expectation is that they keep Eve on life support tossing us bones, using us as paying testers for technology dedicated for WOD, and then dump Eve once WOD ships.
|
Kenji Ryoku
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 01:51:00 -
[1242]
/signed
|
Xiong Yoshi
Roving Guns Inc. RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 01:53:00 -
[1243]
Quality > Quantity |
AngryAndy
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 01:57:00 -
[1244]
This should be a priority, It will extend the games life far more than new shiny things. +1
|
T'san Manaan
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 02:00:00 -
[1245]
want this to happen
|
Isabella Phoenix
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 02:06:00 -
[1246]
/signed
|
Sirius Bradford
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 02:23:00 -
[1247]
/me signs on the dotted line.
|
VB Sarge
Core Impulse
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 02:30:00 -
[1248]
I agree, while I don't think all things are as bad as some people do, there is a lot to be desired with improving some older systems that need looked at, and the newer stuff that has been coming out has definitely not been without issues. Granted, there will always be something wrong with a new development, but a lot of it does feel a bit like unpolished steel. sure in the sun it sparkles, but you look at it from any realistic angle and it's pretty not shiny.
|
Spillrag
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 03:03:00 -
[1249]
|
rantuket
SPORADIC MOVEMENT
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 03:44:00 -
[1250]
great stuff:
Quote: What we would like CCP to consider: * Continue developing features until they reach a predetermined 'excellence' level * Re-evaluate the amount of time allocated to fixing/developing old content and reduce the nonchalant attitude towards re-assigning teams to shiny new content. * Reconsider the total release schedule time: is it really sufficient to produce 'excellent' quality game design?
|
|
Ana Clavain
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 03:51:00 -
[1251]
signed would love to play this game as it should be
|
Morden Blackhawk
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 03:55:00 -
[1252]
Agreed
|
BlackChoc
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 04:00:00 -
[1253]
100% (it would be lovely if CCP finished things)
|
Qolde
Minmatar art of eve Gunmen of the Apocalypse
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 04:01:00 -
[1254]
/signed
Originally by: CCP Wrangler EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world.
|
JGR Guinevere
Caldari Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 04:03:00 -
[1255]
I can remember the joy I felt when the first rumblings of this game started to pop up on the Internet. It gave me the hope of finally being able to play an Elite style game as a MMO. To some extent, that has dream has been fulfilled (although, I am still waiting to be able to fly across the landscape of a plant). I have been attached to this game since beta and still love the concept of EVE. However, it seems to me that quality has fallen to the way side in favor of a fast development schedule over the last couple of years. Don't get me wrong. I like having significant updates every 6 months. However, I have to agree with the majority here--there must be some form of development in the direction of the older content. I just don't think that it will be possible without some increase in development personnel specifically allocated to this endeavor. Between the development of other projects and the upcoming Dust release there simply is not time for anything else. Their plate is full my friends.
What CCP must ask themselves is, "Do we love EVE?" If the answer is yes, then they need to gather up the team and really attempt to identify the most nagging issues with their beloved game. They should make a true effort to illicit the feedback of the community on those specific topics and then tackle the problems most important to them (as the loving creators) and us (the loving players) and call it a release. I don't know about anyone else. But I would be more than happy with a once a year major release followed a minor release that contains at least a few significant fixes to older content. I know that new releases drive new subscriptions and even sometimes pull old players back to the game. I know its a money thing. Everyone wants to make money. It's an acceptable endeavor. However, just as the original post suggests, is it worth being less than excellent? Is it worth being less than your potential? In the beginning, there was this small and obscure game developer named CCP. They were mavericks armed with the dream of creating something unique that broke the mold of what a MMO can be. I want to believe those mavericks still exist. I want to believe that dream is still alive. I want to believe that this little game, that was considered by many to be far to ambitious to succeed, is still loved by its creators.
We, the EVE community, LOVE this game. We, the eve community, prove our love everyday with our incessant whining. If we didn't care so much we would simply move on to another game. But we don't. We continue to come back, day after day, to experience something that can't be found anywhere else. We do so with the hope that this game, out of the many, will live up to its potential and that it will continue to be what other games strive to become.
|
Voddick
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 04:09:00 -
[1256]
Yes! |
lube nugget
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 04:09:00 -
[1257]
has any1 actually been bothered reading this far lol. Agreed
|
threeDspider
SPORADIC MOVEMENT Cult of War
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 04:13:00 -
[1258]
110% supported, fix lag issues before adding more features please!
|
Dave Hourai
Death of Virtue MeatSausage EXPRESS
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 04:50:00 -
[1259]
+1, Supported. If you're going to do it, do it right. No Beginning, No End |
Hailey Sunweaver
Ordnance. Epsilon Fleet
|
Posted - 2010.06.03 05:06:00 -
[1260]
Edited by: Hailey Sunweaver on 03/06/2010 05:05:59 I support this 100%
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 98 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |